[FairfieldLife] RE: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-04 Thread jr_esq













[FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-04 Thread Richard J. Williams


Share Long:
> ...are you saying that Dr. Pete is needed because I 
> enjoy your posts?!
> 
We need Dr. Pete because he is a psychologist and maybe
he could help answer Alex's question about why Turq 
still posts to FFL, when it's obvious that Turq doesn't 
like us very much. Some people just feel better when 
they have someone to talk to, I guess, but does it 
bother anyone else that the mime is talking? 

Go figure.

> > > Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?
> > >





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-04 Thread Share Long
Richard, are you saying that Dr. Pete is needed because I enjoy your posts?! Do 
I even need to say it?! Ok, go figure!





 From: Richard J. Williams 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 10:35 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  


Share Long:
> Richard, I gotta tell you that you're one of the 
> posters who I almost always thoroughly enjoy both 
> for the form and content of your posts. You make 
> me laugh and also I take to heart what you say 
> about current events and political issues. 
>
Yeah, I mean if you had a levitation event with 
someone, wouldn't that be pretty earth-shaking event?

Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?

For some reason Turq left out Lawson, I wonder if he
reads Lawson's posts - probably not. Lawson is really
up on the medical and scientific aspect of TM practice.

Speaking of email, one guy I know who lives up in 
Deadwood, SD, doesn't have email, or at least he 
doesn't read it. Go figure.

He's probably like a lot of guys that work out in the 
field - they have at least three free email accounts 
but they don't even remember the passwords to one of 
them. LoL! 

But, if you want a slot-machine repaired, he's the guy 
to go to. He does have a flip-phone though and a 
land line. He used to live up in Reno, and had a large 
business of his own there servicing thousands of gaming 
machines, until he got divorced. So, now he works out of
a warehouse off Main Street in Deadwood.

Go figure. 

> > According to what I've read, Turq is not interested in a 
> > dialog about TM, about meditating in a group, living in 
> > Fairfield, or what is going on in New Jersey or Austin. 
> >
> > All he seems to want to talk about is his apartment in 
> > Paris or a cafe in Amsterdam. Turq doesn't even want to 
> > talk about his crazy Tibetan religion, perhaps because 
> > he knows no Tibetan. 
> >
> > But, you'd think Turq would want to talk about his own
> > levitation event with Rama. LoL!
> >
> > I'm beginning to think what we're dealing with here is a 
> > guy posting from his place of employ. If so, that's very
> >understandable - work related distractions.
> >
> > Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?
>


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-04 Thread Share Long
Richard, are you saying that Dr. Pete is needed because I enjoy your posts?! Do 
I even need to say it?! Ok, go figure!





 From: Richard J. Williams 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 10:35 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  


Share Long:
> Richard, I gotta tell you that you're one of the 
> posters who I almost always thoroughly enjoy both 
> for the form and content of your posts. You make 
> me laugh and also I take to heart what you say 
> about current events and political issues. 
>
Yeah, I mean if you had a levitation event with 
someone, wouldn't that be pretty earth-shaking event?

Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?

For some reason Turq left out Lawson, I wonder if he
reads Lawson's posts - probably not. Lawson is really
up on the medical and scientific aspect of TM practice.

Speaking of email, one guy I know who lives up in 
Deadwood, SD, doesn't have email, or at least he 
doesn't read it. Go figure.

He's probably like a lot of guys that work out in the 
field - they have at least three free email accounts 
but they don't even remember the passwords to one of 
them. LoL! 

But, if you want a slot-machine repaired, he's the guy 
to go to. He does have a flip-phone though and a 
land line. He used to live up in Reno, and had a large 
business of his own there servicing thousands of gaming 
machines, until he got divorced. So, now he works out of
a warehouse off Main Street in Deadwood.

Go figure. 

