RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-22 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of dhamiltony2k5
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:25 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments
 
  
300 children.

Is there anyone left inside MIU that could explain the spiritual facts of
life to these unruly children and those outsiders who agitate them?
Bring back Jerry Jarvis?
He's back. He'll be giving a lecture at the Santa Monica library sometime
soon.
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-13 Thread Vaj


On Oct 12, 2009, at 9:56 PM, off_world_beings wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:


 On Oct 12, 2009, at 8:07 PM, yifuxero wrote:

  The bottom line is that we can (a) transcend changes, or (b) make
  changes.
  The evidence for the making changes part simply isn't there!
  I therefore agree with the other contributor. The connections are
  tenuous.
  There could actually be a negative payoff, in certain  
circumstances;

  although by no means approaching the levels suggested by Vaj.
  Usually, people just quit since they haven't seen any results.


 I would beg to differ--I'd actually propose mental worship and/or
 meditation on an ishta-devata (e.g simple mental mantra recitation)
 can bring and is believed to bring relative benefits. YMMV. The
 question is: when someone isn't aware that the relative benefit is
 essentially a boon from a inner goddess radiating her effects via
 your nervous system onto your connection with the outer world; when
 that inner level of intention is missing through deception, does it
 work or does it work as well (as if you knew you were reciting,  
say, a

 mantra to the goddess of wisdom and inspired speech)? Or can the
 deception block that relative effect?

 IME teachers who simply ask their students what are you looking  
for,
 or what do you want in life and then give a mantra for that  
benefit,

 at least the student has some involvement at the level of intention.
 They are aligned with the benefit. If the student is left in the  
dark,

 that specific intention is left as an ambiguity.


Seeking benefits is stupid.
Meditate and enjoy, that is Maharishi's advice.


No need to seek, but it's good to be aware.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-13 Thread Vaj


On Oct 12, 2009, at 10:17 PM, yifuxero wrote:

o bring up an example: I've been chanting mantras (japa - outloud or  
silently but separate from TM); since 1972 when I got my GOHONZON at  
a Buddhist Temple in Etiwanda, CA. With TM, relative benefits are  
supposedly a byproduct (although unpredictable) of a more relaxed  
nervous system. There's only a tenuous connection between  
transcendence and activity since one can attribute relative  
changes to the relaxation.

Possibly, one might transcend and start reading books on Advaita.


Calm states or transcending are not unusual with mantra recitation IME.

OTOH, people in the Nichiren School - like myself - don't separate  
Spiritual from material, since the Founder - Nichiren, made no such  
distinction and in fact spent a lifetime criticizing orthodox  
Buddhism for that very reason: Orthodox Buddhism creates a monkish  
lifestyle while retreating from activity (and I might add - begging  
for alms).


This is a common misunderstanding. There are red sanghas (monks) and  
their are white sanghas (married). I don't know that one is superior  
to the other, although different cultures may view that differently,  
often out of sentimentality.


MMY has addressed the question of householder vs monk orientations  
but imo failed to come up with the goods. Back to you Vaj. What are  
you quibbling about now? I forgot. You'll find something to nitpick  
about.


Re-read the post.

Anyway, I'm making the following assertions: a. transcendence has  
unproven/demonstrated value in relation to the multitude of claims  
made by the TMO; but b. one can point to restful alertness as a  
valuable state of body-mind, IRRESPECTIVE of which technique induces  
the state. Thus, fewer ulcers, etc; clearer thinking...but
c. In regard to making correct (Dharmic); productive actions, silent  
meditation if done in excess might be counterproductive - thus, BN:  
Bliss Ninnies or those who might borrow $$ to attend Mother Divine  
Courses.


OK...

My solution since 1972 has been to chant various mantras of Hindu  
and Buddhist origin; but I make no distinction between the WISDOM  
purpose and other purposes for chanting.


Well, presumably they're different beings. A distinction worth  
understanding.


