on 6/19/05 6:13 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ammachi, Shree Maa, Karunamayi, Mirabai, Mother Meera, etc. etc.
I will presume that none of these ladies are recluses since you are
mentioning Ammachi first, and she is clearly not a recluse. Anyway,
what happens today in India
on 6/19/05 6:37 PM, Peter Sutphen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I should point out is that this is NOT an
absolute in the
TMO. Those of us who received the full A of E
technique also received
the mantras of the 7 dimensions and they ALL begin
with AUM...
There was no AUM in my
Right like bhu bhuvaha maha janaha tapaha swaha
satyam?
- Original Message -
From: Vaj
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
Well there are--but there are four "above" it.On Jun
on 6/19/05 7:00 PM, akasha_108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 19, 2005, at 7:37 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
There was no AUM in my A of E technique.
The full technique has the mantras of the 7 lokas, each beginning with
on 6/19/05 7:41 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 10:56 AM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't do know of any other tradition which believes this Om thing
outside of TM. Do you?
No. And
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 6:37 PM, Peter Sutphen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I should point out is that this is NOT an
absolute in the
TMO. Those of us who received the full A of E
technique also received
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 6:13 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ammachi, Shree Maa, Karunamayi, Mirabai, Mother Meera, etc. etc.
I will presume that none of these ladies are recluses since you
are
mentioning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 7:41 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 10:56 AM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't do know of any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 6:13 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ammachi, Shree Maa, Karunamayi, Mirabai, Mother Meera, etc. etc.
I will presume that none of these ladies are recluses since you
are
mentioning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 7:00 PM, akasha_108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 19, 2005, at 7:37 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
There was no AUM in my A of E
bbrigante wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 6:13 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ammachi, Shree Maa, Karunamayi, Mirabai, Mother Meera, etc. etc.
I will presume that none of these ladies are recluses since
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I think they mean to say renunciate not recluse. I once got
corrected when I applied the term.
From what I recall, MMY made the distinction in terms of social
behavior more than anything else. Recluses don't deal
you got the Mantras from Michel Angot? here is the page from Paul
Mason website quoteing Guru Dev as saying women should replace OM in
such mantras with Shree
http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/gurudev.htm#lifestory
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a
on 6/19/05 8:12 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MMY once referred to himself as a householder when asked. It was on
one of the more common tapes. Interestingly enough most people don't
remember this. He had the most peculiar look on his face when he
answered, as though he had never
on 6/19/05 8:53 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Courcheval, Summer of '75.
Possibly the thinking was that Purusha, or precursors of these recluse
groups, were OK for using OM mantras?
Maybe. That wasn't explained to us. It was a pre-Purusha group. Mostly
former 108's,
on 6/19/05 9:06 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I emailed my friend who's sending me these daily OM mantras:
Some people on FFL are wondering about the OM issue (supposedly makes you a
recluse). Apparently you no longer buy that, or you wouldnt be sending
these out. My mantra (from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, no.
No it isn't an assumption it is just a lie as any honest reading of
the quote of Guru Dev makes clear that you couldn't possibly honestly
mistake it as applying to one woman only:
aum-kara ka japa
Repetition of the aum
on 6/19/05 10:18 PM, shukra69 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what exactly is aumkara ka japa?
--
Rick Archer
SearchSummit
1108 South B Street
Fairfield, IA 52556
Phone: 641-472-9336
Fax: 815-572-5842
http://searchsummit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 8:53 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Courcheval, Summer of '75.
Possibly the thinking was that Purusha, or precursors of these
recluse
groups, were OK for using OM mantras?
Maybe.
on 6/19/05 11:06 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether these OM mantras in the Age of Enlightenment techniques were
given only to Purusha wannabes or precursors, they stopped giving them
out fairly quickly, right? And women never got the OM mantra A of E
techniques, right?
I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 11:06 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether these OM mantras in the Age of Enlightenment techniques were
given only to Purusha wannabes or precursors, they stopped giving
them
out fairly
Japa on Om.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Archer
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
on 6/19/05 10:18 PM, shukra69 at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:So what exactly is aumkara ka japa?--Rick
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 10:18 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote:
Well, no. No it isn't an assumption it is just a lie as any honest reading
ofthe quote of Guru Dev makes clear
on 6/19/05 11:24 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you have at least partially spilled the beans on the A of E
techniques, would you be interested in saying if they were substituted
for the twenty minutes of TM, as if they were advanced techniques? Or
practiced for a couple
Bob, nothing you say about mantra is right because
you're a pundit and have no understanding of even the nyasa of one finger joint.
- Original Message -
From: bbrigante
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 11:06 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 8:12 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MMY once referred to himself as a householder when asked. It was on
one of the more common tapes. Interestingly enough most people don't
remember this. He
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
on 6/19/05 11:58 PM, Llundrub at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is all Vedic caste based shit, and is not the Dharma of Liberation which is free from such meager and worldly fears.
Amma said something like this too. That this OM prohibition
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shukra69 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TM mantras are mostly Shakti mantras and Siddha Yoga uses Shiva
mantras. Hence why TM'ers live in the heads.
Really? I
cardemaister wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shukra69 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TM mantras are mostly Shakti mantras and Siddha Yoga uses Shiva
mantras. Hence
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TM mantras are mostly Shakti mantras and Siddha Yoga uses Shiva
mantras. Hence why TM'ers live in the heads. Plus advanced
technique
users
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
shukra69 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TM mantras are mostly Shakti mantras and
Plus advanced
Sorry, I'm probably confusing some here. In general,
mantra shastra divides mantras between shakti and shiva mantras.
Shakti mantras are considered more intense than shiva mantras and therefore
usually not given to the general public. This is held in a lot of
traditions.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Plus advanced
Sorry, I'm probably confusing some here. In general, mantra
shastra
divides mantras between shakti and shiva mantras. Shakti mantras
are
considered more intense than shiva mantras and
I'm not sure what Maharishi has said about the AUM sound;
My understanding is it is associated with the Goddess Kali.
I can see why, Maharishi would say that married women,
should not relate toclosely: to the insatiable Kali.
And the sound of Aum,
Is thatUniversal sound or vibration
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm not sure what Maharishi has said about the AUM sound;
My understanding is it is associated with the Goddess Kali.
I can see why, Maharishi would say that married women,
should not relate to closely: to
101 - 135 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