> > According to what I've read, Turq is not interested in a 
> > dialog about TM, about meditating in a group, living in 
> > Fairfield, or what is going on in New Jersey or Austin. 
> >
> > All he seems to want to talk about is his apartment in 
> > Paris or a cafe in Amsterdam. Turq doesn't even want to 
> > talk about his crazy Tibetan religion, perhaps because 
> > he knows no Tibetan. 
> >
> > But, you'd think Turq would want to talk about his own
> > levitation event with Rama. LoL!
> >
> > I'm beginning to think what we're dealing with here is a 
> > guy posting from his place of employ. If so, that's very
> >understandable - work related distractions.
> >
> > Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?
>


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-04 Thread Share Long
Richard, are you saying that Dr. Pete is needed because I enjoy your posts?! Do 
I even need to say it?! Ok, go figure!





 From: Richard J. Williams 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 10:35 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  


Share Long:
> Richard, I gotta tell you that you're one of the 
> posters who I almost always thoroughly enjoy both 
> for the form and content of your posts. You make 
> me laugh and also I take to heart what you say 
> about current events and political issues. 
>
Yeah, I mean if you had a levitation event with 
someone, wouldn't that be pretty earth-shaking event?

Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?

For some reason Turq left out Lawson, I wonder if he
reads Lawson's posts - probably not. Lawson is really
up on the medical and scientific aspect of TM practice.

Speaking of email, one guy I know who lives up in 
Deadwood, SD, doesn't have email, or at least he 
doesn't read it. Go figure.

He's probably like a lot of guys that work out in the 
field - they have at least three free email accounts 
but they don't even remember the passwords to one of 
them. LoL! 

But, if you want a slot-machine repaired, he's the guy 
to go to. He does have a flip-phone though and a 
land line. He used to live up in Reno, and had a large 
business of his own there servicing thousands of gaming 
machines, until he got divorced. So, now he works out of
a warehouse off Main Street in Deadwood.

Go figure. 

> > According to what I've read, Turq is not interested in a 
> > dialog about TM, about meditating in a group, living in 
> > Fairfield, or what is going on in New Jersey or Austin. 
> >
> > All he seems to want to talk about is his apartment in 
> > Paris or a cafe in Amsterdam. Turq doesn't even want to 
> > talk about his crazy Tibetan religion, perhaps because 
> > he knows no Tibetan. 
> >
> > But, you'd think Turq would want to talk about his own
> > levitation event with Rama. LoL!
> >
> > I'm beginning to think what we're dealing with here is a 
> > guy posting from his place of employ. If so, that's very
> >understandable - work related distractions.
> >
> > Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?
>


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-04 Thread Richard J. Williams


Share Long:
> Richard, I gotta tell you that you're one of the 
> posters who I almost always thoroughly enjoy both 
> for the form and content of your posts. You make 
> me laugh and also I take to heart what you say 
> about current events and political issues. 
>
Yeah, I mean if you had a levitation event with 
someone, wouldn't that be pretty earth-shaking event?

Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?

For some reason Turq left out Lawson, I wonder if he
reads Lawson's posts - probably not. Lawson is really
up on the medical and scientific aspect of TM practice.
 
Speaking of email, one guy I know who lives up in 
Deadwood, SD, doesn't have email, or at least he 
doesn't read it. Go figure.

He's probably like a lot of guys that work out in the 
field - they have at least three free email accounts 
but they don't even remember the passwords to one of 
them. LoL! 

But, if you want a slot-machine repaired, he's the guy  
to go to. He does have a flip-phone though and a 
land line. He used to live up in Reno, and had a large 
business of his own there servicing thousands of gaming 
machines, until he got divorced. So, now he works out of
a warehouse off Main Street in Deadwood.

Go figure. 

> > According to what I've read, Turq is not interested in a 
> > dialog about TM, about meditating in a group, living in 
> > Fairfield, or what is going on in New Jersey or Austin. 
> >
> > All he seems to want to talk about is his apartment in 
> > Paris or a cafe in Amsterdam. Turq doesn't even want to 
> > talk about his crazy Tibetan religion, perhaps because 
> > he knows no Tibetan. 
> >
> > But, you'd think Turq would want to talk about his own
> > levitation event with Rama. LoL!
> >
> > I'm beginning to think what we're dealing with here is a 
> > guy posting from his place of employ. If so, that's very
> >understandable - work related distractions.
> >
> > Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?
>




[FairfieldLife] RE: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread bobpriced













Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Share Long
emptybill, what I would say to those Tralfamadorians is that their four 
dimensional living is a speck in the ocean of Love and as such, aloneness, 
especially at the moment of death, is simply Everythingness.