Indeed, if you google the Green Tara, you will find a long shopping  
list of Green Tara practice benefits, all intermingled, with no  
distinguishing the Wisdom aspect from the material benefits.
The person making such a false dichotomy is you, Vaj, since your  
Guru Norbu does it! (makes such a distinction). He's obviously not a  
devotee of the Green Tara. For example: Among the 21 Tara mantras,  
#11 addresses and counteracts the vil caused by robbers. #14 averts  
evil affecting cattle, #16 that of poison, and so on. But #7 is the  
Tara who increases Wisdom.


I've not heard of this alleged, false dichotomy you mention. But since  
his previous incarnation left a terma relating to various Taras, it  
doesn't sound like you know what you're talking about.


Thus, certain Buddhist schools such as Nichiren's make no  
distinction between various types of desires: material vs Spiritual.
Neo-Advaitins typically make a distinction and attempt to capitalize  
on the supposed difference.
Andrew Cohen is an odd character. He and his friend Ken Wilber tout  
evolutionary Consciousness and then beg for money. One of his  
followers called me at work. I basically told her to get lost and  
said that her Guru was a hypocrite.
I therefore respectfully disagree with any Guru who makes the Wisdom  
vs material dichotomy; and give credit where it's due: to MMY for at  
least ATTEMPTING to fuse the two. Unfortunately his (TMO) claims for  
material benefits have not panned out -whether the supposed results  
be due to relaxation or transcendence or Yagyas.


Never heard of the union of wisdom and method or the inseparability of  
the three bodies (kayas)? You really don't seem familiar with  
vajrayana/mantrayana but you claim to practice it. Odd.


Generally the reason a distinction is made between the kayas or  
various unified-pairs is because either paradox is not generally  
comprehended by those without recognition of the nondual View, i.e.  
the type of audience to which such speech would typically be addressed  
and linear speech is the best way to convey it relatively (i.e. we're  
limited by certain relative constraints with dualistic speech).





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Vaj


On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:22 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:

My first reaction to the fascinating post below is that ever since  
the advent of all the extras that the TMO sells and emphasizes  
these days -- schtapatyaveda, ayurveda, yagyas, sidhis, etc. etc.  
-- has, simply, watered down the core message of TM.


Bad rationale. I bet the students still get the same spiel they used  
to: boring SCI, and a required set of interdisciplinary courses  
filled with quantum nonsense that are simply transparent cult-crap to  
todays savvy students--even if they do try to censor the web from them.


They just don't fall for it like the glassy-eyed rounders of yesteryear.

Not only are people NOT starting TM in droves they way they did in  
the '70s but those that do start, such as the students described  
here, don't put much priority on it BECAUSE THE TMO DOESN'T EITHER.


Bullshit. TM is still the central core of their consciousness-based  
scam. In fact the sidhis don't even work (that is, if you believe  
they work at all) without TM.

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of ShempMcGurk
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 12:01 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments
 
  
I don't understand what or who mud people are.

Please elaborate.
It's a racial slur against dark-skinned people. 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.r...@... wrote:

 On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:22 PM, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
  My first reaction to the fascinating post below is that ever since the
advent of all the extras that the TMO sells and emphasizes these days --
schtapatyaveda, ayurveda, yagyas, sidhis, etc. etc. -- has, simply, watered
down the core message of TM.  Not only are people NOT starting TM in droves
they way they did in the '70s but those that do start, such as the students
described here, don't put much priority on it BECAUSE THE TMO DOESN'T
EITHER.  I mean, how can they when the message is watered down with all this
other stuff.  You can't say out of one side of your mouth that capturing the
fort with 20 minutes of TM is all you need to have access to the goldmines
that are in control of the fort and then, out of the other side of your
mouth, sell and promote all those goldmines as extras.  Something's gotta
give, and in this case it's TM.
 
 
 TM meditators were in the eyes of Maharishi lower than whale shit. I
 remember how low I was. Locked out of courses, couldn't see tapes,
 which tapes I can't understand why they need to be kept from the whale
 shit. Couldn't attend meetings, WPAs. It got down to a residence
 course a year offered at MIU if you were lucky. And the residence
 courses were offered for rising sidhas and as infomercials for the
 sidhis.
 
