Rick Archer did not do you any favor and possibly a great deal of harm by
encouraging your delusions.
What is grandiosity?
Grandiosity occurs when a person has an inflated self-esteem, believe they have
special powers, spiritual connections, or religious relationships.38
marekreavis:
I don't think that he was a pervert or
inordinately lecherous.
It's a very weak defense, Marek - apparently
I'm the only real defender of Maharishi
Mahesh Yogi on this entire list.
Go figure.
It has NOT been established that MMY had
sexual relations with anyone. You would
think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
chivukula.ravi@ wrote:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:38 PM, seventhray1 steve.sundur@...:
**
Here's what bugged me, and I am sorry to bring it
Ravi discusses his New Years Night at the Mist,
where he describes having a 19 year old girl hit him
up for drinks, and how the boner in his pants keeps
getting harder and harder. Let me say, nothing in
that story bothered me. I was rooting for the guy.
Ravi:
To date I have
Nice to see where you stand on this issue Richard. Can't say I am surprised.
Perhaps you feel a bit displaced as most trollish poster here.
These informants, such as Barry, Curtis, and Judith,
think they can just waltz into someone's bedroom, in the
middle of the night, and demand to be
Nice to see where you stand on this issue Richard.
Can't say I am surprised. Perhaps you feel a bit
displaced as most trollish poster here.
The forum has turned in to a 'fun zone', so I thought
I'd just make a joke out of it. Sorry, you don't have
a sense of humor today.
But, I've
Richard, it's not my contention that anything was proved in Judith's book,
only that her story, seemed plausible to me. There's not enough (if any)
evidence that we have to actually determine what, if anything, occurred between
Maharishi and Judith, or anyone else.
You may or may not be the
marekreavis:
...it's not my contention that anything was proved
in Judith's book, only that her story, seemed plausible
to me.
So, did you ever get a chance to cross examine MMY and
get his side of the story? Now that he's passed away he
can't defend his own good name. But, you'd think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@...
wrote:
Nice to see where you stand on this issue Richard. Can't say I am surprised.
Perhaps you feel a bit displaced as most trollish poster here.
These informants, such as Barry, Curtis, and Judith,
think
Oh my retarded TM TB, retarded psychologist shukra69. I'm not only
grandiose I'm a megalomaniac.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:11 AM, shukra69 shukr...@yahoo.ca wrote:
**
Rick Archer did not do you any favor and possibly a great deal of harm by
encouraging your delusions.
What is grandiosity?
marekreavis:
In a forum like FFL, however, where there are
so many posters and lurkers and where over a
hundred a messages a day are posted, it doesn't
make practical sense to apply the charge of
adoptive admission for anyone's failure to
respond to what someone else posts...
Where
Mr. Williams, I'm not sure if you expect a response, but if you're asking or
challenging me about my opinion of Judith's book, I'd reply that her narrative
seemed plausible to me and made me fonder of the human guy that Maharishi was.
I'm confident that he was a monkey just like the rest of
People could consider responding to what
other posters actually write...
Bhairitu:
I'm sure the judge would shut it down...
Well, if this was a court the judge would ask
for some evidence to be presented.
Some of the patients here probably need their
meds upped though. :-D
So,
Responses to two posts from Marek:
Sorry, Marek, but you've really fouled up the context here,
inadvertently or otherwise.
First, The charge of failing to condemn what other posters
have written has been a frequent one here applies almost
exclusively to Curtis's failure to reprove (not condemn)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
The real charge is that Curtis overlooks Barry's offensive
behavior because he wants to retain Barry's friendship. Curtis
himself has said as much. Curtis has also made it clear that he
feels no obligation to stand up for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
The real charge is that Curtis overlooks Barry's offensive
behavior because he wants to retain Barry's friendship. Curtis
himself has said as much.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
I do a whole lot of standing up for folks who have been
unfairly maligned, more than most here. I've done so for
you a number of times, remember?
Yes, you have. Thank you.
But I continue to not understand why you feel it is
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:38 PM, seventhray1 steve.sun...@sbcglobal.netwrote:
**
Here's what bugged me, and I am sorry to bring it up again. Ravi discusses
his New Years Night at the Mist, where he describes having a 19 year old
girl hit him up for drinks, and how the boner in his pants
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
chivukula.ravi@... wrote:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:38 PM, seventhray1 steve.sundur@...wrote:
**
Here's what bugged me, and I am sorry to bring it up again. Ravi
discusses
his New Years Night at the Mist, where he describes having
19 matches
Mail list logo
