Nice photos of Fair Field, Iowa
http://www.beingandseeing.com/ http://www.beingandseeing.com/
Fairfield
Come, humble sinner, in whose breast
A thousand thoughts revolve.
Come with your guilt and fear oppressed,
And make this last resolve.
I'll go to the Domes , though my sin
Hath
Thanks, Buck, these are wonderful too. I didn't realize how many good
photographers we have in FF. I've always thought the midwest has its own kind
of beauty. Sure, the coasts have beautiful sunrises on the ocean and the west
has the snow clad Rockies. But all that land stretching out in all
I'm nobody! Who are you? I'm nobody! Who are you?
Are you nobody, too?
Then there's a pair of us -- don't tell!
They'd banish -- you know!
How dreary to be somebody!
How public like a frog
To tell one's name the livelong day
To an admiring bog!
Emily Dickinson
Wolf Baiter sez:
Perhaps Richard cares. But then you might be right. What are we? Suppose that
in reality we are all NOBODY inside, that our personal life is but the stuff
dreams are made of, a fiction created by mistaking our idea of ourselves for
something that is real?
Great synopsis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill wrote:
Wolf Baiter sez:
Perhaps Richard cares. But then you might be right. What are we?
Suppose that in reality we are all NOBODY inside, that our personal life
is but the stuff dreams are made of, a fiction created by mistaking our
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote:
Wolf Baiter sez:
Perhaps Richard cares. But then you might be right. What are we? Suppose that
in reality we are all NOBODY inside, that our personal life is but the stuff
dreams are made of, a fiction created by mistaking our
Ann---
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares that
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill wrote:
Wolf Baiter sez:
Perhaps Richard cares. But then you might be right. What are we? Suppose
that in reality we are all NOBODY inside, that our personal life is but
Well, it sure looks like you're posting as the author's friend, but
it's hard to tell by the way you spelled your it, authfriend. The
problem isn't so much what the respondents here think about your handle
and your email address - it's what your clients think about it when they
find out you're
You're sounding JELLOS, but I am retired now, so I do have lot's of time
on my hands. I can always depend on your to respond, but are you retired
too?
On 12/9/2013 8:30 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is a man who has far too much free time on his hands.
Barry always describes negative situations, with which he is intimately
evolved, and often a causal partner, as if he is observing them from a
distance.
I think its called hypocrisy.:-) :-) :-)
But wait a minute, Richard! Way over on that other thread Time Doesn't
Exist..., they concluded that time is an illusion! Signed, the other retired
non self on FFL (-:
Well Ann, I didn't make up the rules around here and I didn't start this
thread either. But, I did post this from my home office and I used my
real name, so it looks like I'm guilty on all charges. The only
difference is, I don't charge anything for offering my opinions like a
professional
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares if you care what Share cares about. NOBODY.
On 12/9/2013 8:44 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if you're
posting
Richard, Ann was talking about Sweet Share (-:
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 9:57 AM, Richard J. Williams
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares if you care what Share cares about. NOBODY.
On 12/9/2013 8:44 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares if you care what Share cares about. NOBODY.
I just thought it was funny, that's all. The crazy old coot does this
all the time -- claim that she *could* document something to prove how
RIGHT
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares if you care what Share cares about. NOBODY.
I just thought it was funny, that's all. The crazy old coot does this all the
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Richard trolled:
Well, it sure looks like you're posting as the author's friend, but it's
hard to tell by the way you spelled your it,
Interesting, but not at all unexpected. After I'd refuted Richard's accusation
that I had fibbed, with documentation, I asked explicitly if anyone could
still detect any fibs.
Barry couldn't, of course, because there weren't any (duh).
I had done exactly what I had promised to do. So
Ann, I have a hunch that by Wolf Baiter, empty isn't referring to you but to
Xeno, who baited you. I.e., you da wolf, Xeno da baiter.
empty wrote:
Wolf Baiter sez:
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Richard trolled:
Well Ann, I didn't make up the rules around here and I didn't start this
thread either. But, I did post this from my
Dear Sharry:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbOqu079hyg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbOqu079hyg
Maybe I missed the documentation of how Judy created a macro in Neo, but
it's not important - what is interesting is Judy's statement below,
which contradicts her previous statement, that the TM mantras are not
the names of the personal gods. If Judy refuted her own statement, can
someone
It sure looks like you're posting as authfriend and it looks like your
email address is authfriend. But I could be mistaken. Are you still The
Author's Friend or not? Seriously - it's not a trick question!