 So MUM can't have it both ways. There's no equation to factor
 meditators into the Dome numbers. The TMers don't count.
 Furthermore, when I go to the mens dorms, I don't see a single white
 face. Well, now there's one, an RA who's on IA. They are all mud
 people who came here because someone else was paying. These people
 don't give a shit for MUM, Fairfield, Iowa, the United States or TM.
 They came to get what they could because they couldn't join a pirate
 ship or score it big spending spam as a solicitor looking to smuggle
 money out of their countries.
 
 
 Arise, wretched of the earth
 Arise, convicts of hunger
 Reason thunders in its crater
 This is the eruption of the end
 Of the past let us wipe the slate clean
 Enslaved masses, arise, arise
 The world is about to change its foundation
 We are nothing, let us be all
 This is the final struggle
 Let us group together, and tomorrow The Internationale
 Will be the human race.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Vaj


On Oct 12, 2009, at 9:08 AM, feste37 wrote:

Have to agree with Doug here. When I was at MUM, the TM practice  
was considered a course, just like any other. It was a required  
course. Students saying they are being forced to meditate is  
absurd. It's like students at another uni saying they are forced  
to take a course in the humanities, or forced to take English  
composition, in order to graduate. If you don't like the mandatory  
courses at a college, go somewhere else, but don't whine about  
being forced to take them.



Man were you brainwashed!

They may pass TM off as a course, but a course isn't something you  
repeat en masse two times a day for the rest of your college years. A  
course is also something where you are taught the state of the art  
for a certain relative truth. It is not something where you are  
supposed to be deliberately deceived as to what's going down!  
Normally you take your course, pass it and you move on. At MIU/MUM if  
you do not comply to daily trance induction, you're kicked out. As a  
mandatory element, daily, for years, it was a thought-reform exercise  
for those not into it (i.e. 90% on the current MUM student body).


For we know that the hypnotized never lie,
 Do ya?

-Pete Townsend
We Won't Get Fooled Again

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread It's just a ride
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com wrot



   *From:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
 fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *ShempMcGurk
 *Sent:* Monday, October 12, 2009 12:01 AM
 *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments




 **

 I don't understand what or who mud people are.

 Please elaborate.

 It's a racial slur against dark-skinned people.


Wrong.  It's part of the beliefs of a Christian sect.  The sect follows the
Christian Identity Beliefs, vis
http://www.rickross.com/reference/christian_identity/christianidentity10.html

or

  http://tinyurl.com/3ybxd .  Rick is getting racism confused with religious
beliefs, which beliefs are protected by the Bill of Rights of the US
Constitution.**


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Vaj


On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:09 AM, ShempMcGurk wrote:




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:

[snip]

 Man were you brainwashed!

[snip]

On a daily basis, Vajina, you insist on telling us how badly we  
TMers were brainwashed by the TMO.



I have only occasionally made this remark, and it is not one I like  
to make. I do not make it every day. You're exaggerating.


Yes, I suppose the TMO has and continues still to brainwash and,  
yes, I suppose there are a certain contingent of TBers that will  
drink the kool-aid any chance they get.


But to paint the ENTIRE meditating population -- even those of us  
that went to MIU or were teachers -- is silly. If we were  
brainwashed as much as you suggest we were, we'd all still be in  
the TMO...and certainly not posting on a rogue forum such as this.




I don't consider involvement in the TMO a prerequisite for being  
thought reformed or brainwashed. In fact, it seems like the majority  
of the brainwashed people here do not have an involvement in the TMO.  
So clearly, your assumption seems false, to me.


Perhaps it was YOU who was brainwashed and you assume everyone else  
was like you? Why else would you keep insisting upon it...and to do  
it with such ferocity and so consistently for these many years --  
nay, decades -- in itself suggests a kind of brainwashing, I suggest.




