[FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-29 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 8/27/06 1:35 PM, nablus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  As long as the paychecks keep coming in, why should Barry stop
  posting rubbish here ? He is a young and aggressive soul that needs
  something to focus on and a father to sponsor him. He has that 
  now; so he will not stop.
 
 Hey Barry, shouldn¹t I get a commission?

The check is in the mail... :-)

BTW, here's the last post I wrote that day that I 
spent writing about my reactions to seeing FFL 
after not having read it for three weeks:



Balance

In these musings, I've said too much about the angry 
and compulsive TBs on this forum, those who are 
allowing their own self hatred to ruin their lives. 
But today I've realized that I need to say some things 
about the vast majority of the posters to Fairfield 
Life, and the obvious fact that -- in contrast -- they 
actually *have* lives, and that those lives are far 
from in ruin.

FFL has been really good for me in that it taught me 
that many of my attitudes about TM and its adherents 
were formed by too long a period spent on alt.meditation.
transcendental, where the angry compulsive TBs prevailed, 
and consistently shouted down and attempted to drive 
away any more positive voices. Fairfield Life has 
taught me that a.m.t. is the aberration, and that 
balance is more the norm among long-term practitioners 
of TM.

The examples provided here by the many folks who have 
found some sense of *balance* with regard to their many 
years of participation in TM and the TMO are nothing 
short of inspiring. These people have *not*, on the whole, 
grown bitter as a result of years of involvement with 
an organization that couldn't do more to inspire such 
bitterness if it tried.

You guys still have HOPE. The vast majority of you still 
follow a strongly spiritual path, whatever form it may 
take (even if that form involves a strong belief in 
pathlessness). I find this encouraging, and inspiring.

So this is just a short thank you note to Rick and 
Jim and Tom T. and new.morning and Sal and Ingegerd 
and cardemeister and Curtis and Dr. Pete and George 
and Mike H. and Michael and Paul and MDixon and 
scienceofabundance and Shemp and JohnY and Kirk and 
Rory and LBS and all the many others I've forgotten 
for your contributions here. Your posts consistently 
remind me that a person who has devoted years of 
their lives to TM does *not* have to turn into an 
angry, bitter old fuck. They remind me that the 
spiritual path is endless, without any of the boundaries 
that lesser seekers attempt to impose on it. Thanks to 
you all for providing a positive example of how to 
walk the walk, especially on a forum on which a few
noisy parrots do nothing but talk the talk.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-29 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
 
  on 8/27/06 1:35 PM, nablus108 at nablus108@ wrote:
  
   As long as the paychecks keep coming in, why should Barry stop
   posting rubbish here ? He is a young and aggressive soul that 
needs
   something to focus on and a father to sponsor him. He has 
that 
   now; so he will not stop.
  
  Hey Barry, shouldn¹t I get a commission?
 
 The check is in the mail... :-)
 
 BTW, here's the last post I wrote that day that I 
 spent writing about my reactions to seeing FFL 
 after not having read it for three weeks:
 
 
 
 Balance
 
 In these musings, I've said too much about the angry 
 and compulsive TBs on this forum, those who are 
 allowing their own self hatred to ruin their lives. 
 But today I've realized that I need to say some things 
 about the vast majority of the posters to Fairfield 
 Life, and the obvious fact that -- in contrast -- they 
 actually *have* lives, and that those lives are far 
 from in ruin.
 
 FFL has been really good for me in that it taught me 
 that many of my attitudes about TM and its adherents 
 were formed by too long a period spent on alt.meditation.
 transcendental, where the angry compulsive TBs prevailed, 
 and consistently shouted down and attempted to drive 
 away any more positive voices. Fairfield Life has 
 taught me that a.m.t. is the aberration, and that 
 balance is more the norm among long-term practitioners 
 of TM.
 
 The examples provided here by the many folks who have 
 found some sense of *balance* with regard to their many 
 years of participation in TM and the TMO are nothing 
 short of inspiring. These people have *not*, on the whole, 
 grown bitter as a result of years of involvement with 
 an organization that couldn't do more to inspire such 
 bitterness if it tried.
 
 You guys still have HOPE. The vast majority of you still 
 follow a strongly spiritual path, whatever form it may 
 take (even if that form involves a strong belief in 
 pathlessness). I find this encouraging, and inspiring.
 