 From: emptybill 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 8:50 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  
Back in '95 when my wife died, she was surrounded by her
extended family as her labored breathing began to end.
I placed one hand on her heart and the other on her ajña chakra.
At that point I did what I could to draw up her pranas using my prana.
However, in the end I concluded that we still die suddenly and
alone because consciousness exits and is gone, and although
accessible, it isn't present in the same way.

As the Tralfamadorians say ... so it goes.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> emptybill, you're another poster whose posts I enjoy on so many
levels. But usually I don't reply because I'm not so articulate in those
more abstract realms. But I do enjoy reading those like you who are
articulate about them. PS I bet your daughters will be with you when you
die (-:
>
>
>
>
> 
>  From: emptybill emptybill@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 7:42 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
>
>
>
> Â
> As has been pointed out numberless times but rarely admitted ...
>
> Everyone dies suddenly and alone.
>


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread emptybill
Back in '95 when my wife died, she was surrounded by her
extended family as her labored breathing began to end.
I placed one hand on her heart and the other on her ajña chakra.
At that point I did what I could to draw up her pranas using my prana.
However, in the end I concluded that we still die suddenly and
alone because consciousness exits and is gone, and although
accessible, it isn't present in the same way.

As the Tralfamadorians say ... so it goes.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> emptybill, you're another poster whose posts I enjoy on so many
levels. But usually I don't reply because I'm not so articulate in those
more abstract realms. But I do enjoy reading those like you who are
articulate about them. PS I bet your daughters will be with you when you
die (-:
>
>
>
>
> 
>  From: emptybill emptybill@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 7:42 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
>
>
>
> Â
> As has been pointed out numberless times but rarely admitted ...
>
> Everyone dies suddenly and alone.
>




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Share Long
emptybill, you're another poster whose posts I enjoy on so many levels. But 
usually I don't reply because I'm not so articulate in those more abstract 
realms. But I do enjoy reading those like you who are articulate about them. PS 
I bet your daughters will be with you when you die (-:





 From: emptybill 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 7:42 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  
As has been pointed out numberless times but rarely admitted ...

Everyone dies suddenly and alone.


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Share Long
Richard, I gotta tell you that you're one of the posters who I almost always 
thoroughly enjoy both for the form and content of your posts. You make me laugh 
and also I take to heart what you say about current events and political 
issues. 





 From: Richard J. Williams 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 10:33 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  


Alex:
> ...why the hell do you stick around, making it even worse 
> with your whining and lashing out?
>
Turq left out Lawson, one of the most interesting posters 
on the internet. It's not surprising that Turq would be in 
favor of reading posts from his own minions, Pips and MGs. 

According to what I've read, Turq is not interested in a 
dialog about TM, about meditating in a group, living in 
Fairfield, or what is going on in New Jersey or Austin. 

All he seems to want to talk about is his apartment in 
Paris or a cafe in Amsterdam. Turq doesn't even want to 
talk about his crazy Tibetan religion, perhaps because he 
knows no Tibetan. 

But, you'd think Turq would want to talk about his own
levitation event with Rama. LoL!

I'm beginning to think what we're dealing with here is a 
guy posting from his place of employ. If so, that's very
understandable - work related distractions.

Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Richard J. Williams


Alex:
> ...why the hell do you stick around, making it even worse 
> with your whining and lashing out?
>
Turq left out Lawson, one of the most interesting posters 
on the internet. It's not surprising that Turq would be in 
favor of reading posts from his own minions, Pips and MGs. 

According to what I've read, Turq is not interested in a 
dialog about TM, about meditating in a group, living in 
Fairfield, or what is going on in New Jersey or Austin. 

All he seems to want to talk about is his apartment in 
Paris or a cafe in Amsterdam. Turq doesn't even want to 
talk about his crazy Tibetan religion, perhaps because he 
knows no Tibetan. 