I am responding to the topics as they arise. It probably would be a  
good idea to find a more scientifically based term than brainwashed.  
Let me think about it a little more. Thanks.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Bhairitu
Vaj wrote:

 On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:09 AM, ShempMcGurk wrote:



 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:

 [snip]

  Man were you brainwashed!

 [snip]

 On a daily basis, Vajina, you insist on telling us how badly we TMers 
 were brainwashed by the TMO.


 I have only occasionally made this remark, and it is not one I like to 
 make. I do not make it every day. You're exaggerating.

 Yes, I suppose the TMO has and continues still to brainwash and, yes, 
 I suppose there are a certain contingent of TBers that will drink the 
 kool-aid any chance they get.

 But to paint the ENTIRE meditating population -- even those of us 
 that went to MIU or were teachers -- is silly. If we were brainwashed 
 as much as you suggest we were, we'd all still be in the TMO...and 
 certainly not posting on a rogue forum such as this.


 I don't consider involvement in the TMO a prerequisite for being 
 thought reformed or brainwashed. In fact, it seems like the majority 
 of the brainwashed people here do not have an involvement in the TMO. 
 So clearly, your assumption seems false, to me.


I don't know when you became involved with TM but I noted that the 
cultish aspects only began to appear towards the end of the 70's.  I 
wasn't much troubled because I wasn't looked upon as someone to knock 
the local shakers and movers off their thrown.  I only learned of some 
of their fanaticism years later.  After 1982 I didn't have much contract 
with the movement outside of their ayurvedic introductory lecture in 
1985 that they charged $185 for and should have been free.  That was it 
for me.

At least where I was the TM centers were pretty easy going in the mid 
1970s and a fun social group to hang out with.  We saw real cults all 
around and steered clear of those.  Even the president of my high school 
had a cult going in the Northwest.  Pretty funny.

When I went to TTC I had been informed of the minefields to be found 
there and steered clear of them.  Some of the professionals in my 
group almost got bumped off the course because they didn't  like the 
rules.  I played the game and in Maharishi parlance got the goods. :-D





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Vaj


On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Bhairitu wrote:


 I don't consider involvement in the TMO a prerequisite for being
 thought reformed or brainwashed. In fact, it seems like the majority
 of the brainwashed people here do not have an involvement in the  
TMO.

 So clearly, your assumption seems false, to me.


I don't know when you became involved with TM but I noted that the
cultish aspects only began to appear towards the end of the 70's. I
wasn't much troubled because I wasn't looked upon as someone to knock
the local shakers and movers off their thrown. I only learned of  
some
of their fanaticism years later. After 1982 I didn't have much  
contract

with the movement outside of their ayurvedic introductory lecture in
1985 that they charged $185 for and should have been free. That was it
for me.

At least where I was the TM centers were pretty easy going in the mid
1970s and a fun social group to hang out with. We saw real cults all
around and steered clear of those. Even the president of my high  
school

had a cult going in the Northwest. Pretty funny.

When I went to TTC I had been informed of the minefields to be found
there and steered clear of them. Some of the professionals in my
group almost got bumped off the course because they didn't like the
rules. I played the game and in Maharishi parlance got the  
goods. :-D


It became acutely obvious to me as the first people I knew came back  
from (then) MIU. TTC folks learned to hide it well or be gone. One of  
the most disturbing was the unspoken caste system where wealth = more  
support of nature = more evolved. And conversely less money = less  
support of nature = less evolved. Of course Fairfield has to be the  
only place I know where Utopia was a trailer park. :-)

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Vaj


On Oct 12, 2009, at 5:01 PM, jpgillam wrote:


 The faculty are about 90% devotees, so their
 attempts to impose their values on the students
 weren't working. The university is trying to
 translate this assessment into practical steps
 to become more relevant and appealing to
 students.

I immersed myself in the TM organization because
I wanted to make things happen in my life and the
world, and I embraced Maharishi's selling point
that transcending influences relative life. Is the
connection between transcending and success really
so tenuous that the dreamers and entrepreneurs are
not sold on its value?


