[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-13 Thread authfriend
] On Behalf Of Bhairitu Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 2:06 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record All this talk is silly. Either keep the 50 post limit or no limits. And how do we know that Judy wasn't planning a vaca

[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote: snip And how do we know that Judy wasn't planning a vaca and won't be back for a week anyway so didn't care. I believe she did that before. Let me get this straight. Are you really suggesting that I deliberately overposted

[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-12 Thread emptybill
Turq I'm not opposed to posting limits since they have curbed the over-posters on FFL. However, having a bank of 10 unused posts would solve the problem of going over the limit from inadvertence. I don't have a dog in the fight on most of these contentions between people. I also don't

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-12 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of emptybill Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 1:33 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record Turq I'm not opposed to posting limits since they have curbed

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-12 Thread Bhairitu
Rick Archer wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of emptybill Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 1:33 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record Turq I'm not opposed to posting

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-12 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bhairitu Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 2:06 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record All this talk is silly. Either keep the 50 post limit

[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-12 Thread emptybill
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bhairitu Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 2:06 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count

[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-12 Thread emptybill
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 2:06 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record All this talk is silly. Either keep the 50 post limit or no limits. And how do we know that Judy wasn't planning a vaca and won't be back for a week anyway

[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-12 Thread Alex Stanley
rick@ wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bhairitu Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 2:06 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record All this talk is silly. Either