But, you'd think Turq would want to talk about his own
levitation event with Rama. LoL!

I'm beginning to think what we're dealing with here is a 
guy posting from his place of employ. If so, that's very
understandable - work related distractions.

Where is Dr. Pete when we really need him?




RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread authfriend













Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Share Long
But Judy, that's exactly what I've had to do ever since I started looking for 
old posts over a year ago! It's not a new process for me.  And since we're 
talking only about the previous 3 weeks, that makes it easier. Plus usually I 
remember the poster, and sometimes even a phrase. 





 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 9:54 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  
For the record, even if one were inclined to compile a list of posts that would 
satisfy Barry's demand, one couldn't do it by looking through the Message View 
lists. One would have to remember the specifics of the post--approximate date, 
poster's name, and a word or phrase from the post--to search for it 
individually. (And that's if Search were working, which it does only 
sporadically.) Otherwise it would take many hours to turn up suitable posts.

I strongly suspect Barry was well aware that he was asking the impossible and 
did so deliberately so he could crow and sneer about nobody being able to 
fulfill it.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


turq, I don't think you're being very tantric about how FFL is changing. 
Sometimes life is not the way we want it to be. So what? Also, there have been 
way too many good posts during the past 3 weeks to list them here. I do hope 
you continue to post here but if not, then I wish you all the best. Finally, 
what's the point of focusing on something over which one has no control?!




 From: turquoiseb 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 7:50 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Steve Sundur  wrote:

>
>> > Ahem. "Egoic aversion" is *your* take on what I said,
>> > not what I said. I asked for reasons why I or anyone
>> > else would *want* to stick around, asking in particular 
>> > for EXAMPLES to support that stance. 
>>  
>> So many of your posts are about what a "low vibe" place 
>> this is. So at some point the more obvious question is, 
>> why you continue to post?
>> In the past you've said you stick around because of the 
>> occasional worthwhile banter from those you still find 
>> interesting. So why not just join in when you find 
>> something of interest, and lose all the whining? And 
>> for the record, I think Curtis would agree with this 
>> assessment.
>
>For the record, that IS my approach, and has been
the last three weeks. What I guess I'm complaining 
about is that more often than not these days I make 
a full scan of posts on FFL in Message View and find
nothing worth replying to. 

Since that is unlikely to change, you may be correct 
that it's "whining" to comment on it. I just thought 
I'd give people a chance to point to concrete EXAMPLES 
of what *they* consider good posts. So far, only one 
person has done so, and even that was mixed with ad 
hominem.







 

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread authfriend













Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Share Long
turq, I don't think you're being very tantric about how FFL is changing. 
Sometimes life is not the way we want it to be. So what? Also, there have been 
way too many good posts during the past 3 weeks to list them here. I do hope 
you continue to post here but if not, then I wish you all the best. Finally, 
what's the point of focusing on something over which one has no control?!




 From: turquoiseb 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 7:50 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Steve Sundur  wrote:
>
> > Ahem. "Egoic aversion" is *your* take on what I said,
> > not what I said. I asked for reasons why I or anyone
> > else would *want* to stick around, asking in particular 
> > for EXAMPLES to support that stance. 
>  
> So many of your posts are about what a "low vibe" place 
> this is. So at some point the more obvious question is, 
> why you continue to post?
> In the past you've said you stick around because of the 
> occasional worthwhile banter from those you still find 
> interesting. So why not just join in when you find 
> something of interest, and lose all the whining? And 
> for the record, I think Curtis would agree with this 
> assessment.

For the record, that IS my approach, and has been
the last three weeks. What I guess I'm complaining 
about is that more often than not these days I make 
a full scan of posts on FFL in Message View and find
nothing worth replying to. 

Since that is unlikely to change, you may be correct 
that it's "whining" to comment on it. I just thought 
I'd give people a chance to point to concrete EXAMPLES 
of what *they* consider good posts. So far, only one 
person has done so, and even that was mixed with ad 
hominem.





