By suspending Habeas Corpus the foundation of the
judicial system takes a terrible blow. Unlike what
some posters have mentioned, one is not proven
innocent in a court of law, one is proven NOT GUILTY.
There is a presumption of innocence and the
prosecution attempts to establish the defendant's
In a message dated 12/2/05 10:17:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However
I think it is already something a judge can do if they think
the suspected person is a "flight" risk.Uh, no. A judge
can refuse to grant bail, but thatisn't what's involved
here.
In a message dated 12/2/05 11:36:56 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Capital
criminals of any kind, caught in the act, can be shot to prevent them from
concluding the act. After-the-fact, if they are captured, due process
applies just as it always does. Even in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 10:17:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However I think it is already something a judge can do if they
think the suspected person is a flight risk.
Uh, no. A judge
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 11:36:56 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Capital criminals of any kind, caught in the act, can be shot to
prevent them from concluding the act. After-the-fact, if they are
In a message dated 12/3/05 11:23:14 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In
this case to an attorney. Letting an attorney be present at all
interrogations I believe and also handle his clients legal
rights.Did you read the article I cited? I think it'll
In a message dated 12/2/05 8:46:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are
certainly moving toward fascism. The Patriot Act, the attempt to
repeal Habeas Corpus, the new bankruptcy law, censorship in the
media, etc. So you would rather live under a rule of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 8:46:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are certainly moving toward fascism. The Patriot Act, the
attempt to repeal Habeas Corpus, the new bankruptcy law,
In a message dated 12/2/05 9:23:57 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(I think
you both mean *prosecution*, not "persecution."Hopefully we all agree
persecution is not a good thing.)The problem is that denying habaeus
corpus to *suspected*terrorists means that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 8:46:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are certainly moving toward fascism. The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 9:23:57 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(I think you both mean *prosecution*, not persecution.
Hopefully we all agree persecution is not a good thing.)
The problem is that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 8:46:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are certainly moving toward fascism. The Patriot Act, the
attempt to
repeal Habeas Corpus, the new bankruptcy law,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 9:23:57 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(I think you both mean *prosecution*, not persecution.
In a message dated 12/1/05 3:03:28 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
Vietnamese were fighting to get their country back after years of
colonialism (now we do a lot of trade with them). We did the same
here and would again if invaded (well if we could drag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/1/05 3:03:28 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Vietnamese were fighting to get their country back after years of
colonialism (now we do a lot of trade with them). We did the same here
and would again if invaded
In a message dated 12/1/05 1:38:31 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You seem
to be a bit confused to whom you are replying. The thread shows a
reply to Jason though it is to my post. As for stealing the oil Bush
said "don't burn the oil fields"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/1/05 1:38:31 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You seem to be a bit confused to whom you are replying. The thread
shows a reply to Jason though it is to my post. As for stealing the oil
Bush said don't burn the oil
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/1/05 1:38:31 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You seem to be a bit confused to whom you are replying. The
thread
shows a reply to Jason
Dixôn, I supported Geôrge Bush.Jr and his Wâr because I felt there were WMD in Irâq and a démocraticIrâq would free up the Âmerican army tied up in Sâudi Ârabia. However, unseen évolutionary forces are at work. The age of the industrial wâr is over. The last time a wâr
In a message dated 11/30/05 8:08:40 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The last time a wâr decisively
solved a conflict is the 'Sécond world
wâr'.
Jedi, love the bold type. But are you sure this is correct?
North invasion of South Vietnam decisively ended that war
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/30/05 8:08:40 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The last time a wâr decisively solved a conflict is the 'Sécond
world wâr'.
Jedi, love the bold type. But are you sure this is
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:03:24 EST Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Mr. M.DIXON?Right on DIXON CORRECTso is RUSHJedi, love the bold type. But are you sure this is correct? North invasion of South Vietnam decisively ended that war in favor of the North in days. Invasion of I
In a message dated 11/30/05 9:35:02 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Was it a Victory in
Vietnam.?? Three million Skulls.? Agent Orange and birth defects
and juvenile Cancer.??
Invasion or
Iraq in 1991.?? American troops called the Iraqi population to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/30/05 9:35:02 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Was it a Victory in Vietnam.?? Three million Skulls.? Agent
Orange and birth defects and juvenile Cancer.??*
**
*Invasion or Iraq in 1991.??
24 matches
Mail list logo
