---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
Statements are being made here which are not merely opinions but demonstrably
false claims.
http://watchdogwire.com/blog/2014/10/30/libel-slander-facts/
http://watchdogwire.com/blog/2014/10/30/libel-slander-facts/
4. No
I get it that you are trying to shut down free speech you don't like but small
problem:
defamation doesn't apply to dead people.
It is the exception. From your own link: To be defamation it must be.
Be about an identifiable living person or company
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
On 11/2/2014 8:06 PM, curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
I get it that you are trying to shut down free speech you don't like
but small problem:
defamation doesn't apply to dead people.
It is the exception. From your own link: To be defamation it must be.
* Be about an
Re It is against the FFL rules to slander someone.:
Grammar police. Slander is defamation when speaking ill of someone. It's
Libel when the slurs are printed.
It's not slander unless it's untrue. And it won't be proven to be untrue
unless he takes me to court and there's no chance of that, BECAUSE HE KNOWS WUT
HE DONE.
And as for you, you fucking hatred-incarnate war mongering shit-for-brains
cultural wart -- I invite you to sue me too! I can't
Duveyoung:
It's not slander unless it's untrue. And it
won't be proven to be untrue unless he takes
me to court and there's no chance of that,
BECAUSE HE KNOWS WUT HE DONE.
The guilty always scream the loudest, Edg.
And as for you, you fucking hatred-incarnate
war mongering
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@... wrote:
It's not slander unless it's untrue. And it won't be proven to be untrue
unless he takes me to court and there's no chance of that, BECAUSE HE KNOWS
WUT HE DONE.
And as for you, you fucking hatred-incarnate war
