Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Hey! I've got an idea! Why don't we infiltrate the Church in Rome with our own 
people and change it from within, to be what *we* want it to be. If Christians 
want to influence our government, shouldn't the government be able to influence 
the church? Those fucking Catholics, how backwards can you get.
 

 Well, I think you can get more "backwards". Take Trump for example. He appears 
to be living in some Stone Age.
 

 Anybody been reading E-mails?
 

 Nope, I can hardly keep up with my own.
 


 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 9:05 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :

 Hey Mike!  Didn't I say a while back that if Hillary was the nominee the 
campaign would be about character and not issues?  If Bernie got the nomination 
it would be about issues?  Look at the degeneration of the American 
consciousness.  Some states (including California) you can write in a choice.  
There is a move in those states to write in Bernie as a protest vote.
 
 Of course we have our resident "shamer" troll who tries shame anyone who has a 
liberal view if they quote a "right wing source" even if that source is 
correct.  Shame on that troll!
 

 "shame" is such an old-fashioned concept. Are you Catholic?
 
 On 10/15/2016 04:51 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   If Trump fondled my balls, I wouldn't have gone public but I would have 
immediately reported it to police and asked for an investigation and police 
report verifying that I did report it.
 
 You are, apparently, unable to grasp what it takes to stand up to such 
intimidation and wealth as Trump can wield even though, in reality, he is a 
pitiable loser.
 Now you know how the Clinton sexual victims feel! What kind of power does a 
woman have against the Attorney General/ Governor of a state or a President 
have, especially when his wife sends out Lawyers from the Rose Law Firm to 
threaten and silence the victims.

 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
mailto:awoelflebater@...[FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are 
busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder. 
The problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost 
immediately. Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent 
till now. Trump has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and 
never accused publicly of these things and never called a racist until he ran 
against a Democrat. This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he 
supposedly did these things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a 
*patriarchal society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when 
Bill Clinton perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"
 Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of  
these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and 
compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough.
 
 
 I dare you t! o say that if Trump had fondled your balls that you would have 
gone public or legal on him. I don't believe you have the money or the chutzpah 
to have taken him on in the face of such an affront given his power and wealth. 
There is safety in numbers and it seems that at some point enough is enough for 
these women. You obviously have no idea of the kind of legal and financial sway 
he has over people. He is as eager to sic his lawyers on those who confront him 
as you are to vilify Hillary. 
 
 
 

 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question

 
   So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or 
better or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 
 
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 




 
 












 
 







 



 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Hey! I've got an idea! Why don't we infiltrate the Church in Rome with our own 
people and change it from within, to be what *we* want it to be. If Christians 
want to influence our government, shouldn't the government be able to influence 
the church? Those fucking Catholics, how backwards can you get.
Anybody been reading E-mails?

  From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 9:05 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :

Hey Mike!  Didn't I say a while backthat if Hillary was the nominee the 
campaign would be aboutcharacter and not issues?  If Bernie got the nomination 
it wouldbe about issues?  Look at the degeneration of the 
Americanconsciousness.  Some states (including California) you can writein a 
choice.  There is a move in those states to write in Bernieas a protest vote.

Of course we have our resident "shamer" troll who tries shameanyone who has a 
liberal view if they quote a "right wing source"even if that source is correct. 
 Shame on that troll!
"shame" is such an old-fashioned concept. Are you Catholic?

On 10/15/2016 04:51 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@...[FairfieldLife] wrote:


  If Trump fondled my balls, Iwouldn't have gone public but I would have 
immediatelyreported it to police and asked for an investigation andpolice 
report verifying that I did report it.
You are,apparently, unable to grasp what it takes to stand upto such 
intimidation and wealth as Trump can wieldeven though, in reality, he is a 
pitiable loser.
Now you know how the Clinton sexual victims feel! Whatkind of power does a 
woman have against the AttorneyGeneral/ Governor of a state or a President 
have,especially when his wife sends out Lawyers from the RoseLaw Firm to 
threaten and silence the victims.
  From:"awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]"<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent:Friday, October 14, 2016 11:16 PM
Subject:Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,<mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

