nm/nm-applet - how to stop automatic connections

2009-08-11 Thread Mail Llists
If I have connected once to a wifi network - and that was an auto found connection - I can edit it and choose to not connect automatically. For a an auto found connection which I cannot and/or dont want to ever connect to automatically - i cannot unelect 'connect automatically' and save. The

Not all hardware are well recognized on TOSHIBA

2009-08-11 Thread tewi
I have a TOSHIBA m355, but the video card(Radeon Mobility 3470), bluetooth(I don't know the model), finger print(??? 1610) are not recognized. Shall I download and install the *ugly* driver from the companies' support site? Thanks. -- language: Chinese, Japanese, English -- fedora-list mailing l

FC-11 M2N-MX acpi

2009-08-11 Thread Paul Erickson
I have encountered a problem with FC-11 86_64 and my Asus M2N-MX board. I originally installed FC-11 fine with 2 GB of Ram, but when I went to increase it to 4 GB, ran into problems. The M2N-MX boots in Fedora Core 11 with 2 GB of RAM. With 4 GB of RAM, the boot fails (and scrambles the video)

No sound with Mplayer and (certain live) streaming video

2009-08-11 Thread Suvayu Ali
Hi everyone, I posted this on the rpmfusion-users list, but there hasn't been a single reply in over 4 days. Thought someone here might be able to help... TIA Original Message Subject: No sound with Mplayer and (certain live) streaming video Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:58:42 -0

Re: still no resolution solution..

2009-08-11 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 08/11/2009 11:40 PM, charles zeitler wrote: > i just downloaded ati's driver (it's proprietary ...). fglrx doesn't work with F11 yet. No support from ATI yet for the newer kernels. > i also have radeonhd ...i haven't figured out how to set it up > as the current driver... edit your /etc/X11

Re: still no resolution solution..

2009-08-11 Thread charles zeitler
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > charles zeitler wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >>> charles zeitler wrote: >>> am now running fedora 11 on 64 bit hardware, & still unable to achieve 1600x1200 display, as on fedora 10. >> >>

Re: Totem missing (installed) gstreamer RPMs on F11

2009-08-11 Thread Andre Costa
Found it no bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513908 On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:16, Andre Costa wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed F11 (loving it so far, great improvement over F10, kudos > to all). My main problem is totem. > > If I try to play a Quicktime movie it correctly

Re: Building Emacs 23.1 from rawhide for F11

2009-08-11 Thread suvayu ali
2009/8/11 Braden McDaniel : > On 8/11/09 3:50 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: >> I have been using the emacs build in the rawhide repositories on my F11 >> system. (version 23.0.93.1) Now since emacs 23.1 is out, I would like to >> use that. But trying to install the rawhide build pulls in glibc as a >> depe

Re: Building Emacs 23.1 from rawhide for F11

2009-08-11 Thread Braden McDaniel
On 8/11/09 3:50 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: Hello everyone, I have been using the emacs build in the rawhide repositories on my F11 system. (version 23.0.93.1) Now since emacs 23.1 is out, I would like to use that. But trying to install the rawhide build pulls in glibc as a dependency from rawhide. Si

Re: Building Emacs 23.1 from rawhide for F11

2009-08-11 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 12:58 PM, Armin Moradi wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: So far I have downloaded the srpm for the rawhide emacs build however when I use `sudo yum-builddep --enablerepo=rawhide emacs' yum asks to install the build dependencies from rawhide. I u

Re: Building Emacs 23.1 from rawhide for F11

2009-08-11 Thread Armin Moradi
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have been using the emacs build in the rawhide repositories on my F11 > system. (version 23.0.93.1) Now since emacs 23.1 is out, I would like to use > that. But trying to install the rawhide build pulls in glibc as a depende

Building Emacs 23.1 from rawhide for F11

2009-08-11 Thread Suvayu Ali
Hello everyone, I have been using the emacs build in the rawhide repositories on my F11 system. (version 23.0.93.1) Now since emacs 23.1 is out, I would like to use that. But trying to install the rawhide build pulls in glibc as a dependency from rawhide. Since its a crucial library I didn't g

Re: Logs of the attempts to connect to a SMTP server

2009-08-11 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> Where can one find the log of the attempts to connect to a SMTP >> server, in particular the log referring to the authentication process? >> Any ideas > > Postfix outputs into /var/log/maillog. I suspect other major MTAs do as > well.

