uns_tressor wrote:
**
I had forgotten how much I dislike HTML in
message boards. Well worth banning.
Uns.
**
How about thread hijacking? Look how deep the threads get here when
there are actually several
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
uns_tressor wrote:
**
I had forgotten how much I dislike HTML in
message boards. Well worth banning.
Uns.
**
How about thread
Many thanks for your reply, Vaj. Yes, this all sounds pretty familiar,
except for your phrase such a high level -- here is certainly not
high; I feel exactly the same as before I ever started on any path. I
mean *complete* ordinariness; ignorance even -- the only real
difference being a simple
uns_tressor wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
uns_tressor wrote:
**
I had forgotten how much I dislike HTML in
message boards. Well worth banning.
Uns.
**
On Jun 26, 2005, at 6:42 PM, anonymousff wrote:
For perspective, is full Buddhahood, beyond the cloud of dharma,
realized by many in these traditions? The Dalai Lama ? Various
Rinpoches? At what level is the attainment of the Rainbow Body?
Yes, certainly it is realized.
The rainbow body as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 26, 2005, at 9:59 AM, authfriend wrote:
Wow, I never heard that the absence of thoughts
in TM indicates an absence of progress. Is
that something MMY says that I've somehow managed
to miss?
Yeah, whatever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] opined a tad uncharitably:
How about thread hijacking? Look how deep the threads get here
when there are actually several subthreads
...YahooGroups is not that sophisticated. Its threading
software is crap. If you
This is sound advice, but
for my part, I would sooner die than follow it."
HariOm,
Would Premanand Paul and Bob Brigantte give their opinion on this
please.??
With, Jai Guru Dev,
Jason
---Why, who cares what they think? I can tell you that
my having 37 jobs proves
Interesting. I am curious though why Jason want the two
opions of Paul and Bob, and not others? Are they especially suited to the quote
somehow. I'm sorry Guys that I belittled your output. But uns_tressors urls seem
to refer more to the Moron Movement mentality, that Bob espouses, and I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip As for getting a straigh answer to something Ii don't recall
Bob ever giving one that didn't merely come rebounding off one of his
inner mental rubberbands. If you were tryin to get his to step outside
of his mental
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
ok, my question to Vaj had more to do with questioning the
practical
benefit of sitting as you say in samadhi for however long. I
understand
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
It is far more attractive to me to cultivate a state of steady
prajna or a permanent state of non-anger, etc, than some abstraction
called enlightenment.
You guys who have had some success in life don't know the simple
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 26, 2005, at 12:41 AM, sparaig wrote:
Did you get to see the EEG of Ken Wilber I posted a while back?
Yes I did. Do you want me to ask EEG experts to comment on what it
shows?
Already shared it with one,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 26, 2005, at 9:59 AM, authfriend wrote:
Wow, I never heard that the absence of thoughts
in TM indicates an absence of progress. Is
that something MMY says that I've somehow managed
to miss?
Yeah, whatever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is sound advice, but for my part,
I would sooner die than follow it.
Hari Om,
Would Premanand Paul and Bob Brigantte
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 26, 2005, at 9:59 AM, authfriend wrote:
Wow, I never heard that the absence of
Anyone care to join in a discussion with some Buddhists, pseudo-
Bhuddists, and agnostics?
The agnostics/atheists are the only rude ones. The Buddhists are nice.
I think I bit off more than I could chew though :-)
C'mon Bob, Dr. Pete, Akasha and you other guys, help me out here.
Naysayers and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 26, 2005, at 9:59 AM, authfriend wrote:
Wow, I never heard that the absence of thoughts
Having practiced both styles of meditation, I can
attest to the fact that using certain styles of focused
or concentrative meditation, one can pretty much enter
samadhi at will and have it last for twenty minutes,
an hour, or several hours, with no thoughts present.
For the dyed-in-the-wool TMer,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what IS the choice though?
Acquiesce to either
1)idiocy,
2)failure, or
3)slavery?
Why not play the game fully? Stay intact, true to oneself, and
express it in such a way that those in power side with us.
uns_tressor wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] opined a tad uncharitably:
How about thread hijacking? Look how deep the threads get here
when there are actually several subthreads
...YahooGroups is not that sophisticated. Its
Jeff:
Nor do I think one guy can handle this planet alone. It takes
a group. And ultimately we all make it together or not at all.
A philosophy that tends to be espoused by groups.
Unc
True. But disorganized groups have been run over by organized
groups of dubious notoriety:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 26, 2005, at 9:59 AM, authfriend wrote:
Wow, I never heard that the absence of
Hey, all
According to Mantreshwar, an ancient jyotish author, my birth chart
has a yoga for being a sanyasi, practicing a form of Buddhism. As a
practicing TM meditator, I was at first puzzled by this observation.
However, after pondering the description of this yoga, I became
appreciative
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 26,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having practiced both styles of meditation, I can
attest to the fact that using certain styles of focused
or concentrative meditation, one can pretty much enter
samadhi at will and have it last for twenty minutes,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
yeah but I never said what he is alluding to, that an absence of
thoughts is indicative of a lack of progress during TM. I'm not
sure where he got the idea, but it wasn't from me.
In my reply above I was just
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