 So this is just a short thank you note to Rick and 
 Jim and Tom T. and new.morning and Sal and Ingegerd 
 and cardemeister and Curtis and Dr. Pete and George 
 and Mike H. and Michael and Paul and MDixon and 
 scienceofabundance and Shemp and JohnY and Kirk and 
 Rory and LBS and all the many others I've forgotten 
 for your contributions here. Your posts consistently 
 remind me that a person who has devoted years of 
 their lives to TM does *not* have to turn into an 
 angry, bitter old fuck. They remind me that the 
 spiritual path is endless, without any of the boundaries 
 that lesser seekers attempt to impose on it. Thanks to 
 you all for providing a positive example of how to 
 walk the walk, especially on a forum on which a few
 noisy parrots do nothing but talk the talk.
 
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-28 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 Ah. As Maharishi would say, A perfect opportunity
 for the answer we have already prepared.  :-)
 
 

I just realized something: Barry spent his vacation
from this forum preparing a whole series of answers
offline, which then he planned to post one by one after
his return (after finding suitable segues in others'
posts, so the rants wouldn't look quite so much as if
they were prewritten).

Too bad; he had all that time, and he *still*
couldn't come up with anything new.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-28 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 snip
  Ah. As Maharishi would say, A perfect opportunity
  for the answer we have already prepared.  :-)
  
  
 
 I just realized something: Barry spent his vacation
 from this forum preparing a whole series of answers
 offline, which then he planned to post one by one after
 his return 

Yep. I was wondering why they didn't quite fit the current mood here. 
Good call.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-28 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On





on 8/27/06 1:35 PM, nablus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

As long as the paychecks keep coming in, why should Barry stop 
posting rubbish here ? He is a young and aggressive soul that needs 
something to focus on and a father to sponsor him. He has that now; 
so he will not stop.

Hey Barry, shouldnt I get a commission?

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





[FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-27 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
   
 I wasn't there, of course, but just from your quote
 I wouldn't be sure he was referring to attuning
 yourselves to his thinking in any case, so much as
 that eventually you would all be in the same state
 of consciousness he was.

In my honest and long-considered opinion, 
all of Maharishi's students have *always* 
been in the same state of consciousness 
as he is -- normal old waking state. The
problems arise when one or more of the
students start to achieve what the teacher 
never has.
   
   snore
  
  P.S.: Notice, once again, that Barry has conflated
  What MMY sez... (or in this case, What MMY
  may have meant...) with What MMY sez is true.
  
  It's really a very obvious distinction, but Barry
  simply cannot seem to make it.
  
  Could that be because the former gives him no
  opportunity to recycle his old MMY-is-a-fraud-
  and-you-stupid-TBs-believe-him mantras?
 
 Ah. As Maharishi would say, A perfect opportunity
 for the answer we have already prepared.  :-)

Actually the answer Barry had already prepared is
completely irrelevant to the point I was making.
I was commenting on *Barry's* propensity to distort
what TMers say in order to find opportunities to
deliver the same shallow rants against TMers/the
TMO/MMY, while exalting himself, over and over and
OVER again.  He hasn't said anything new in this
area for *years*, and the elaborate fantasy that
follows is no exception.

snip
 They're convinced that their view of Maharishi 
 is true and incontestable, even though many of 
 these same people have never even sat in the 
 same room with him. They're convinced that *their* 
 interpretation of the things he says is right, 
 and that anyone who interprets them differently 
 is, well, wrong.

Just to drive home the point, here's what I said
to Jim again:

I wasn't there, of course, but just from your quote
I wouldn't be sure he was referring to attuning
yourselves to his thinking in any case, so much as
that eventually you would all be in the same state
of consciousness he was.

Yup, that sure does sound like I'm convinced that
my interpretation of what Jim reported MMY to have
said was right, doesn't it?  I mean, I wouldn't
be sure is precisely synonymous with I am
convinced, right?