That'sthe whole point. It's the classicSaul Alinsky tactic. If you arebusted 
for something, deny it andaccuse your accuser of the same,but louder. The 
problem here isthat Bill Clinton's accusers,accused him almost 
immediately.Trump's accusers, accused as muchas thirty years later. Silent 
tillnow. Trump has been a publicfigure for some thirty years orlonger and never 
accused publiclyof these things and never called aracist until he ran against 
aDemocrat. This is their *playbook*. BTW, he was a Democrat whenhe supposedly 
did these things,thus it wasn't his fault, he was avictim of a 
*patriarchalsociety*up bringing. Yeah, yeah,that's the ticket! Remember 
whenBill Clinton perjured himself andall we heard was, "it's just aboutsex"
Also,there are wholes big enough todrive an 18 wheeler through insome of  these 
stories. Thefact that Wikileaks isexposing the medias bias andcompliance and 
coordinationwith the Hillary campaign saysenough.
Idare you t! o say that ifTrump had fondled your ballsthat you would have 
gonepublic or legal on him. Idon't believe you have themoney or the chutzpah to 
havetaken him on in the face ofsuch an affront given hispower and wealth. There 
issafety in numbers and it seemsthat at some point enough isenough for these 
women. Youobviously have no idea of thekind of legal and financialsway he has 
over people. He isas eager to sic his lawyers onthose who confront him as 
youare to vilify Hillary. 


 From: "awoelflebater@...[FairfieldLife]"<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent:Friday, October 14, 20168:52 AM
Subject:[FairfieldLife] OneQuestion

 So,how is Trump'sbesmirching ofhis femaleaccusers anydifferent orbetter or 
morejustified thanHillary'sallegedattacksagainst BillClinton'saccusers? 
DoesTrump notrealize he'sdoing theexact samething heaccuses hisopponent of? 
Ihaven't seenthis pointmade anywherein the mediayet. What thehell?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers







  #yiv4903745856 #yiv4903745856 -- #yiv4903745856ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4903745856 
#yiv4903745856ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4903745856 
#yiv4903745856ygrp-mkp #yiv4903745856hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4903745856 #yiv4903745856ygrp-mkp #yiv4903745856ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4903745856 #yiv4903745856ygrp-mkp .yiv4903745856ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4903745856 #yiv4903745856ygrp-mkp .yiv4903745856ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4903745856 #yiv4903745856ygrp-mkp .yiv4903745856ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4903745856 #yiv49037458

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :

 Hey Mike!  Didn't I say a while back that if Hillary was the nominee the 
campaign would be about character and not issues?  If Bernie got the nomination 
it would be about issues?  Look at the degeneration of the American 
consciousness.  Some states (including California) you can write in a choice.  
There is a move in those states to write in Bernie as a protest vote.
 
 Of course we have our resident "shamer" troll who tries shame anyone who has a 
liberal view if they quote a "right wing source" even if that source is 
correct.  Shame on that troll!
 

 "shame" is such an old-fashioned concept. Are you Catholic?
 
 On 10/15/2016 04:51 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   If Trump fondled my balls, I wouldn't have gone public but I would have 
immediately reported it to police and asked for an investigation and police 
report verifying that I did report it.
 
 You are, apparently, unable to grasp what it takes to stand up to such 
intimidation and wealth as Trump can wield even though, in reality, he is a 
pitiable loser.
 Now you know how the Clinton sexual victims feel! What kind of power does a 
woman have against the Attorney General/ Governor of a state or a President 
have, especially when his wife sends out Lawyers from the Rose Law Firm to 
threaten and silence the victims.

 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
mailto:awoelflebater@...[FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question
 
 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are 
busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder. 
The problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost 
immediately. Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent 
till now. Trump has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and 
never accused publicly of these things and never called a racist until he ran 
against a Democrat. This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he 
supposedly did these things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a 
*patriarchal society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when 
Bill Clinton perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"
 Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of  
these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and 
compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough.
 
