For instance, within ‘process’ this memo paste here below was sent as part of a
broader consideration about the leadership a couple of weeks ago, as some
initial vollies of announcements about these times were being edited and sent
around to meditators.
[Paste..
Memo,
We need Strategic
As a major tenet, numbers of meditators meditating in proximity quite evidently
need to quickly be attended to now as part of a collective ‘re-group’ in this
uncertain and transitional period. This needs conscious leadership and this
will take some clarity of vision and mission.
Within the large
As to the loss of cohesion mentioned below, Surveying groups of meditators
downtown, old TM teachers, several pointed out that what they liked about going
to the Dome was ,when everyone went, it was social. Going was being part of
something larger and you saw old friends and old acquaintances f
“These are the times which try human souls.”
There is lots of ‘process’ in fact and organizing going on right now in the
transition. Both Dr. Hagelin and Dr. Nader as Western scientists appreciate
feedback and resonance of input as data to work policy with. The old
never-entertain-negativity
The criticism is understandable given the context. In kind It seems
symptomatic of change and to be expected. Some people are unsettled and upset
by change. That feeling is going on too inside TM with all that is progressing
in the works. The status-quo evidently has changed. The change may be
Let's not forget, folks, that JamesAlan has a history of creating his own
evidence-less narratives out of whole cloth. Pretty funny to see him
criticizing someone else for the same thing.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It is what happened. Was done most discretely at pay grades in this way above
most. Was very bravely done. Lot of committee work and no e-mails to show and
was strategically done in a way to save face for everyone. They all do still
have to wor
So, I wonder to what extent does Bevan Morris have to do with setting the
university curriculum.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
what happened was a minority , but too many, students rebelled. No one
involved wants to embarrass Bevan though and I don't really want to either.
As things worked out I was there in committee meeting most every Monday evening
and more often for two years or so working on this. Based on performance the
corporate decision became clear that the leadership needed to change. Is work
in progress and still in process today moving forward.sr
what happened was a minority , but too many, students rebelled. No one involved
wants to embarrass Bevan though and I don't really want to either.
Ollie, Doug has been saying Bevan was forced out. JamesAlan believes Bevan's
retirement was entirely voluntary.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
from about two months ago...
http://www.thegazette.com/subject/news/education/higher-education/new-president-named-for-mahari
It is what happened. Was done most discretely at pay grades in this way above
most. Was very bravely done. Lot of committee work and no e-mails to show and
was strategically done in a way to save face for everyone. They all do still
have to work with one another in some way at their level. As i
from about two months ago...
http://www.thegazette.com/subject/news/education/higher-education/new-president-named-for-maharishi-university-of-management-20160622
http://www.thegazette.com/subject/news/education/higher-education/new-president-named-for-maharishi-university-of-management-20160622
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
--- snip --- Several have not gone to the group meditation in years. Most
were not even aware that Bevan was changed out...
I've asked you several times to produce evidence that "Bevan was changed out",
and you've never produced any such ev
They may have disgraced themselves with current generations.Maybe the next
generation.
From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Meanwhile in Germany...
Yesterday at a coffee shop downtown in Fairfield I surveyed asking around of
folks sitting at tables [ old meditators who all spent time on courses with
Maharishi) if they had current badges to get in the Domes to meditate?.
Majority said ‘no’. Some so offended by old TM movement administrative
The Lack of cohesion..
They started losing group cohesion when 1] they started in taking people’s Dome
badges away back in the 80’s and throughout the 1990’s and 2] they facilitated
special group program rooms other than in the Domes. At that point people from
across the meditating community w
Yes, there was specialness granted to sub-groups that sent people out.
..established program halls
of which there are 11 (including the Domes)
. The litany of this kind of bifurcation has bled the place. The anemia needs
to stop and meditators should to come together. Numbers in proximity qu
I understand why some people don't live in Fairfield and thus can't get to the
dome to meditate in a group every day.
What I don't understand is why the rajas and other residents of Vedic City
apparently don't meditate in the Patanjali Dome of Pure Knowledge. Where do
they do program and do t
"Yes" what?
You didn't answer my question.
I understand, of course, that group program is said to be more powerful
(including by King Tony, below--"this is the greatest strength").
What I *don't* understand is why people who can't make it to a group program
should not be told, as King
It is sinful that things were allowed to get so bad with the group meditation
numbers. This situation is going to take a lot to recall. Recall (Bugle Call)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxfOuFTRPN4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxfOuFTRPN4
Recall (Bugle Call) https://www.youtube.co
Yes, and by our experience and by the composite of quite a lot of good science
we know that numbers of people meditating and proximity does matter in the
Meissner-like transformational effect of groups meditating.
Someone just sent me a chart from another new study on this.
This ill-advise
And you're being insulting.
I'm not "willfully confusing the situation," I'm asking you to clarify your
remarks. I can't understand for the life of me why you'd object to telling
people who can't make it to a group program that they should schedule their
individual program to fly at the same
No, you are willfully confusing the situation. The guy could stand tall in the
sandals of Maharishi. Maharishi was both one of the great visionaries of the
20th Century and one of its greatest activist revolutionaries into the 21st
Century.
35 years has been spent separating people from the ™
So if somebody really is unable to attend group program, you're saying, they
shouldn't even bother to time their individual program to coincide with the
group program?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Om no. He should be pulling on his oar along with the rest of the team.
Om no. He should be pulling on his oar along with the rest of the team. That
kind of thing just sends things off in circles. This is just giving excuse to
retired meditators out on the periphery who could be contributing to the
community to just stay slack by themselves. It is apologetic for ju
Maybe I'm missing something here. Didn't he say come together *if possible*?
If you can' t, then lift off at the same time.. if possible.
From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 12:58 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife]
27 matches
Mail list logo