Re: F10 > F11 issues

2009-08-11 Thread Tom Brown
The kernel-xen above is lower than 2.6.26 and causes the conflict. You need to remove it prior to the upgrade: rpm --erase kernel-xen thanks - that did the trick -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guideli

Re: iBus

2009-08-11 Thread John Aldrich
On Tuesday 11 August 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/12/2009 12:36 AM, John Aldrich wrote: > > If I'm not going to be using any foreign languages, do I even *need* > > iBus? > > > >>From what I was able to Google, it's only for i18n stuff, correct? If > >> I only > > > > care about "western" la

Re: F11: LiveCD problems

2009-08-11 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
Kevin J. Cummings wrote: On 08/11/2009 02:07 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: Tim wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:35 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: But it could not locate: /dev/sda1-15 (Seagate 1TB SATA disk) [Fedora/Ubuntu/Debian] (BRAND NEW) The 1TB drive already has F8 & F

Re: iBus

2009-08-11 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/12/2009 12:36 AM, John Aldrich wrote: > If I'm not going to be using any foreign languages, do I even *need* iBus? >>From what I was able to Google, it's only for i18n stuff, correct? If I only > care about "western" languages (and pretty much ONLY English) I should be > safe to uninstall

iBus

2009-08-11 Thread John Aldrich
If I'm not going to be using any foreign languages, do I even *need* iBus? >From what I was able to Google, it's only for i18n stuff, correct? If I only care about "western" languages (and pretty much ONLY English) I should be safe to uninstall all that stuff, right? Thanks! -- fedora-list ma

Re: How to rescue an encrypted root filesystem?

2009-08-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:39:56 -0700, tatt...@newsguy.com wrote: > > I'd still like to know how to mount the encrypted filesystem that > Fedora creates when you select the encrypted filesystem option at > install time. Even if it's only for my own intellectual curiosity. You use cryptsetup l

Re: F10 > F11 issues

2009-08-11 Thread Kam Leo
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:49:35 +0100, Tom wrote: > >> >> > >> > What do you get for  rpm -qa kernel\*  ? >> > >> >> # rpm -qa kernel\* >> kernel-2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 >> kernel-devel-2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686 >> kernel-headers-2.6.27.29-170.

RE: Livecd-creator exclude packages

2009-08-11 Thread Jens Ruda
> > Hi > > > > I have my own *-logos package (liveos-logos-0.1-1.noarch.rpm). > > > > The problem is that I cant exclude fedora-logos and generic-logis at the > > same time in my kickstart file. > > > > This is the error from livecd-creator: > > Error creating Live CD : Failed to build transact

Re: F11: LiveCD problems

2009-08-11 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 08/11/2009 02:07 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > Tim wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:35 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> >>> But it could not locate: >>> >>> /dev/sda1-15 (Seagate 1TB SATA disk) [Fedora/Ubuntu/Debian] (BRAND >>> NEW) >>> >>> The 1TB drive already has F8 & F9 installed. >>

Re: F10 > F11 issues

2009-08-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:49:35 +0100, Tom wrote: > > > > > What do you get for rpm -qa kernel\* ? > > > > # rpm -qa kernel\* > kernel-2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 > kernel-devel-2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686 > kernel-headers-2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.i386 > kernel-PAE-2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.i686 > kernel