 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Share Long
Thanks, Steve and it's always wonderful to see how the addition of just one 
more balanced poster can make FFL feel well, more balanced and beneficial. I 
hope you'll be able and willing to return here even more frequently.





 From: Steve Sundur 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  
Yes, I noticed that you did seem to be following the routine you describe 
below.  Which is the same routine I think most follow here.  

And I guess I don't typically find too much to comment on either and tend to be 
a low volume poster unless I am engaged in a one on one with someone.

What keeps me coming back? Really just a means to relax and hear different 
points of view about things.

Among my favorites are Edg, Curtis, (when he participates), You, Share, Emily, 
BP, Ann, Alex, Obba.  But also Judy, Doc, Xeno, Bhairitu, Irantea, MJ, and 
everyone else for that matter.



 From: turquoiseb 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 7:50 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Steve Sundur  wrote:
>
> > Ahem. "Egoic aversion" is *your* take on what I said,
> > not what I said. I asked for reasons why I or anyone
> > else would *want* to stick around, asking in particular 
> > for EXAMPLES to support that stance. 
>  
> So many of your posts are about what a "low vibe" place 
> this is. So at some point the more obvious question is, 
> why you continue to post?
> In the past you've said you stick around because of the 
> occasional worthwhile banter from those you still find 
> interesting. So why not just join in when you find 
> something of interest, and lose all the whining? And 
> for the record, I think Curtis would agree with this 
> assessment.

For the record, that IS my approach, and has been
the last three weeks. What I guess I'm complaining 
about is that more often than not these days I make 
a full scan of posts on FFL in Message View and find
nothing worth replying to. 

Since that is unlikely to change, you may be correct 
that it's "whining" to comment on it. I just thought 
I'd give people a chance to point to concrete EXAMPLES 
of what *they* consider good posts. So far, only one 
person has done so, and even that was mixed with ad 
hominem.

I agree that Susan's post was good, and that most
of hers are. I also feel that many of Salyavin's
posts are worth reading and (if I'm interested in
the content, which is not always) worth replying
to. Same with some of emptybill's and merudanda's
posts, and some of Xeno's and compost1uk's. I like
many of bhairitu's posts, possibly because I'm 
interested in the content. I appreciate some 
of mjackson's and iranitea's posts, but not all.
And of course azgrey's and Curtis', on the rare
occasions when they do a drive-by. Some posters
I am ambivalent about because I'm rarely inter-
ested in the things they're interested in (like
Card and Buck). 

With most of the others, I've found that not 
bothering to read anything but the first few words
of their posts in Message View doesn't seem to have 
impacted my life negatively. To the contrary, it 
feels (as Alex said) "lighter," as if I'd stopped 
bothering to listen to what bag ladies I pass on 
the street are screaming about. :-) 

If any of those people feel offended by being put 
in the "We're not worthy" group, they are free to
post a few EXAMPLES of why they don't belong there.
If they don't, or can't, I don't see any reason to
assign them to any other group, or to treat what
they have to say here any differently. YMMV.




 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Ann Woelfle Bater



[FairfieldLife] RE: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Ann Woelfle Bater
Judy, this response held everything and more of what Barry was asking and was 
not asking in his post this morning. I especially appreciated your explanation 
and description of why and how viewpoints can be spiritual here although they 
may not be talking about anything other than war or movies or commenting on the 
post of another. There is no limit to how intelligence can be expressed and we 
have a wonderful collage of personalities who are able to see and, in turn, 
portray the individuality and depth of their experience of the world to the 
rest of us.

It is, of course, predictable that Barry cites the posters who mostly agree 
with him as those he finds worthy to read. This is an old story and more a sign 
of him as a person than a valid certification of the worthwhileness of these 
peoples' posts (not to say that the "worthwhile" posts by those he deems 
readable aren't, indeed readable).

And we have all lamented the fact that Salyavin has left for the moment, no one 
here has blasted him for it. I certainly appealed for him to come back. So, as 
usual, Barry is making this up to create more dissension and ill will. Why 
would he do that? (Rhetorical question.) 

