Re: [FairfieldLife] The Waking State Candy Ass Cafe (was Re: Typical Neo-Advaitin jargon)

2006-01-21 Thread Peter
--- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, > "jim_flanegin" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > So, although I think the candy ass thing is a > great job a

[FairfieldLife] The Waking State Candy Ass Cafe (was Re: Typical Neo-Advaitin jargon)

2006-01-21 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > So, although I think the candy ass thing is a great job aid > > personally, almost sutra like in its ability to turn the mind

[FairfieldLife] The Waking State Candy Ass Cafe (was Re: Typical Neo-Advaitin jargon)

2006-01-21 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, although I think the candy ass thing is a great job aid > personally, almost sutra like in its ability to turn the mind away > from the illusion of waking state, everyone begins the journey > by 'understandi

[FairfieldLife] The Waking State Candy Ass Cafe (was Re: Typical Neo-Advaitin jargon)

2006-01-21 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- feste37 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I can't see that "waking state candy ass" is a > > > description of anything, > > > > Sure

[FairfieldLife] The Waking State Candy Ass Cafe (was Re: Typical Neo-Advaitin jargon)

2006-01-21 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- feste37 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I can't see that "waking state candy ass" is a > > > description of anything, > > > > Sur

[FairfieldLife] The Waking State Candy Ass Cafe (was Re: Typical Neo-Advaitin jargon)

2006-01-21 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- feste37 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can't see that "waking state candy ass" is a > > description of anything, > > Sure it is. Look at how Ramana and Nisgardatta and > many other masters treat people that approach

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Waking State Candy Ass Cafe (was Re: Typical Neo-Advaitin jargon)

2006-01-21 Thread Peter
--- feste37 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't see that "waking state candy ass" is a > description of anything, Sure it is. Look at how Ramana and Nisgardatta and many other masters treat people that approach them whinning for a coherent, waking state explanation of Self. They just smash the

[FairfieldLife] The Waking State Candy Ass Cafe (was Re: Typical Neo-Advaitin jargon)

2006-01-21 Thread feste37
I can't see that "waking state candy ass" is a description of anything, let alone a "perfect" description. It's just a vulgarism. "Ass" is a word that Americans seem obsessed by, and I can only wonder why. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I

[FairfieldLife] The Waking State Candy Ass Cafe (was Re: Typical Neo-Advaitin jargon)

2006-01-21 Thread a_non_moose_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- qntmpkt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I haven't seen much "Maharishi-talk" recently on > > > this forum, probably > > > because a

[FairfieldLife] The Waking State Candy Ass Cafe (was Re: Typical Neo-Advaitin jargon)

2006-01-21 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- qntmpkt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I haven't seen much "Maharishi-talk" recently on > > this forum, probably > > because a lot of it so patently absurd that it can > > be dismissed > > outright as jibberish. > > T