ed did not have your post!
On Wed, 10/9/13, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
>Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The power nap: an alternative
>to TM?
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2013, 12:08 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
he list in Full Featured did not have your post!
On Wed, 10/9/13, doctordumbass@... mailto:doctordumbass@... mailto:doctordumbass@...> wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The power nap: an alternative
to TM?
To: FairfieldLife@ya
..@rocketmail.com
wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The power nap: an alternative
to TM?
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2013, 12:08 PM
Hey Share,
if a person is established in silence all the
doctordumb...@rocketmail.com
wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The power nap: an alternative
to TM?
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2013, 12:08 PM
Hey Share,
if a
Hey Share, if a person is established in silence all the time, they no longer
need to round seven and a half hours a day. It continues 24/7. So, there is not
really a correlation between time explicitly spent meditating, and a person's
ability to be a source of calm, vs a generator of noise.
Oh, please, Share, your desperation is palpable. You just keep digging yourself
in deeper. Most spouses who both work outside the home do not work in the same
place. There are some who do, but, you know, that's why I said it was *verging
on* a tautology, to leave room for those few.
And in a
Judy, outside the home does not almost create a tautology because, as in my
family, spouses work outside the home, but in the same place thus are not
separated in the way that was being discussed. As for attempting to accurately
read my mind regarding my use of I think, you failed IMO. As for my
Share wrote:
> Judy, unlike you who simply asserts
> your opinions as facts, I say I think to designate that in
> this day and age of many working at home, my statement is
> qualified in that I don't know all the statistics involved.
Nope, sorry, you specified spouses who work *outside the home*
Ann, there were 2 posts and in one you focused on rounding spouses. As a
response to the other, I refer you to this comment from Seraphita:We understand
what you're saying but it is a common belief in all
contemplative traditions that communities joined together practising
silent prayer (eg, mo
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Now this comment from Judy is a perfect example of snarky IMO. Ann had
criticized that people rounding for 7 1/2 hours were thus separated from their
spouses. I responded reasonably noting that spouses who work away from home are
also separated
o.com wrote:
Subject: RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The power nap: an alternative to
TM?
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2013, 9:34 AM
It was the "I
think" that cracked m
Share, thanks for the answer. It also proves that you can read thoughts,
because I was just about to ask Ann if this was an example of snarkiness.
Btw., for all Neo-fans, I think I discovered another feature, I haven't seen
any of you talking about yet. But if I click on those three little d
It was the "I think" that cracked me up, as if you might not be quite sure
about such a trivial and obvious fact. False humility on your part, in other
words. You do it a lot; it's a function of the general inauthenticity of your
FFL persona.
Share wrote:
Now this comment from Judy is a perfect
13 matches
Mail list logo
