[FairfieldLife] Re: Innocence through recognition of one's own faults:

2008-07-06 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Waking Down group addresses this point too. They use the > term "Wakedown Shakedown" to refer to the heightened awareness > and accelerated resolution of personal faults that ensues after > awakening. Maybe Alex

[FairfieldLife] Re: Innocence through recognition of one's own faults:

2008-07-06 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Behalf Of TurquoiseB > > > > What this person is describing is the *opposite* > > of "innocence." She/he/it is describing *replacing* > > one view of the universe with another, that's all. > > Good observation

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Innocence through recognition of one's own faults:

2008-07-06 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TurquoiseB Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 1:24 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Innocence through recognition of one's own faults: >What this person is describing is the *oppos

[FairfieldLife] Re: Innocence through recognition of one's own faults:

2008-07-05 Thread TurquoiseB
What this person is describing is the *opposite* of "innocence." She/he/it is describing *replacing* one view of the universe with another, that's all. There are *assumptions* underlying everything that she/he/it says: 1. That "ignorance of the Self" is the causal or primary "mistake." 2. That t

[FairfieldLife] Re: Innocence

2006-09-05 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote: > > > You may have misunderstood me here. I also, like many here think this > > is a great post of

[FairfieldLife] Re: Innocence

2006-09-05 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote: > > > > > I also got it that way. There is certainly an advanced technique were > > > you have to have your attention at a certain area. If it's the exact > > > lo

[FairfieldLife] Re: Innocence

2006-09-05 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote: > > > > While I like Trinity and his posts, -- and we appear to have similar > > views and experience on some key things (like the non-ownership of > > action, the

[FairfieldLife] Re: Innocence

2006-09-05 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I also got it that way. There is certainly an advanced technique were > > you have to have your attention at a certain area. If it's the exact > > location of the (heart)-chakra is another question. I was pointed to

[FairfieldLife] Re: Innocence

2006-09-05 Thread Robert Gimbel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Great Post, Thanks... R.G. > > > > It was thinking the mantra in a certain area of the > > > body. It is one of the last advanced techniques. I can > > > see why the term "chakra" was not used because chakra > > >