Re: F11: LiveCD problems

2009-08-11 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
Tim wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:35 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: But it could not locate: /dev/sda1-15 (Seagate 1TB SATA disk) [Fedora/Ubuntu/Debian] (BRAND NEW) The 1TB drive already has F8 & F9 installed. Can you say what SATA hardware you have? Someone with the same chipse

Re: Livecd-creator exclude packages

2009-08-11 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/11/2009 11:34 PM, Jens Ruda wrote: > Hi > > I have my own *-logos package (liveos-logos-0.1-1.noarch.rpm). > > The problem is that I cant exclude fedora-logos and generic-logis at the > same time in my kickstart file. > > This is the error from livecd-creator: > Error creating Live CD : Fa

Re: F11: LiveCD problems

2009-08-11 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
Kam Leo wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Tim wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:35 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: But it could not locate: /dev/sda1-15 (Seagate 1TB SATA disk) [Fedora/Ubuntu/Debian] (BRAND NEW) The 1TB drive already has F8 & F9 installed. Can you say wha

Livecd-creator exclude packages

2009-08-11 Thread Jens Ruda
Hi I have my own *-logos package (liveos-logos-0.1-1.noarch.rpm). The problem is that I cant exclude fedora-logos and generic-logis at the same time in my kickstart file. This is the error from livecd-creator: Error creating Live CD : Failed to build transaction : liveos-logos conflicts wi

Re: Problem in upgrading to Fedora 11

2009-08-11 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 10:52 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 08/11/2009 11:20 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: Does that mean that now rpm in F10 uses 256 bit hashes? Could you confirm that? The latest update can understand it. Rahul Thanks Rahul -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.

Re: Problem in upgrading to Fedora 11

2009-08-11 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/11/2009 11:20 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > Hello Jayakrishnan > > On Tuesday 11 August 2009 04:51 AM, Jayakrishnan M wrote: >> I was able to fix the issue today. The rpm package on Fedora 10 was >> not updated. I did a yum update rpm and was able to install the fedora >> 11 release package afterw

Re: Problem in upgrading to Fedora 11

2009-08-11 Thread Suvayu Ali
Hello Jayakrishnan On Tuesday 11 August 2009 04:51 AM, Jayakrishnan M wrote: I was able to fix the issue today. The rpm package on Fedora 10 was not updated. I did a yum update rpm and was able to install the fedora 11 release package afterwards. Does that mean that now rpm in F10 uses 256 bi

Re: F10 > F11 issues

2009-08-11 Thread Tom Brown
What do you get for rpm -qa kernel\* ? # rpm -qa kernel\* kernel-2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 kernel-devel-2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686 kernel-headers-2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.i386 kernel-PAE-2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.i686 kernel-firmware-2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.noarch kerneloops-0.12-2.fc10.i386 ker

Re: why root to set default desktop background?

2009-08-11 Thread Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)
On 11/08/09 18:38, Mike Wright wrote: --snip-- Felt like I had a bag over my > head and somebody had rearranged the furniture :( > > :m) > What makes you believe it didn't happen dududu dadada :D -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/

Re: why root to set default desktop background?

2009-08-11 Thread Mike Wright
Todd Zullinger wrote: Mike Wright wrote: This sure seems ridiculous to me. I changed my desktop background. No problem. But when I chose "Make Default" I was notified that takes super user permissions. What the heck is that about? This is the user. This is the user's desktop. It's not. T

Re: F10 > F11 issues

2009-08-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:31:21 +0100, Tom wrote: > Hi > > Trying to upgrade from 10 to 11 and i get this > > Is this ok [y/N]: y > Downloading Packages: > Running rpm_check_debug > ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: > kernel conflicts with DeviceKit-disks-004-4.fc11.i586 > Complete! > (1, [u'

F10 > F11 issues

2009-08-11 Thread Tom Brown
Hi Trying to upgrade from 10 to 11 and i get this Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: kernel conflicts with DeviceKit-disks-004-4.fc11.i586 Complete! (1, [u'Please report this error in http://yum.baseurl.org/report']) # uname

Re: why root to set default desktop background?