 
 I dare you t! o say that if Trump had fondled your balls that you would have 
gone public or legal on him. I don't believe you have the money or the chutzpah 
to have taken him on in the face of such an affront given his power and wealth. 
There is safety in numbers and it seems that at some point enough is enough for 
these women. You obviously have no idea of the kind of legal and financial sway 
he has over people. He is as eager to sic his lawyers on those who confront him 
as you are to vilify Hillary. 
 
 
 

 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question

 
   So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or 
better or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 
 
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 




 
 












 
 







 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 The hideous, diabolical truth about Hillary Clinton 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/10/14/the-hideous-diabolical-truth-about-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.db1aac6a1448
 
 
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/10/14/the-hideous-diabolical-truth-about-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.db1aac6a1448
 
 
 The hideous, diabolical truth about Hillary Clinton 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/10/14/the-hideous-diabolical-truth-about-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.db1aac6a1448
 It's been a busy life!
 
 
 
 View on www.washingtonpost... 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/10/14/the-hideous-diabolical-truth-about-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.db1aac6a1448
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Honestly Bhairitu, I don't remember that but she doesn't have a good record 
for thirty years of *pubic service*. What has she accomplished? Every thing she 
has done as Secretary of State has been a failure that has led to the worst 
refugee crisis  Western Europe has witnessed and feels guilty enough about it 
to want to bring hundreds of thousands of those refugees here.
 Zero trust worthiness. Corrupt as hell.The only way she can look any better  
is to try to tear Trump down below her, which she has the aid of the media to 
help. As Trump said, she couldn't be elected dog catcher without the support of 
the media. Check the Wikileaks e-mails to substantiate that.

 
 


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 11:29 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question
 
 
   
 Hey Mike!  Didn't I say a while back that if Hillary was the nominee the 
campaign would be about character and not issues?  If Bernie got the nomination 
it would be about issues?  Look at the degeneration of the American 
consciousness.  Some states (including California) you can write in a choice.  
There is a move in those states to write in Bernie as a protest vote.
 
 Of course we have our resident "shamer" troll who tries shame anyone who has a 
liberal view if they quote a "right wing source" even if that source is 
correct.  Shame on that troll!
 
 On 10/15/2016 04:51 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   If Trump fondled my balls, I wouldn't have gone public but I would have 
immediately reported it to police and asked for an investigation and police 
report verifying that I did report it.
 
 You are, apparently, unable to grasp what it takes to stand up to such 
intimidation and wealth as Trump can wield even though, in reality, he is a 
pitiable loser.
 Now you know how the Clinton sexual victims feel! What kind of power does a 
woman have against the Attorney General/ Governor of a state or a President 
have, especially when his wife sends out Lawyers from the Rose Law Firm to 
threaten and silence the victims.

 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
mailto:awoelflebater@...[FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are 
busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder. 
The problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost 
immediately. Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent 
till now. Trump has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and 
never accused publicly of these things and never called a racist until he ran 
against a Democrat. This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he 
supposedly did these things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a 
*patriarchal society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when 
Bill Clinton perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"
 Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of  
these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and 
compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough.
 
 
 I dare you t! o say that if Trump had fondled your balls that you would have 
gone public or legal on him. I don't believe you have the money or the chutzpah 
to have taken him on in the face of such an affront given his power and wealth. 
There is safety in numbers and it seems that at some point enough is enough for 
these women. You obviously have no idea of the kind of legal and financial sway 
he has over people. He is as eager to sic his lawyers on those who

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Honestly Bhairitu, I don't remember that but she doesn't have a good record for 
thirty years of *pubic service*. What has she accomplished? Every thing she has 
done as Secretary of State has been a failure that has led to the worst refugee 
crisis  Western Europe has witnessed and feels guilty enough about it to want 
to bring hundreds of thousands of those refugees here.Zero trust worthiness. 
Corrupt as hell.The only way she can look any better  is to try to tear Trump 
down below her, which she has the aid of the media to help. As Trump said, she 
couldn't be elected dog catcher without the support of the media. Check the 
Wikileaks e-mails to substantiate that.


