agreed-- as has been said, there is no such thing as bad publicity. and that
goes for the TM and MMY bashers here too- just by criticizing and bashing TM
they continue to keep it alive in the minds of those who read these posts.
after some time all people remember was a discussion on TM, not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@... wrote:
agreed-- as has been said, there is no such thing as
bad publicity. and that goes for the TM and MMY bashers
here too- just by criticizing and bashing TM they continue
to keep it alive in the minds of those who
On Apr 10, 2009, at 6:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Judy and Raunchydog have stated that they
feel that revealing information about the
puja and the nature of the mantras, etc.
could be confusing to new meditators and
spoil the innocence of their experience
of TM. They have put themselves on the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Apr 10, 2009, at 6:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Judy and Raunchydog have stated that they
feel that revealing information about the
puja and the nature of the mantras, etc.
could be confusing to new meditators and
spoil
On Apr 10, 2009, at 8:26 AM, raunchydog wrote:
Project JADED INNOCENCE:
What would be nice would be to put up a video of the puja on YouTube,
and simply label it as what it is and what it is used for. The person
performing the puja could wear a mask to conceal identity. Then the
video could
What you put your attention on grows.
Is it just me, or does ED make some sense below?
To me, if the world had ignored Ann Coulter, instead of paying attention to her
dysfunctions, we'd not have the likes of Rep. Michele Bachmann. I mean, how
many more pretty women are going to say to
thanks for your post! please keep the controversy going!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_reply@ wrote:
agreed-- as has been said, there is no such thing as
bad publicity. and that goes for
yep- the way i look at it is not whether TM is a panacea for all (it does work
spectacularly well for me, and a lot of others though...), but to just keep
getting the name out there legitimizes it in the [spiritual] marketplace.
for example with cars, i've never much cared for Chryslers- never
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked Howard Stern's schtick, and I don't like O'Reilly's schtick,
but so what? They
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@... wrote:
agreed-- as has been said, there is no such thing as bad publicity. and that
goes for the TM and MMY bashers here too- just by criticizing and bashing TM
they continue to keep it alive in the minds of those who read
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
What you put your attention on grows.
Is it just me, or does ED make some sense below?
To me, if the world had ignored Ann Coulter, instead of paying attention to
her dysfunctions, we'd not have the likes of Rep. Michele
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_re...@... wrote:
ing.
The point about the health food store is that Stern is qualified to say TM is
a good thing, even if he's not too sattvic a guy -- even as anybody even in
the worst health can sell stuff at a health food store.
But
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
ing.
The point about the health food store is that Stern is qualified to say TM
is a good thing, even if he's not too sattvic a guy -- even as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
One of the things I've found most fascinating in
all of this post-concert I'm important because
something I was once associated with is in the
news idiocy is the continuing tendency on the
part of the TMO and TMers to not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_reply@ wrote:
agreed-- as has been said, there is no such
thing as bad publicity. and that goes for the
TM and MMY bashers here too- just by
criticizing and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
ing.
The point about the health food store is that Stern is qualified to say TM
is a good thing, even if he's not too sattvic a guy -- even as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
ing.
The point about the health food store is that Stern is qualified to say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But
This analogy beaks down quite quickly when one considers that many plants
thrive best when stressed while others who have ideal conditions compete
with other plants eventually for growing space. The master gardener knows
what plants to plant where and how to grow them. They do not just throw
Lately, due to Facebook, I finally met up with old MIU buddies, and I was
surprised to find that many if not most all of my friends are now in some
humanitarian line of work. Even some people who seemed never to be that
humanistic. So TM may be part of the growth of their compassion. One thing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
One of the things I've found most fascinating in
all of this post-concert I'm important because
something I was once associated with is in the
news idiocy is the continuing tendency on the
part of the TMO and TMers to not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
One of the things I've found most fascinating in
all of this post-concert I'm important because
something I was once associated with is in the
news idiocy is the continuing tendency on the
part of the TMO and TMers to not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
One of the things I've found most fascinating in
all of this post-concert I'm important because
something I was once associated with is in the
news idiocy is the continuing tendency on the
part of the TMO and TMers to not
O'Reilly frequently sets politics aside for a worthy cause.. unlike many
others. The fact that this event is charitable for at risk youth and not a
demand for tax payers to foot the bill is why O'Reilly commended those that
involved themselves.
--- On Thu, 4/9/09, sparaig lengli...@cox.net
So silly that I won't even bother to offer evidence to contradict it.
Well you should have bothered because you would have found out that he was
right. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_Act on the Neutrality Acts
of the '30s pushed by the Repubs and opposed by Roosevelt.
The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked Howard Stern's schtick, and I don't like O'Reilly's schtick,
but so what? They both are displaying an enthusiasm for TM, and I like that.
Like MMY always
On Apr 9, 2009, at 5:21 PM, bob_brigante wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked Howard Stern's schtick, and I don't like O'Reilly's
schtick, but so what? They both are displaying an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Apr 9, 2009, at 5:21 PM, bob_brigante wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
But BILL O'REILLY? That's going too far.
***
I've never liked Howard Stern's schtick, and I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, guyfawkes91 guyfawke...@... wrote:
So silly that I won't even bother to offer evidence to contradict it.
Well you should have bothered because you would have found out that he was
right. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_Act on the
33 matches
Mail list logo