2009-08-11 Thread Todd Zullinger
Mike Wright wrote: > This sure seems ridiculous to me. > > I changed my desktop background. No problem. But when I chose > "Make Default" I was notified that takes super user permissions. > What the heck is that about? > > This is the user. This is the user's desktop. It's not. The 'Make defau

Cannot log onto 10.4 Mac Server from FC11

2009-08-11 Thread matt tobin
When I try to log in with user credentials from my FC11 machine to a Mac OSX 10.4 server I get: *There is a problem with the configuration server (/usr/libexec/gconf-sanity-check-2 exited with status 256)* I've tried chmod 1777 on the /tmp directory with no success. I've renamed gconf to gconf.

why root to set default desktop background?

2009-08-11 Thread Mike Wright
Hi all, This sure seems ridiculous to me. I changed my desktop background. No problem. But when I chose "Make Default" I was notified that takes super user permissions. What the heck is that about? This is the user. This is the user's desktop. I can imagine the boss being thrilled to de

Re: FC 11 Boot mode single user [recovery password]

2009-08-11 Thread suvayu ali
2009/8/11 Jerry Feldman : > On 08/10/2009 06:39 PM, suvayu ali wrote: >>> umount /mnt/sysimage >>> > >>> > The reboot. The umount is very important. >>> >> Just for knowledge's sake, why is the umount so important? >> > Actually, before the umount, you probably want to exit the chroot shell. > umou

Re: still no resolution solution..

2009-08-11 Thread Ed Greshko
charles zeitler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> charles zeitler wrote: >> >>> am now running fedora 11 on 64 bit hardware, >>> & still unable to achieve 1600x1200 display, >>> as on fedora 10. >>> > > >> Can't say I recall your previous mailings..

Re: Problems of starting VLC

2009-08-11 Thread Jim
On 08/10/2009 10:00 PM, Tim wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 21:20 -0400, Jim wrote: FC11, Trying to play a .WMV in Thunderbird I get this error, what does it mean. /media/1/usr/bin/vlc: error while loading shared libraries: libvlc.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Re: DontZap false not working

2009-08-11 Thread Major Péter
Thanks for the quick answer, it works like a charm. Peter 2009-08-11 16:27 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta: On 08/11/2009 07:55 PM, Major Péter wrote: Hi all, I recently have noticed, that the Ctrl + Alt + Backspace combo isn't working in the Fedora 11. After I read the Release Notes, I crea

Re: DontZap false not working

2009-08-11 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/11/2009 07:55 PM, Major Péter wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently have noticed, that the Ctrl + Alt + Backspace combo isn't > working in the Fedora 11. After I read the Release Notes, I created the > /etc/X11/xorg.conf file with the content: > Section "ServerFlags" > Option "DontZap" "false" > E

DontZap false not working

2009-08-11 Thread Major Péter
Hi all, I recently have noticed, that the Ctrl + Alt + Backspace combo isn't working in the Fedora 11. After I read the Release Notes, I created the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file with the content: Section "ServerFlags" Option "DontZap" "false" EndSection After that I had restarted the computer (lat

Re: FC 11 Boot mode single user [recovery password]

2009-08-11 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Jerry Feldman wrote: > Actually, before the umount, you probably want to exit the chroot shell. > umount is important in that it forces all data to be written. If you did > a proper shutdown, the file system mounted on /mnt/sysimage would be > unmounted during the shutdown process, but my backgroun

Re: FC 11 Boot mode single user [recovery password]

2009-08-11 Thread Jerry Feldman
On 08/10/2009 06:39 PM, suvayu ali wrote: >> umount /mnt/sysimage >> > >> > The reboot. The umount is very important. >> > Just for knowledge's sake, why is the umount so important? > Actually, before the umount, you probably want to exit the chroot shell. umount is important in that it for