  From: "Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 11:29 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question
   
 Hey Mike!  Didn't I say a while back that if Hillary was the nominee the 
campaign would be about character and not issues?  If Bernie got the nomination 
it would be about issues?  Look at the degeneration of the American 
consciousness.  Some states (including California) you can write in a choice.  
There is a move in those states to write in Bernie as a protest vote.
 
 Of course we have our resident "shamer" troll who tries shame anyone who has a 
liberal view if they quote a "right wing source" even if that source is 
correct.  Shame on that troll!
 
 On 10/15/2016 04:51 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
  
    If Trump fondled my balls, I wouldn't have gone public but I would have 
immediately reported it to police and asked for an investigation and  police 
report verifying that I did report it.
  You are, apparently, unable to grasp what it takes to stand up to such 
intimidation and wealth as Trump can wield even though, in reality, he is a 
pitiable loser.
 Now you know how the Clinton sexual victims feel! What kind of power does a 
woman have against the Attorney General/ Governor of a state or a President 
have, especially when his wife sends out Lawyers from the Rose Law Firm to 
threaten and silence the victims.
From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question
  
    
  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
 
  That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are  
busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder. 
The problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost 
immediately. Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent 
till now. Trump has been a public  figure for some thirty years or longer and 
never accused publicly of these things and never called a racist until he ran 
against a Democrat. This is their *play  book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he 
supposedly did these things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a 
*patriarchal society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah,  that's the ticket! Remember when 
Bill Clinton perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"
 Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in  some of  
these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and  
compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough. 
  I dare you t! o say that if Trump had fondled your balls  that you would have 
gone public or legal on him. I don't believe you have the  money or the 
chutzpah to have taken him on in the face of such an affront given his power 
and wealth. There is safety in numbers and it seems  that at some point enough 
is enough for these women. You obviously have no idea of the kind of legal and 
financial sway he has over people. He is  as eager to sic his lawyers on those 
who confront him as you are to vilify Hillary. 
  
 
   From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question
  
   So, how is Trump's besmirching of  his female accusers any different or 
better or more justified than  Hillary's alleged attacks  against Bill 
Clinton's  accusers? Does Trump not realize he's  doing the exact same thing he 
accuses his opponent of? I  haven't seen this point made anywhere  in the media 
yet. What the  hell? 
  
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
  
 
 
 

 
  #yiv7209768266 #yiv7209768266 -- #yiv7209768266ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv7209768266 
#yiv7209768266ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv7209768266 
#yiv720976826

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 (snip)
 
 Of course we have our resident "shamer" troll who tries shame anyone who has a 
liberal view if they quote a "right wing source" even if that source is 
correct.  Shame on that troll!
 

 Not true, Bhairitu.

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]]

Hey Mike!  Didn't I say a while back that if Hillary was the nominee the 
campaign would be about character and not issues?  If Bernie got the 
nomination it would be about issues?  Look at the degeneration of the 
American consciousness.  Some states (including California) you can 
write in a choice.  There is a move in those states to write in Bernie 
as a protest vote.


Of course we have our resident "shamer" troll who tries shame anyone who 
has a liberal view if they quote a "right wing source" even if that 
source is correct.  Shame on that troll!


On 10/15/2016 04:51 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
If Trump fondled my balls, I wouldn't have gone public but I would 
have immediately reported it to police and asked for an investigation 
and police report verifying that I did report it.
You are, apparently, unable to grasp what it takes to stand up to such 
intimidation and wealth as Trump can wield even though, in reality, he 
is a pitiable loser.
Now you know how the Clinton sexual victims feel! What kind of power 
does a woman have against the Attorney General/ Governor of a state or 
a President have, especially when his wife sends out Lawyers from the 
Rose Law Firm to threaten and silence the victims.


*From:* "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2016 11:16 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you 
are busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, 
but louder. The problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused 
him almost immediately. Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty 
years later. Silent till now. Trump has been a public figure for some 
thirty years or longer and never accused publicly of these things and 
never called a racist until he ran against a Democrat. This is their 
*play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he supposedly did these 
things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a *patriarchal 
society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when Bill 
Clinton perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"
Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in 
some of  these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias 
bias and compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says 
enough.