This week in particular has been a great example of people actually 
spontaneously interacting more like they might do in real life in a room where 
conversation follows a flow with one viewpoint or interjection after another. 
It has a more natural and friendly flow to it than when there were posting 
limits. I think Barry wants to pontificate and he likes this sort of gag order 
emerging once certain people hit a particular post count. He waits and plans 
for this. He loves the soapbox and would prefer it if no one else could speak 
unless it was to support and stroke him. Otherwise, the rest of us should shut 
up because he has far more important things to say and we better listen while 
he misleads and abuses and makes it very, very clear (in his mind) why we are 
all lacking in one way or another as humans and as creative people.

Barry might take small breaks but he'll never leave, not for the immediate 
future. For as much as he dislikes most of the people here and claims 
superficiality on our parts he needs a dogs body to kick and yank around. He 
also needs to leap onto his battered old soapbox often enough to make himself 
feel important.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Steve Sundur
Yes, I noticed that you did seem to be following the routine you describe 
below.  Which is the same routine I think most follow here.  

And I guess I don't typically find too much to comment on either and tend to be 
a low volume poster unless I am engaged in a one on one with someone.

What keeps me coming back? Really just a means to relax and hear different 
points of view about things.

Among my favorites are Edg, Curtis, (when he participates), You, Share, Emily, 
BP, Ann, Alex, Obba.  But also Judy, Doc, Xeno, Bhairitu, Irantea, MJ, and 
everyone else for that matter.



 From: turquoiseb 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 7:50 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Steve Sundur  wrote:
>
> > Ahem. "Egoic aversion" is *your* take on what I said,
> > not what I said. I asked for reasons why I or anyone
> > else would *want* to stick around, asking in particular 
> > for EXAMPLES to support that stance. 
>  
> So many of your posts are about what a "low vibe" place 
> this is. So at some point the more obvious question is, 
> why you continue to post?
> In the past you've said you stick around because of the 
> occasional worthwhile banter from those you still find 
> interesting. So why not just join in when you find 
> something of interest, and lose all the whining? And 
> for the record, I think Curtis would agree with this 
> assessment.

For the record, that IS my approach, and has been
the last three weeks. What I guess I'm complaining 
about is that more often than not these days I make 
a full scan of posts on FFL in Message View and find
nothing worth replying to. 

Since that is unlikely to change, you may be correct 
that it's "whining" to comment on it. I just thought 
I'd give people a chance to point to concrete EXAMPLES 
of what *they* consider good posts. So far, only one 
person has done so, and even that was mixed with ad 
hominem.

I agree that Susan's post was good, and that most
of hers are. I also feel that many of Salyavin's
posts are worth reading and (if I'm interested in
the content, which is not always) worth replying
to. Same with some of emptybill's and merudanda's
posts, and some of Xeno's and compost1uk's. I like
many of bhairitu's posts, possibly because I'm 
interested in the content. I appreciate some 
of mjackson's and iranitea's posts, but not all.
And of course azgrey's and Curtis', on the rare
occasions when they do a drive-by. Some posters
I am ambivalent about because I'm rarely inter-
ested in the things they're interested in (like
Card and Buck). 

With most of the others, I've found that not 
bothering to read anything but the first few words
of their posts in Message View doesn't seem to have 
impacted my life negatively. To the contrary, it 
feels (as Alex said) "lighter," as if I'd stopped 
bothering to listen to what bag ladies I pass on 
the street are screaming about. :-) 

If any of those people feel offended by being put 
in the "We're not worthy" group, they are free to
post a few EXAMPLES of why they don't belong there.
If they don't, or can't, I don't see any reason to
assign them to any other group, or to treat what
they have to say here any differently. YMMV.


 

[FairfieldLife] RE: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread authfriend













[FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Steve Sundur  wrote:
>
> > Ahem. "Egoic aversion" is *your* take on what I said,
> > not what I said. I asked for reasons why I or anyone
> > else would *want* to stick around, asking in particular 
> > for EXAMPLES to support that stance. 
>  
> So many of your posts are about what a "low vibe" place 
> this is. So at some point the more obvious question is, 
> why you continue to post?
> In the past you've said you stick around because of the 
> occasional worthwhile banter from those you still find 
> interesting. So why not just join in when you find 
> something of interest, and lose all the whining? And 
> for the record, I think Curtis would agree with this 
> assessment.

