--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
One of the things I find myself noticing in Curtis' descriptions
of David Eagleman's findings and opinions is that Eagleman seems
to
* * Great interchange, you guys. I am with Barry on this one -- the tools we
choose determine the reality we perceive: if we use the dualist intellect we
gain dualistic, intellect-tinted results; if we use the nondualist Self we gain
Selfish, nondualist-tinted results.
--- In
turquoiseb:
...as a scientist (not having read this book),
Reality might be defined as that which can be
observed repeatedly by objective viewers
In reality, we only know anything based on the
three valid means of knowledge: the senses,
inference, and verbal testimony.
Most of what we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
One of the things I find myself noticing in Curtis' descriptions of
David Eagleman's findings and opinions is that Eagleman seems to make
the same assumption that religious people make. That is, that there is
something
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
One of the things I find myself noticing in Curtis'
descriptions of David Eagleman's findings and opinions
is that Eagleman seems to make
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
One of the things I find myself noticing in Curtis'
descriptions
