[Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and Go To window couldn't be inputted.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #5 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-17 22:15:58 EDT --- FYI, according to fontforge contributor,

[Bug 461039] liberation-fonts =1.04.2 have problems with some websites

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 --- Comment #8 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-17 22:34:03 EDT --- Hi Pacho, thank you very much for your

[Bug 461039] liberation-fonts =1.04.2 have problems with some websites

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 461039] liberation-fonts =1.04.2 have problems with some websites

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 --- Comment #9 from Pacho Ramos [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-18 05:10:40 EDT --- The problem is that xulrunner-1.8 will be

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #8 from Subhodip Biswas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-18 10:09:27 EDT --- big mistake : i accidently build the

[Bug 458951] [sd-IN] Sindhi language is not identified by fontconfig

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458951 John Poelstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 461039] liberation-fonts =1.04.2 have problems with some websites

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 --- Comment #10 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-18 20:04:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) I have merged

[Bug 458428] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458428 Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 429527] [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429527 --- Comment #7 from A S Alam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-19 01:45:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=317153) --

[Bug 461039] liberation-fonts =1.04.2 have problems with some websites

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 --- Comment #11 from Pacho Ramos [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-19 04:33:00 EDT --- OK, thanks for info :-) I asked for help

[Bug 462531] text of highlighted button in dialog goes black

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462531 John Poelstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 463036] New: Bold u renders badly (blurry) for liberation sans, w too to a smaller extent

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Bold u renders badly (blurry) for liberation sans, w too to a smaller extent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 Summary: Bold u renders badly

[Bug 463036] Bold u renders badly (blurry) for liberation sans, w too to a smaller extent

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 461039] liberation-fonts =1.04.2 have problems with some websites

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 --- Comment #12 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-21 21:47:40 EDT --- Then when you see latest xulrunner

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing not used initially

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #15 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-25 21:07:26 EDT --- In main user's point of view, this is what

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing not used initially

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-25 23:38:04 EDT --- A font package must not override global

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing not used initially

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #18 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-26 04:16:45 EDT --- This is definitely BUG - it affects

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing not used initially

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-26 14:03:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) People who

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing not used initially

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing not used initially

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #21 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-28 23:57:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=317907) --

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing not used initially

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #22 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-28 23:59:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=317908) --

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing not used initially

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing not used initially

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing not used initially

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #23 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-29 00:59:20 EDT --- test patch:

[Bug 464555] New: After installing xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1 font is not available till reboot

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: After installing xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1 font is not available till reboot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464555 Summary: After installing

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 463036] Bold u renders badly (blurry) for liberation sans, w too to a smaller extent

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 463036] Bold u renders badly (blurry) for liberation sans, w too to a smaller extent

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-29 20:48:45 EDT --- Is it using bolded

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #29 from Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-30 04:24:22 EDT --- Uh, Rawhide KDE is supposed to be usable.

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 464555] After installing xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1 font is not available till reboot

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464555 Christian Schuermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 462531] text of highlighted button in dialog goes black

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462531 Jeremy Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #33 from Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-01 03:19:56 EDT --- Might this be the relevant difference? -

[Bug 464470] New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464470 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-01 05:39:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318174) --

[Bug 464470] New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464470 --- Comment #2 from Rahul Bhalerao [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-01 06:54:52 EDT --- Bug filed upstream at,

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #34 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-01 07:25:53 EDT --- /etc/fonts/fonts.dtd defines that compare

[Bug 465074] New: FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465074 Summary: FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9 Product: Fedora

[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-01 22:29:33 EDT --- Will you update this un-extra-fonts

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-03 00:05:51 EDT --- Nicolas, I feel like this would be a good

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-03 02:14:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319318) --

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-03 02:21:54 EDT --- Well comment 12 is after fixing rpmlint

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-03 03:52:08 EDT --- Better would be to suggest to upstream not

[Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #14 from Subhodip Biswas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-05 14:27:03 EDT --- ok ..will fix them soon -- Configure

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 465900] Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465900 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 465900] Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465900 --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-06 23:27:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) It seems that

[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-07 12:13:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) rpmlint on binary

[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-07 13:01:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) (In reply to

[Bug 466029] New: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466029 Summary: fonts.dir refers to non-existent

[Bug 429527] [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429527 errata-xmlrpc [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 465074] FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465074 John Poelstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 466404] New: Segmentation fault.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Segmentation fault. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 Summary: Segmentation fault. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide

[Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 466404] Segmentation fault.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 466404] Segmentation fault.

( See Also bug 317641 ). Then fontforge uses ibm-type1 fonts(cour.pfa) $ rpm -q --changelog xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 |less * Mon Jan 14 2008 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 7.2-6 - IBM refused to relicense ibm-type1 fonts with permission to modify, so they were dropped (bugzilla 317641

[Bug 466404] Segmentation fault.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 --- Comment #3 from sangu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 08:54:40 EDT --- Whenever fontforge crashes, /var/log/Xorg.0.log

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Nils Philippsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #9 from Michal Jaegermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 10:47:35 EDT --- did you restart your desktop after

[Bug 466404] Segmentation fault.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 --- Comment #2 from sangu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 06:59:15 EDT --- After adding Gdraw.ScreenWidthInches: 23 in

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #10 from Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 11:05:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) OK. Any obvious way

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #11 from Michal Jaegermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 13:19:40 EDT --- A font which shows up in example

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #12 from Michal Jaegermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 13:23:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320034) --

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #13 from Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 13:35:45 EDT --- If it's not the fonts or the font caches then

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #14 from Michal Jaegermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 14:55:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320048) --

[Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 16:51:21 EDT --- Thanks. Now that the legal part is

[Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 16:57:42 EDT --- I don't think one is supposed to be

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #16 from Michal Jaegermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 19:10:32 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320078) --

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #15 from Michal Jaegermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-10 19:08:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320077) --

[Bug 466595] New: Needless ghost files (fonts.cache-*).

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Needless ghost files (fonts.cache-*). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466595 Summary: Needless ghost files (fonts.cache-*). Product:

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #19 from Michal Jaegermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-11 14:04:36 EDT --- ... mangled text display is a

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #21 from Michal Jaegermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-11 14:42:44 EDT --- But usually you'd notice other

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-11 14:49:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) But usually

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #23 from Michal Jaegermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-11 20:09:06 EDT --- ... or worse: broken hardware. I

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #24 from Michal Jaegermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-11 20:10:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320127) --

[Bug 466672] New: Missing fontconfig scriplets

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Missing fontconfig scriplets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 Summary: Missing fontconfig scriplets Product: Fedora

[Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 466678] Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 --- Comment #1 from Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-12 14:13:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320147) --

[Bug 466678] New: Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 Summary: Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-12 21:07:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4)

[Bug 466667] cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=47 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-12 22:53:24 EDT --- (Ok, sorry this probably my fault since I

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Subhodip Biswas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 466667] cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=47 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-13 02:19:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) (Ok, sorry

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-13 02:22:42 EDT --- we don't have any mixed-case package

[Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-13 02:29:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) I still don't

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >