RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
LOL, I kind of like that: utterly hopeless nitwit. I guess we're both bonkers! Now Dudy, think carefully, did I really claim to turq that you insisted etc. or did I make a little joke to him? From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:32 AM Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Share fumbles the ball (again): Judy, you've gone totally bonkers. Again! Not only did I not call you a liar, but when turq called you that, I actually replied to him that you changed your mind and I did not consider that lying. I was defending you not trying to *get* you! You utterly hopeless nitwit. I'm talking about your idiotic post to Barry claiming I insisted on using the definite article for "HuffPo," and the subsequent exchange in which you said you didn't think I was telling the truth when I explained what your stupid mistake was. From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:05 AM Subject: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Ann wrote: Who wants an apology? I think the lady was looking for factual back up of Xeno's assertions about her. No, this was actually about Share having made one of her idiotic bloopers trying to "get" me in a post to Barry, then resisting the facts tooth and nail, making mistake after mistake, to the point of calling me a liar, then claiming I wasn't "balanced." I observed that she hadn't apologized for all the mistakes or the accusations, suggesting that this didn't exactly say much for her own balance. Steve assumed, incorrectly and nastily, that I was demanding an apology; I set him straight, but Barry only read Steve's post and decided to pile on. However, on the subject of theoretical apologies, what does it say about someone who can notapologize? Or who thinks apologies are never warranted? My theory: that kind of person is incapable of apologizing because their ego is so bloated while at the same time fragile. That wouldn't be you, would it dreamboat? Exactly. Is Barry still barging into your dreams and trying to snuggle up to you, BTW?
RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Line em up for me, Dudy. I've had a glance at Neo'd archives and I need a lot more motivation to wade into that mess! From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:08 PM Subject: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) P.S.: You might want to check my past posts in which I mentioned HuffPo and see whether I used the definite article. Hint: That's when it's used as a noun. I don't want you to embarrass yourself by quoting a phrase like "The HuffPo story..." and claiming victory. In such a case, the definite article is for the noun--"story"--and not for the adjective "HuffPo." ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: You're wrong again, Share. Thinking isn't your best thing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before "HuffPo." You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy wrote & apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! ________ From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, "Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened!" ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! ____________ From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Judy, you've gone totally bonkers. Again! Not only did I not call you a liar, but when turq called you that, I actually replied to him that you changed your mind and I did not consider that lying. I was defending you not trying to *get* you! From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:05 AM Subject: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Ann wrote: Who wants an apology? I think the lady was looking for factual back up of Xeno's assertions about her. No, this was actually about Share having made one of her idiotic bloopers trying to "get" me in a post to Barry, then resisting the facts tooth and nail, making mistake after mistake, to the point of calling me a liar, then claiming I wasn't "balanced." I observed that she hadn't apologized for all the mistakes or the accusations, suggesting that this didn't exactly say much for her own balance. Steve assumed, incorrectly and nastily, that I was demanding an apology; I set him straight, but Barry only read Steve's post and decided to pile on. However, on the subject of theoretical apologies, what does it say about someone who can notapologize? Or who thinks apologies are never warranted? My theory: that kind of person is incapable of apologizing because their ego is so bloated while at the same time fragile. That wouldn't be you, would it dreamboat? Exactly. Is Barry still barging into your dreams and trying to snuggle up to you, BTW?
RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Steve, I kind of liked Ann's flow chart on all this apology business: Dear Richard, if you apologize to MJ then I am sure Judy might consider apologizing to Buck. When Barry apologizes to everybody then Judy might consider apologizing to Share. When Share apologizes to Robin then Judy might consider apologizing to Steve. An apology to Barry, however, might extract a higher price. From: Steve Sundur To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:48 PM Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) You've got to wonder how many people owe Judy an apology on this forum? And how many owe her more than one? Maybe a hundred and a thousand! Judy, are you by chance keeping a tally? From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:32 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Oh, what a stinging rebuke... (Notice no apology from Share for her incredibly dense misunderstanding. Now, that's balance for you.) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: And being balanced in any way isn't your best thing, Judy. From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:19 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) You're wrong again, Share. Thinking isn't your best thing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before "HuffPo." You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy wrote & apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, "Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened!" ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Judy, I don't think I got it wrong. BTW, instinct would be nature and the way one was brought up would be nurture. They are traditionally considered opposites, not the same as your writing indicates here. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:59 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I guess it's just my instinct--the way I was brought up--to apologize if I've gotten something as badly wrong as Share did (and often does). It's not really a matter of "owing" an apology so much as noticing who has that instinct and who doesn't. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: You've got to wonder how many people owe Judy an apology on this forum? And how many owe her more than one? Maybe a hundred and a thousand! Judy, are you by chance keeping a tally? From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:32 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Oh, what a stinging rebuke... (Notice no apology from Share for her incredibly dense misunderstanding. Now, that's balance for you.) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: And being balanced in any way isn't your best thing, Judy. From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:19 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) You're wrong again, Share. Thinking isn't your best thing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before "HuffPo." You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy wrote & apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, "Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened!" ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Two old women -- one in her 60s, the other in her 70s -- walk into a bar. They stride up to the bar and announce, "We're here for the Dick-Size Contest...when does it start?" The bartender says, "Oh, you must be looking for Fairfield Life. It's round the corner. This is a bar." --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! > > > From: "authfriend@..." authfriend@... > > It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. > > Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before "HuffPo." You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. > > She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. > > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: > > Judy wrote & apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? > Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The > errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. > Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! > > > From: "authfriend@" authfriend@ > > I'd say it was, "Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened!" > > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: > > Oh how quickly they forget! > > > From: "authfriend@" authfriend@ > > Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? > > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: > > Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait!
Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Steve Sundur wrote: > > You've got to wonder how many people owe Judy an > apology on this forum? And how many owe her more > than one? Maybe a hundred and a thousand! > > Judy, are you by chance keeping a tally? To go all Advaita on this question's ass, what can want, much less demand, an apology? Only an ego. What can make a career of it? Only an out-of-control ego.
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
oh, okay. but I've noticed that you seem to be the only one who regularly brings this up. maybe it is a matter of upbringing, although I thought mine was pretty traditional with regard to manners and such. (obviously my grammar and writing structure has taken a turn for the worse) From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:59 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I guess it's just my instinct--the way I was brought up--to apologize if I've gotten something as badly wrong as Share did (and often does). It's not really a matter of "owing" an apology so much as noticing who has that instinct and who doesn't. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: You've got to wonder how many people owe Judy an apology on this forum? And how many owe her more than one? Maybe a hundred and a thousand! Judy, are you by chance keeping a tally? From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:32 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Oh, what a stinging rebuke... (Notice no apology from Share for her incredibly dense misunderstanding. Now, that's balance for you.) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: And being balanced in any way isn't your best thing, Judy. From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:19 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) You're wrong again, Share. Thinking isn't your best thing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before "HuffPo." You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy wrote & apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! ________________ From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, "Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened!" ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! ________ From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
