I just helped circulate that in another post.
It is ambiguous, but I am not sure which slant was meant. The by
definition proof isn't definative IMO. It needs clarification by
Wilson -- which I assume he will provide today.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just helped circulate that in another post.
It is ambiguous, but I am not sure which slant was meant.
I just *told* you which slant was meant.
Don't let your mind be so open your brains
fall out. You've been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just helped circulate that in another post.
It is ambiguous, but I am not sure which slant was meant.
I just *told* you which slant
Its occurred to me Judy that you have perhaps some parallel traits of
the great Holly Hunter character in Broadcast News -- a film I like a
lot. One of the upper network execs says to her, in exasperation and
sarchasm, It must be wonderful to know that you are always right.
And she looks point
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just helped circulate that in another post.
It is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Its occurred to me Judy that you have perhaps some parallel traits
of
the great Holly Hunter character in Broadcast News -- a film I like
a
lot. One of the upper network execs says to her, in exasperation and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Your problem is, you're not making a distinction
between what is *self-evidently* true and what is
*probably* true. Your caveat is fine when
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Your problem is, you're not making a distinction
between what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just helped circulate that in another post.
It is ambiguous, but I am not sure which slant was meant. The by
definition proof isn't definative IMO. It needs clarification by
Wilson -- which I assume he will
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just helped circulate that in another post.
It is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One sentence, out of context, and you're both arguing about who is
smarter.
I'm telling ya, Vaj was onto something with the
Ashkenazi overclocker thing.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One sentence, out of context, and you're both arguing about who is
smarter.
Well I can say with 100% certainty that I am not arguing about who is
smarter. Indeed it in recognition of my limits, that I suggest it is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[...]
I'd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One sentence, out of context, and you're both arguing about who is
smarter.
Well I can say with 100% certainty that I am not arguing
Just to correct your misstatement:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I'd just suggest that
you READ THE STATEMENT IN CONTEXT, as I did.
I did do that, you already
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One sentence, out of context, and you're both arguing about who is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just helped circulate that in another post.
It is ambiguous, but I am not sure which slant was meant. The by
definition proof isn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to correct your misstatement:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I'd just suggest that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One sentence, out of context, and you're both arguing about who is
smarter.
I'm telling ya, Vaj was onto something with the
Ashkenazi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just to correct your misstatement:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In
authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok Judy, but by doing so, I have to sadly put another huge dent in
your facade of infallibility. Which puts doubts in your
self-proclaimed ability to interpret what others write with 100%
certainty. Its a sad day for indoctrination and fanaticism.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm not sure whether you're trying to pull
a fast one, or are just DEEPLY confused. I
strongly suspect the former.
Gee, no other options?
None that I can think of, no.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm not sure whether you're trying to pull
a fast one, or are just DEEPLY confused. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm not sure
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just helped circulate that in another post.
It is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One sentence, out of context, and you're both arguing about who
is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Al Gore said: I took the initiative in creating the Internet.
Just for the record, the way it was reported
in much of the press--and still is, to this day
--was that he said he had invented the Internet,
which is even
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Al Gore said: I took the initiative in creating the Internet.
Just for the record, the way it was reported
in much of the press--and still
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Al Gore said: I took the initiative in creating the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
And that was only *one* of the many statements
from Gore that the so-called liberal media
misquoted or seriously misconstrued.
Its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Perhaps one of these others is the correct one, but since you ALSO
thought that this was what he meant, why did you quote an article
that argued the alternate point-of-view as though it was more valid
than what you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they'd just do their damned *job*, things
wouldn't be quite so bleak right now.
It would appear that many now see their *job* as sucking up to their
corporate bosses and the WH in order to keep their jobs and
If you run your offline relationships like you do your
online ones, I feel sorry for your friends...
I imagine they feel either totally intimidated or
under siege most of the time.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If they'd just do their damned *job*, things
wouldn't be quite so bleak right now.
It would appear that many now see their *job* as sucking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you run your offline relationships like you do your
online ones, I feel sorry for your friends...
I imagine they feel either totally intimidated or
under siege most of the time.
Imagining things is fun.
To
Jesus H. Christ! Do these guys ever give it a rest.
Why don't you side mail each other. Flaming exchanges
that last three or four posts are one thing, but these
endless postings are insane.
--- Cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you run your offline relationships like you do
your
online
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesus H. Christ! snip
What does the H stand for, again? Harvey? Maybe Jesus reincarnated
as a Pooka? :-)
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesus H. Christ! Do these guys ever give it a rest.
Why don't you side mail each other. Flaming exchanges
that last three or four posts are one thing, but these
endless postings are insane.
Yes, I second that.
42 matches
Mail list logo