Re: unable to play silverlight video on FC11

2009-08-11 Thread Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)
On 11/08/09 14:32, Jatin K wrote: > On 08/11/2009 06:20 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: >--snip-- >> > after installing OPERA ... I'm able to play that video in > stand-alone-player ... BTW why moolight plugin is not working with > firefox ... > Moonlight-plugin has nothing to do with Fedora-devs. You

Re: unable to play silverlight video on FC11

2009-08-11 Thread Jatin K
On 08/11/2009 06:20 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: On 08/11/2009 02:44 PM, Jatin K wrote: ... well .. I'm not getting " view in stand-alone player" option on the page ... is there any extra plugin that I need to install to get the said option ? if yes then please guide me how to install that plugin

Totem missing (installed) gstreamer RPMs on F11

2009-08-11 Thread Andre Costa
Hi, I just installed F11 (loving it so far, great improvement over F10, kudos to all). My main problem is totem. If I try to play a Quicktime movie it correctly realizes that it needs some codecs and identifies the related GStreamer RPMs. However, when I click "install" it says the files are alre

Re: unable to play silverlight video on FC11

2009-08-11 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 08/11/2009 02:44 PM, Jatin K wrote: ... well .. I'm not getting " view in stand-alone player" option on the page ... is there any extra plugin that I need to install to get the said option ? if yes then please guide me how to install that plugin I have vlc and mozilla-vlc from rpmfusion.

Re: unable to play silverlight video on FC11

2009-08-11 Thread Jatin K
On 08/11/2009 05:46 PM, Anne Wilson wrote: On Tuesday 11 August 2009 13:02:07 Mogens Kjaer wrote: On 08/11/2009 01:43 PM, Jatin K wrote: Hi all I've installed moonlight plug-in ( ALT of MS silverlight plug-in ) in my FC 11 but it is not working when I open [1] site it says that no

Re: unable to play silverlight video on FC11

2009-08-11 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 13:02:07 Mogens Kjaer wrote: > On 08/11/2009 01:43 PM, Jatin K wrote: > > Hi all > > > > > > I've installed moonlight plug-in ( ALT of MS silverlight plug-in ) in my > > FC 11 but it is not working > > > > when I open [1] site it says that no suitable plugin is available >

Re: unable to play silverlight video on FC11

2009-08-11 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 08/11/2009 01:43 PM, Jatin K wrote: Hi all I've installed moonlight plug-in ( ALT of MS silverlight plug-in ) in my FC 11 but it is not working when I open [1] site it says that no suitable plugin is available [1] http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2009/jul09/07-29release.mspx If

Re: Problem in upgrading to Fedora 11

2009-08-11 Thread Jayakrishnan M
Hello, Thanks Stan and Suvayu. Stan, > Why not try from a different source? Here is one in India. > I downloaded package from various sources, but gave the same error. > mirror. By the way, I would use rpm -ivh instead of rpm -Uvh. Might > not make a difference, but might. The update might de

unable to play silverlight video on FC11

2009-08-11 Thread Jatin K
Hi all I've installed moonlight plug-in ( ALT of MS silverlight plug-in ) in my FC 11 but it is not working when I open [1] site it says that no suitable plugin is available [1] http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2009/jul09/07-29release.mspx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@r

Re: Sorting Music by Composer

2009-08-11 Thread Ian Malone
2009/8/10 R. G. Newbury : > >> Around 07:51pm on Monday, August 10, 2009 (UK time), R. G. Newbury >> scrawled: >> >>> Does anyone know of a program with the flexibility to set things up this >>> way? >> >> Banshee can sort by composer, or any other tag.  You will need to right >> click on the headi

Re: gzip

2009-08-11 Thread Patrick Dupre
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Nifty Fedora Mitch wrote: On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:44:05PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: What is the difference in gzipping on a i386 and a x86_64 machine ? Both machine use the same version of gzip 1.3.12 but the gz file have a slightly different length (5 more bytes for