For the record, that IS my approach, and has been
the last three weeks. What I guess I'm complaining 
about is that more often than not these days I make 
a full scan of posts on FFL in Message View and find
nothing worth replying to. 

Since that is unlikely to change, you may be correct 
that it's "whining" to comment on it. I just thought 
I'd give people a chance to point to concrete EXAMPLES 
of what *they* consider good posts. So far, only one 
person has done so, and even that was mixed with ad 
hominem.

I agree that Susan's post was good, and that most
of hers are. I also feel that many of Salyavin's
posts are worth reading and (if I'm interested in
the content, which is not always) worth replying
to. Same with some of emptybill's and merudanda's
posts, and some of Xeno's and compost1uk's. I like
many of bhairitu's posts, possibly because I'm 
interested in the content. I appreciate some 
of mjackson's and iranitea's posts, but not all.
And of course azgrey's and Curtis', on the rare
occasions when they do a drive-by. Some posters
I am ambivalent about because I'm rarely inter-
ested in the things they're interested in (like
Card and Buck). 

With most of the others, I've found that not 
bothering to read anything but the first few words
of their posts in Message View doesn't seem to have 
impacted my life negatively. To the contrary, it 
feels (as Alex said) "lighter," as if I'd stopped 
bothering to listen to what bag ladies I pass on 
the street are screaming about. :-) 

If any of those people feel offended by being put 
in the "We're not worthy" group, they are free to
post a few EXAMPLES of why they don't belong there.
If they don't, or can't, I don't see any reason to
assign them to any other group, or to treat what
they have to say here any differently. YMMV.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread emptybill
As has been pointed out numberless times but rarely admitted ...

Everyone dies suddenly and alone.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread Steve Sundur
Ahem. "Egoic aversion" is *your* take on what I said,
not what I said. I asked for reasons why I or anyone
else would *want* to stick around, asking in particular 
for *examples* to support that stance. 
 
So many of your posts are about what a "low vibe" place this is.  So at some 
point the more obvious question is, why you continue to post?
In he past you've said you stick around because of the occasional worthwhile 
banter from those you still find interesting.  So why not just join in when you 
find something of interest, and lose all the whining?  And for the record, I 
think Curtis would agree with this assessment.  
 
Obviously, you 
weren't able to provide any. Instead you provided a
few ad hominems yourself. 

I'm suggesting that the *standards* here at FFL have
sunk so low that people have *forgotten* what an 
internet discussion group can be, when it hasn't
been reduced to an ongoing soap opera set in junior
high school. 

I'm also still waiting for the *examples* of posts
from the last three weeks that you or other people 
feel *are* up to their high standards. Was yours 
one of them?


 
 

[FairfieldLife] RE: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread doctordumbass













[FairfieldLife] Re: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread turquoiseb
Alex vented:
> 
> From my perspective, the overall mood is much lighter, 
> primarily because your dark passenger hasn't been on 
> here trying to stir up the vitriol. 

Your call. What you call "lighter" I might call 
"inane." But taste is subjective.

> For crying out loud, Barry, if your egoic aversion to 
> FFL is so intense, why the hell do you stick around, 
> making it even worse with your whining and lashing out?

Ahem. "Egoic aversion" is *your* take on what I said,
not what I said. I asked for reasons why I or anyone
else would *want* to stick around, asking in particular 
for *examples* to support that stance. Obviously, you 
weren't able to provide any. Instead you provided a
few ad hominems yourself. 

I'm suggesting that the *standards* here at FFL have
sunk so low that people have *forgotten* what an 
internet discussion group can be, when it hasn't
been reduced to an ongoing soap opera set in junior
high school. 

I'm also still waiting for the *examples* of posts
from the last three weeks that you or other people 
feel *are* up to their high standards. Was yours 
one of them?






[FairfieldLife] RE: Reasons why Neo might be timely

2013-09-03 Thread j_alexander_stanley