Are you honestly just realizing this now?

It seems like the writing has been on the wall for sometime now, the  
importing of foreign students on corporate-sponsored job visas, the  
disreputable research has been known at least since the early 80's,  
the growing separation between true believers and people who think  
they're just getting a holistic education (only to find a more cultish  
mindset), etc.


When it became glaringly obvious was around the time of MMY's death  
when people began flocking to Vlodrop. The pictures looked like a day  
trip from an old folks home by and large, with a few grandkids  
straggling along. After the true believers aged, and their kids were  
grown, there was no one really left.


So they tried to go after the green/sustainable student market.  
Unfortunately for them, these kids turned out to be way too savvy for  
MUM and the TMO IMO.



If such is the case, the
faculty's course of action seems clear to me:
establish the connection, through research and
personal example. If they cannot make the connection,
the University has no reason to exist.


Unfortunately their scientific reputation is already quite bad, so  
barring something really good suddenly happening, it would be  
unrealistic to place any hope there. Their main hope for survival it  
seems is to tone down the Vedic crapola, drop the siddhis, promote TM,  
come clean on what it really is and push the sustainability and green  
aspects in a mainstream (not vedic) way--and/or whore off corporate  
visas should they remain. IMO the real future for the TM org is more  
likely South America, where a more superstitious population, less  
educated in general and hidden from much of the dirty laundry via a  
language gap which hides  what's already gone down.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:44 PM, ruthsimplicity wrote:
 I am just stopping in for a quick visit, after Vaj let me know about  
 this development.

 I note the number of suck it up posts.  I wouldn't be surprised if  
 that was what had been done for years by the disenchanted.  Now the  
 student population has changed.  Too many students no longer care  
 about meditation.   They come to MUM primarily for reasons other  
 than TM--foreign students interested in the computer courses, others  
 interested in the environmental programs. Students talk, they get a  
 feel of the lay of the land, and then they do a petition. Students  
 are idealists.  This is the kind of thing they do.   They could have  
 been kicked out, which would be in accordance with the rules.  But  
 there were too many of them.  If the survey Rick mentions correctly  
 states the attitudes of MUM students, unless MUM bends there will be  
 no more university.

 I wonder what the current drop out rate is?

Oh there is no drop-out rate, Ruth.
The university doesn't allow that--
they just kill em first. :)

  There just isn't many new generation true believers in the United  
 States. Look at who pisses and moans about TM pro and con on the  
 net--a bunch of 50 plus year olds. Are there any new up and coming  
 researchers or are most of them 60 year old TBs? Who is Orme- 
 Johnson's successor?  I would shed no tears if MUM went belly up.  
 But MUM trustees may have enough sense to realize that survival  
 depends on being more secular.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Vaj wrote:

Unfortunately their scientific reputation is already quite bad, so  
barring something really good suddenly happening, it would be  
unrealistic to place any hope there. Their main hope for survival it  
seems is to tone down the Vedic crapola, drop the siddhis, promote  
TM, come clean on what it really is and push the sustainability and  
green aspects in a mainstream (not vedic) way--and/or whore off  
corporate visas should they remain. IMO the real future for the TM  
org is more likely South America, where a more superstitious  
population, less educated in general and hidden from much of the  
dirty laundry via a language gap which hides  what's already gone  
down.


And if even that doesn't work out, I
have a suggestion for them:  robots.
I mean, why the hell not?  For one
thing, it would use up  a lot
of scrap metal--and that's sustainability,
right?  And for another, there'd be
no problem with programming them,
which would figure into their computer
science dept.
No problem with kids or pets either.
I can see a great future for the
university going this route.

Sal



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Vaj


On Oct 12, 2009, at 7:44 PM, jpgillam wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:

 On Oct 12, 2009, at 5:01 PM, jpgillam wrote:

   The faculty are about 90% devotees, so their
   attempts to impose their values on the students
   weren't working. The university is trying to
   translate this assessment into practical steps
   to become more relevant and appealing to
   students.
 