You've got to wonder how many people owe Judy an apology on this forum? And how many owe her more than one? Maybe a hundred and a thousand! Judy, are you by chance keeping a tally? From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:32 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Oh, what a stinging rebuke... (Notice no apology from Share for her incredibly dense misunderstanding. Now, that's balance for you.) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: And being balanced in any way isn't your best thing, Judy. From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:19 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) You're wrong again, Share. Thinking isn't your best thing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before "HuffPo." You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy wrote & apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, "Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened!" ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! ____________ From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snipI posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
And being balanced in any way isn't your best thing, Judy. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:19 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) You're wrong again, Share. Thinking isn't your best thing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before "HuffPo." You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy wrote & apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, "Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened!" ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! ____ From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before "HuffPo." You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy wrote & apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, "Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened!" ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Judy wrote & apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, "Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened!" ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Oh how quickly they forget! From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which "FFL editor" would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
On 9/24/2013 5:17 AM, Jason wrote: > Judy, it's precisely this kind of statements you make that I > and WillyTex were refering to... > Well, I'm glad to see that someone is on the Judy-Barry case! And, I can tell you that we're dealing with some of the strangest behavior patterns on the internet. Sometimes I think I'm on 4Chan instead of on Yahoo FFL. Go figure. The history of these two, Judy and Barry, are legend by now - famous for fifteen minutes on the internet. Barry wrote: "Willy, since fucking prairie dogs or whatever you do with your time doesn't seem to fill enough of it lately..." Clever! But, just for the record, Judy called me a 'liar' in a post on Usenet concerning Bush's overall approval rating in a Gallup poll that I cited. She either would not or could not admit that my citation was accurate, even to the point of ignoring a screen-shot of the data that I posted to my Website. When I demanded an apology, she called me "a slime ball" or something to that effect. In one post she referred to me as a 'molusk'. Apparently Judy isn't not one of my biggest fans. LoL! Other than that, you could count on one hand the number of conversations I've had with Ms Stein or Mr. Wright. For about four years, from 1999-2003, Judy studiously avoided addressing me, as if I was a non-person or something. I've probably posted about 10,000 messages to Usenet, the vast majority of them on topic. Its only during an election that I've posted many OT political observations or news citations. At some point, I realized that Judy has a very serious problem with conservative political ideology, which far outweighs any collaboration with others to defend Mr. Varma. Go figure. That said, she's most often spot-on in her comments on TM and TM practice, the subject of this forum. So, I like to give credit where credit is due. As for Barry, he still hasn't explained the Rama levitation event. Hey! How many posts do you have to submit to this list anyway, before you're not considered a troll? Go figure. On 9/24/2013 5:17 AM, Jason wrote: Judy, it's precisely this kind of statements you make that I and WillyTex were refering to. To put it bluntly, you are abrasive. If you had diplomacy, if you let the conversations flow in a natural and fluid way, you would be certainly a brilliant poster. As Xeno pointed out, you as much as Barry, shift contexts in arguments. Barry is an emotional psychopath, and an emotional sadist. You, on the other hand is an intellectual psychopath. Ravi told a plain lie to Curtis that he bought drink to a minor. You tried to justifiy it by saying, Curtis was "projecting". _http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300480 _ _http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300544_ > --- "authfriend" wrote: > > Good lord, (E)hare, don't humiliate yourself by invoking > Mr. Spock's logic. You wouldn't recognize logic if it > stuck its fingers up your nose. > > > --- sharelong60 wrote: > > > > (D)udy, you told ME not to waste YOUR time! Duh! How can > > I possibly waste YOUR time?! As Spock would say: your > > logic is weak. > > > > > From: "authfriend@..." > > > > > > Share tried a blather instead of a blither: > > > > > > I have no control over which posts of mine you read, > > > Judy, ergo I have no control over how you spend your > > > time on FFL. > > > > > > I don't believe I said you did, Share. > > > > > > What you do have control over is whether you ask > > > stupid questions. > > > > > > Oh, wait... > > >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say "shifting context?" Can you say "Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons?" I think you can.
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Steve bleated: Oh, that was a classic. Wait, do you hear something? Kind of like someone running ready to barge in here. Yup. I wasn't trying to justify Ravi's lie in either of the posts Jason linked to. I never tried to justify it and in fact condemned it in other posts. Good. Glad to hear that Judy. That would have been a tough one to spin. Guess my recollection was a little off. Seems both Jason and Steve are a little confused about what actually went on during that episode. Ravi told a plain lie to Curtis that he bought drink to a minor. You tried to justifiy it by saying, Curtis was "projecting". http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300480 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300544
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Oh, that was a classic. Wait, do you hear something? Kind of like someone running ready to barge in here. Ravi told a plain lie to Curtis that he bought drink to a minor. You tried to justifiy it by saying, Curtis was "projecting". http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300480 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/300544 > --- "authfriend" wrote: > > Good lord, (E)hare, don't humiliate yourself by invoking > Mr. Spock's logic. You wouldn't recognize logic if it > stuck its fingers up your nose. > > > --- sharelong60 wrote: > > > > (D)udy, you told ME not to waste YOUR time! Duh! How can > > I possibly waste YOUR time?! As Spock would say: your > > logic is weak. > > > > > From: "authfriend@..." > > > > > > Share tried a blather instead of a blither: > > > > > > I have no control over which posts of mine you read, > > > Judy, ergo I have no control over how you spend your > > > time on FFL. > > > > > > I don't believe I said you did, Share. > > > > > > What you do have control over is whether you ask > > > stupid questions. > > > > > > Oh, wait... > > >