On 12/10/2013 10:45 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*This is all trolling, stuff
Now this is funny - somebody that posts as empty, is nobody, and gets
a reply from nobody, and an authfriend, who is a professional editor,
replies to nobody. Go figure.
n 12/10/2013 10:55 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ann, I have a hunch that by Wolf Baiter, empty isn't referring to
you
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
P.S.: Anyone with two synapses to rub together should be able to figure out
Richard's fib here, even if they didn't read my refutation.
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Richard trolled:
It sure looks like you're posting as authfriend and it looks like your email
address is authfriend. But I could be
It's true - I've been picked on by Judy for about ten years. I'm not
making this up. Nobody would dispute this except Judy. It used to kind
of hurt my feelings because I've posted thousands of on-topic message on
the internet mostly about spiritual paths since 1999. But, I don't take
it
It really doesn't matter what your handle is or what your email address
is, because you posted a fib, and it's not very difficult to tell when
you're trying to weasel out of it. You either posted the message below
or you did not. If you did, it contradicts what you previously posted
about the
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Richard trolled:
It really doesn't matter what your handle is or what your email address is,
because you posted a fib, and it's not
So, I guess it's settled now - Judy posted a fib and now everyone knows
it. Serves her right for trying to be so high and mighty and attempting
to teach us all about TM and what MMY meant about the names of the
personal gods, which fetch to us all the grace. Judy thinks she knows
more about TM
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
Ann, I have a hunch that by Wolf Baiter, empty isn't referring to you but to
Xeno, who baited you. I.e., you da wolf, Xeno da baiter.
He always calls me that so I am not so sure he meant it the way you describe
here, but your
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Richard trolled:
So, I guess it's settled now - Judy posted a fib and now everyone knows it.
Serves her right for trying to be so high
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
Judy, sound like a constipated Inquisition judge all you want...
Or at the very least, throw in a dance number from time to time to
lighten things up...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbcyiFt5VEs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
Judy, sound like a constipated Inquisition judge all you want...
Or at the very least, throw in a dance number from time to time to
lighten things up...
Nice altered hymn Buck, but you are turning people away from Jesus,
as the original, with words by Edmund Jones, intended. Of course these
days, most people do not get what Jesus was about.
Here is an interesting article on the M effect and science,
and it gives a very different spin on this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Let's make this real simple so everyone understands:
NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if you're
posting here in between working for clients and NOBODY cares if you
have
any clients and NOBODY cares
Me too, turq. Except I probably wouldn't take Judy's detailed refutation
seriously enough for her!
On Monday, December 9, 2013 1:23 PM, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Let's make this real simple so everyone
I don't believe for a second, Barry, that you take Richard seriously. Rather,
you take me VERY seriously, and you're continuing to stalk me. So I really
shouldn't accede to your request. But it's so laughably simple, I will.
(Oh, by the way, you failed Emily's test miserably. You were unable
You didn't think your opinion carried any weight one way or the other, did you,
Share?
Share inspidated:
Me too, turq. Except I probably wouldn't take Judy's detailed refutation
seriously enough for her!
On Monday, December 9, 2013 1:23 PM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
And BTW, you didn't answer my questions. Here, I'll repeat them for your
convenience:
If you are now, finally, willing to admit that I did qualify the statements in
that post, why did you whine to Barry that I had not done so? Even right down
to denying I'd said the very words I did, in
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if you're
posting
here in between working for clients and NOBODY cares if you have any
clients
and almost NOBODY cares if you post anything or not. Almost NOBODY.
On 12/9/2013 1:23 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
---
Let's get serious.
So, why would anybody care if anyone else is posting from home; or from
their living room; or from their kitchen; or from a cafe in Paris, FR;
or from a Dairy Queen in Paris, TX; or even posting from a parking lot
on a cell phone Walmart in Deadwood, SD?
Now, I can
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Richard wrote:
The problem is posting to a chat room using your professional name as a
handle and including your business email address in
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno)
takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Poor Richard. One minute he's expounding on the quinoa salad, the next he is
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Let's get serious.
So, why would anybody care if anyone else is posting from home; or from their
living room; or from their kitchen; or from a cafe in Paris, FR; or from a
Dairy Queen in Paris, TX; or even posting from a
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if you're posting
here in between working for clients and NOBODY cares if you have any clients
and almost NOBODY cares if you post anything or
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if you're posting
here in between working for clients and NOBODY cares if you have any
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if you're posting
49 matches
Mail list logo