Barry's vacation sure seems to have helped him
clean up the habit of nastiness he was finding so
burdensome when he left:

I have also pondered the things that others
have said about my participation here, and have
come to the conclusion that they were correct.
I don't belong here; the nasty things that are
said get to me and all too often goad me into
participating in and perpetuating -- if not
deepening -- the nastiness. Kirk was right in
his decision to leave FFL, and for the right
reasons. He found many of the discussions here,
the way they are handled, and the mindset of
the 'handlers' too heartbreaking for him to
endure. He wisely moved on. I join him in that
decision, and in the quest for people who more
closely share my own sensibilities.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-27 Thread curtisdeltablues

First, welcome back Turq.  I missed your sense of humor and interest
in discussing topics in detail.  You have been posting some thoughtful
stuff.  There are a few posters here who stretch my thinking beyond my
own current boundaries and that is what I am here for.  Otherwise I
would just hang out with Secular Humanists rather than be challenged.
 I am always seeking ways to discuss beliefs that I do not share,
surrounded by enough humor to make it enjoyable.  I have heard that
the single best predictor of a therapist's success is the level of
rapport established.  That certainly is true for me when it comes to
discussions of beliefs. There are a number of poster heres who pull it
off very well, and when it works it is really great.  So, having
poured us a bit of  Campari, I begin.

Your discussion of TM beliefs being clung to, contrasted with the
experience of going beyond boundaries in meditation made me think.  I
have come to the conclusion that the belief system is more critical to
the TM experience than MMY's claim of the experience of the
transcendent and the higher states being self-evident, imply.  This is
also a part of his own teaching of course, but not emphasized in this
way.  I think it goes beyond the usual knowledge supporting experience
teaching of TM.  My evidence for this is that we know that most people
who started TM dropped it, by a huge margin.  I conducted a campaign
in the DC center to find out what had happened to the 10,000 people
who were initiated in the center and it came out to be a tiny percent
continued to meditate.   The ones who continued mostly had a
continuing interaction with the knowledge and the belief structure
as well as the social system, the supportive group.  The more time
they spent building the beliefs, the more likely they were to
continue. Some people seem to drop out after deep involvement because
they couldn't take the movement's strong arm tactics and general
bullshittery. Many of the people who had a deep commitment and left
after years took on new beliefs that brought them beyond the party
line and that lead them out of the ability to stay within the
movement's rules and guidelines.  If they continued with a belief
system that supported the experience of higher states, then they
might start other spiritual practices which had a form of meditation
or they combined the teachings. If they dropped that model completely,
as in my case, they might not continue on any traditional spiritual
path at all.

Although some in the movement had tried to paint me as a disgruntled
member when I left, to neutralize the damage, nothing could be further
from the truth.  Nothing we have discussed in this group about the
deceptions or shitty treatment by the movement phased me when I was in
it, because the experience (combined with the belief system) was worth
it all. But once I had decided that the belief system was
fundamentally flawed, my value of the experience completely changed. 
I could still have an experience of unboundedness, but it meant
nothing.  The experience's bliss and compelling nature is not inherent
in the experience.  It is tied to it value from the belief.  I
actually never missed a program in 15 years, but when it switched off
I never desired it again.  It wasn't just because I was compulsive
with TM, I craved the state twice a day.  But now the desire is
totally gone.

Because I had such an intense exposure I can drift into the state
naturally if I close my eyes, but it doesn't have any charm for me. 
It seems to take away more than it gives, and I no longer view that
state as an experience of my Self.  For me it takes away what I value
of myself.  But when I go out in the middle of a lake in my kayak I
often close my eyes and listen to nature and can float in thoughts
that seem to take me beyond my ordinary thought patterns.  The
contemplation that I used to put down as merely thinking level
activity, can have a great value for my regaining perspective, and
seems to be a good state to plan my future.  It is an active state of
mind, but the organization of what senses I am paying attention to
seem re-arranged.  So I am opened to some type of meditation being
valuable for me in short doses.  But not the state that TM brings, and
without all the belief system structure that I am experiencing the
deeper truth of life.  I think some altered states are another useful
state of mind in short doses, but not all altered states.  I can see
how many people who left TM were attracted to Buddhist practices
although I don't know too much about them.

If a person is really impulsive then TM may give enough dissociation
to restore more choice for a person and I am opened to that value from
TM for some people.  But in my experience, that is the person who is
the least likely to continue with TM.  People like myself who might
generously be called creative types, are already pretty dissociated,
so a lot of TM sends me beyond the (now demoted) planet Pluto.  For
people 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-27 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This is my life, not
 an anti-TM rant.

If anyone understands that, it's me.