I dare you t! o say that if Trump had fondled your balls that you 
would have gone public or legal on him. I don't believe you have the 
money or the chutzpah to have taken him on in the face of such an 
affront given his power and wealth. There is safety in numbers and it 
seems that at some point enough is enough for these women. You 
obviously have no idea of the kind of legal and financial sway he has 
over people. He is as eager to sic his lawyers on those who confront 
him as you are to vilify Hillary.




*From:* "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] One Question

So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or 
better or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill 
Clinton's accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same 
thing he accuses his opponent of? I haven't seen this point made 
anywhere in the media yet. What the hell?


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

If Trump fondled my balls, I wouldn't have gone public but I would have 
immediately reported it to police and asked for an investigation and police 
report verifying that I did report it.
You are, apparently, unable to grasp what it takes to stand up to such 
intimidation and wealth as Trump can wield even though, in reality, he is a 
pitiable loser.
Now you know how the Clinton sexual victims feel! What kind of power does a 
woman have against the Attorney General/ Governor of a state or a President 
have, especially when his wife sends out Lawyers from the Rose Law Firm to 
threaten and silence the victims.
  From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are busted 
for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder. The 
problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost immediately. 
Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent till now. Trump 
has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and never accused 
publicly of these things and never called a racist until he ran against a 
Democrat. This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he supposedly 
did these things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a *patriarchal 
society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when Bill Clinton 
perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"
Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of  
these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and 
compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough.
I dare you to say that if Trump had fondled your balls that you would have gone 
public or legal on him. I don't believe you have the money or the chutzpah to 
have taken him on in the face of such an affront given his power and wealth. 
There is safety in numbers and it seems that at some point enough is enough for 
these women. You obviously have no idea of the kind of legal and financial sway 
he has over people. He is as eager to sic his lawyers on those who confront him 
as you are to vilify Hillary. 


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question
 
 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers


  #yiv4624530235 #yiv4624530235 -- #yiv4624530235ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4624530235 
#yiv4624530235ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4624530235 
#yiv4624530235ygrp-mkp #yiv4624530235hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4624530235 #yiv4624530235ygrp-mkp #yiv4624530235ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4624530235 #yiv4624530235ygrp-mkp .yiv4624530235ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4624530235 #yiv4624530235ygrp-mkp .yiv4624530235ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4624530235 #yiv4624530235ygrp-mkp .yiv4624530235ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4624530235 #yiv4624530235ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv4624530235ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4624530235 
#yiv4624530235ygrp-sponsor #yiv4624530235ygrp-lc #yiv4624530235hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4624530235 
#yiv4624530235ygrp-sponsor #yiv4624530235ygrp-lc .yiv4624530235ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4624530235 #yiv4624530235actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4624530235 
#yiv4624530235activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4624530235
 #yiv4624530235activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4624530235 
#yiv4624530235activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4624530235 #yiv4624530235activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4624530235 #yiv4624530235activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4624530235 #yiv4624530235activity span 
.yiv4624530235underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4624530235 
.yiv4624530235attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv4624530235 .yiv4624530235attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4624530235 .yiv4624530235attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4624530235 .yiv4624530235attach label 

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are 
busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder. 
The problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost 
immediately. Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent 
till now. Trump has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and 
never accused publicly of these things and never called a racist until he ran 
against a Democrat. This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he 
supposedly did these things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a 
*patriarchal society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when 
Bill Clinton perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"
 Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of  
these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and 
compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough.
 

 I dare you to say that if Trump had fondled your balls that you would have 
gone public or legal on him. I don't believe you have the money or the chutzpah 
to have taken him on in the face of such an affront given his power and wealth. 
There is safety in numbers and it seems that at some point enough is enough for 
these women. You obviously have no idea of the kind of legal and financial sway 
he has over people. He is as eager to sic his lawyers on those who confront him 
as you are to vilify Hillary. You are, apparently, unable to grasp what it 
takes to stand up to such intimidation and wealth as Trump can wield even 
though, in reality, he is a pitiable loser.
 