  I immersed myself in the TM organization because
  I wanted to make things happen in my life and the
  world, and I embraced Maharishi's selling point
  that transcending influences relative life. Is the
  connection between transcending and success really
  so tenuous that the dreamers and entrepreneurs are
  not sold on its value?

 Are you honestly just realizing this now?

Forgive me; realizing what? That the connection
between transcending and success is indeed tenuous?
Or that the MUM faculty have done a poor job of
communicating that connection? Or of making that
connection? Please clarify.



Are you just realizing that MUM is no longer a TM school, teaching TM  
ideals to people who are actually interested in TM, SCI or Vedism?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-12 Thread Vaj


On Oct 12, 2009, at 8:07 PM, yifuxero wrote:

The bottom line is that we can (a) transcend changes, or (b) make  
changes.

The evidence for the making changes part simply isn't there!
I therefore agree with the other contributor. The connections are  
tenuous.
There could actually be a negative payoff, in certain circumstances;  
although by no means approaching the levels suggested by Vaj.

Usually, people just quit since they haven't seen any results.



I would beg to differ--I'd actually propose mental worship and/or  
meditation on an ishta-devata (e.g simple mental mantra recitation)  
can bring and is believed to bring relative benefits. YMMV. The  
question is: when someone isn't aware that the relative benefit is  
essentially a boon from a inner goddess radiating her effects via  
your nervous system onto your connection with the outer world; when  
that inner level of intention is missing through deception, does it  
work or does it work as well (as if you knew you were reciting, say, a  
mantra to the goddess of wisdom and inspired speech)? Or can the  
deception block that relative effect?


IME teachers who simply ask their students what are you looking for,  
or what do you want in life and then give a mantra for that benefit,  
at least the student has some involvement at the level of intention.  
They are aligned with the benefit. If the student is left in the dark,  
that specific intention is left as an ambiguity.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-11 Thread It's just a ride
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:22 PM, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@netscape.net wrote:
 My first reaction to the fascinating post below is that ever since the advent 
 of all the extras that the TMO sells and emphasizes these days -- 
 schtapatyaveda, ayurveda, yagyas, sidhis, etc. etc. -- has, simply, watered 
 down the core message of TM.  Not only are people NOT starting TM in droves 
 they way they did in the '70s but those that do start, such as the students 
 described here, don't put much priority on it BECAUSE THE TMO DOESN'T EITHER. 
  I mean, how can they when the message is watered down with all this other 
 stuff.  You can't say out of one side of your mouth that capturing the fort 
 with 20 minutes of TM is all you need to have access to the goldmines that 
 are in control of the fort and then, out of the other side of your mouth, 
 sell and promote all those goldmines as extras.  Something's gotta give, 
 and in this case it's TM.


TM meditators were in the eyes of Maharishi lower than whale shit.  I
remember how low I was.  Locked out of courses, couldn't see tapes,
which tapes I can't understand why they need to be kept from the whale
shit.  Couldn't attend meetings, WPAs.  It got down to a residence
course a year offered at MIU if you were lucky.  And the residence
courses were offered for rising sidhas and as infomercials for the
sidhis.

So MUM can't have it both ways.  There's no equation to factor
meditators into the Dome numbers.  The TMers don't count.
Furthermore, when I go to the mens dorms, I don't see a single white
face.  Well, now there's one, an RA who's on IA.  They are all mud
people who came here because someone else was paying.  These people
don't give a shit for MUM, Fairfield, Iowa, the United States or TM.
They came to get what they could because they couldn't join a pirate
ship or score it big spending spam as a solicitor looking to smuggle
money out of their countries.


Arise, wretched of the earth
Arise, convicts of hunger
Reason thunders in its crater
This is the eruption of the end
Of the past let us wipe the slate clean
Enslaved masses, arise, arise
The world is about to change its foundation
We are nothing, let us be all
This is the final struggle
Let us group together, and tomorrow  The Internationale
Will be the human race.