But you know as well as I do that
several people here are going to see
it as an anti-TM rant. That just means
that encountering a different set of
experiences and beliefs than their own
causes them to feel attacked, not that 
you're attacking them.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-27 Thread curtisdeltablues
The squeakiest wheel doesn't always need any grease.  I have learned a
lot posting here.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  This is my life, not
  an anti-TM rant.
 
 If anyone understands that, it's me.
 
 But you know as well as I do that
 several people here are going to see
 it as an anti-TM rant. That just means
 that encountering a different set of
 experiences and beliefs than their own
 causes them to feel attacked, not that 
 you're attacking them.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-27 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 Your discussion of TM beliefs being clung to, contrasted
 with the experience of going beyond boundaries in meditation
 made me think.  I have come to the conclusion that the belief
 system is more critical to the TM experience than MMY's claim
 of the experience of the transcendent and the higher states
 being self-evident, imply.

FWIW, as another data point, my experience has been
that the longer I meditate, the less dependent I am
on MMY's metaphysical teaching, and the more
experientially aware I become that all metaphysical
teaching ultimately breaks down into infinite 
regress and paradox.  The metaphysical teaching is
the right tool for the job in the begining, but it
becomes less and less so as consciousness develops
via repeated transcending.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Letting Go / Hanging On

2006-08-27 Thread nablus108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:

  I wasn't there, of course, but just from your quote
  I wouldn't be sure he was referring to attuning
  yourselves to his thinking in any case, so much as
  that eventually you would all be in the same state
  of consciousness he was.
 
 In my honest and long-considered opinion, 
 all of Maharishi's students have *always* 
 been in the same state of consciousness 
 as he is -- normal old waking state. The
 problems arise when one or more of the
 students start to achieve what the teacher 
 never has.

snore
   
   P.S.: Notice, once again, that Barry has conflated
   What MMY sez... (or in this case, What MMY
   may have meant...) with What MMY sez is true.
   
   It's really a very obvious distinction, but Barry
   simply cannot seem to make it.
   
   Could that be because the former gives him no
   opportunity to recycle his old MMY-is-a-fraud-
   and-you-stupid-TBs-believe-him mantras?
  
  Ah. As Maharishi would say, A perfect opportunity
  for the answer we have already prepared.  :-)
 
 Actually the answer Barry had already prepared is
 completely irrelevant to the point I was making.
 I was commenting on *Barry's* propensity to distort
 what TMers say in order to find opportunities to
 deliver the same shallow rants against TMers/the
 TMO/MMY, while exalting himself, over and over and
 OVER again.  He hasn't said anything new in this
 area for *years*, and the elaborate fantasy that
 follows is no exception.
 
 snip
  They're convinced that their view of Maharishi 
  is true and incontestable, even though many of 
  these same people have never even sat in the 
  same room with him. They're convinced that *their* 
  interpretation of the things he says is right, 
  and that anyone who interprets them differently 
  is, well, wrong.
 
 Just to drive home the point, here's what I said
 to Jim again:
 
 I wasn't there, of course, but just from your quote
 I wouldn't be sure he was referring to attuning
 yourselves to his thinking in any case, so much as
 that eventually you would all be in the same state
 of consciousness he was.
 
 Yup, that sure does sound like I'm convinced that
 my interpretation of what Jim reported MMY to have
 said was right, doesn't it?  I mean, I wouldn't
 be sure is precisely synonymous with I am
 convinced, right?
 
 Barry's vacation sure seems to have helped him
 clean up the habit of nastiness he was finding so
 burdensome when he left:
 
 I have also pondered the things that others
 have said about my participation here, and have
 come to the conclusion that they were correct.
 I don't belong here; the nasty things that are
 said get to me and all too often goad me into
 participating in and perpetuating -- if not
 deepening -- the nastiness. Kirk was right in
 his decision to leave FFL, and for the right
 reasons. He found many of the discussions here,
 the way they are handled, and the mindset of
 the 'handlers' too heartbreaking for him to
 endure. He wisely moved on. I join him in that
 decision, and in the quest for people who more
 closely share my own sensibilities.

As long as the paychecks keep coming in, why should Barry stop 
posting rubbish here ? He is a young and aggressive soul that needs 
something to focus on and a father to sponsor him. He has that now; 
so he will not stop.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/