 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question
 
 
   
 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers


 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are 
busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder.
 

 Actually, that's a classic *Karl Rove* tactic.
 

 The problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost 
immediately. Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent 
till now. Trump has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and 
never accused publicly of these things
 

 I think we all know (including you) that what set off Trump's accusers was his 
flat denial in the second debate that he had ever sexually assaulted anyone, 
after having been caught bragging about doing exactly that.
 

 and never called a racist until he ran against a Democrat.
 

 Au contraire, Pierre. His racism has been a recurrent theme for as long as 
he's been a public figure:
 

 Trump Once Sued By Feds For Not Renting To Blacks 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29/donald-trump-blacks-lawsuit_n_83.html
 
 
 Trump Once Sued By Feds For Not Renting To Blacks 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29/donald-trump-blacks-lawsuit_n_83.html
 NEW YORK -- Donald Trump’s vehement questioning regarding President Obama's 
place of birth has provoked charges of racism, with a number of public figure...
 
 
 
 View on www.huffingtonpost.com 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29/donald-trump-blacks-lawsuit_n_83.html
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 Lots and lots of examples in this story.
  

 This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he supposedly did these 
things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a *patriarchal society*up 
bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when Bill Clinton perjured 
himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"

 

 That wasn't "all we heard," not by a long shot. He was condemned for his lying 
as much as for the deeds themselves.
 

 Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of  
these stories.
 

 I'm sure you can point out these "wholes," Mike. We'll wait. (You can forget 
about the no-armrest-in-first-class dodge, BTW. That's been thoroughly 
debunked.)
 

 The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and compliance and 
coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough.

 

 Wikileaks isn't "exposing" any such thing.
 

 Once again, Mike, you're doing an extremely poor job of defending your man. 
You make him look worse instead of better.
 

 

 

 
 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question
 
 
   
 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers


 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are busted 
for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder. The 
problem here is that Bill Clinton's accusers, accused him almost immediately. 
Trump's accusers, accused as much as thirty years later. Silent till now. Trump 
has been a public figure for some thirty years or longer and never accused 
publicly of these things and never called a racist until he ran against a 
Democrat. This is their *play book*. BTW, he was a Democrat when he supposedly 
did these things, thus it wasn't his fault, he was a victim of a *patriarchal 
society*up bringing. Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket! Remember when Bill Clinton 
perjured himself and all we heard was, "it's just about sex"
Also, there are wholes big enough to drive an 18 wheeler through in some of  
these stories. The fact that Wikileaks is exposing the medias bias and 
compliance and coordination with the Hillary campaign says enough.

  From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:52 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] One Question
   
    So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or 
better or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
  #yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388 -- #yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp #yiv3673122388hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp #yiv3673122388ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp .yiv3673122388ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp .yiv3673122388ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388ygrp-mkp .yiv3673122388ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv3673122388ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388ygrp-sponsor #yiv3673122388ygrp-lc #yiv3673122388hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388ygrp-sponsor #yiv3673122388ygrp-lc .yiv3673122388ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv3673122388
 #yiv3673122388activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv3673122388 
#yiv3673122388activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv3673122388 #yiv3673122388activity span 
.yiv3673122388underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3673122388 
.yiv3673122388attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv3673122388 
.yiv3673122388bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 dd.yiv3673122388last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3673122388 dd.yiv3673122388last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3673122388 
dd.yiv3673122388last p span.yiv3673122388yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388file-title a, #yiv3673122388 
div.yiv3673122388file-title a:active, #yiv3673122388 
div.yiv3673122388file-title a:hover, #yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388photo-title a, 
#yiv3673122388 div.yiv3673122388photo-title a:active, #yiv3673122388 
div.yiv3673122388photo-title a:hover, #yiv3673122388 
div.yiv3673122388photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3673122388 
div#yiv3673122388ygrp-mlmsg #yiv3673122388ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv3673122388yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv3673122388 
.yiv3673122388green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv3673122388 .yiv3673122388MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0

[FairfieldLife] One Question

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers