Re: [FFmpeg-devel] hi sir, where i can paste ffmpeg extract files on site. please help me.

I do not understand what you are asking. ffmpeg-devel is only for patch submissions and discussions related to the development of FFmpeg. Questions involving the FFmpeg command-line interface tools should be asked at the ffmpeg-user mailing list. Questions involving the FFmpeg libraries should

[FFmpeg-devel] hi sir, where i can paste ffmpeg extract files on site. please help me.

-- Thanks & Regards. * "G.SURESH"* ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

[FFmpeg-devel] matroskadec: prevent access of elements after freeing

When using the decode interrupt feature of ffmpeg may causing crashes by accessing previous freed pointers in matroska_read_close. The attached patch will reset nb_elem to zero after freeing the elements because ffmpeg normally tests for nb_elem. Feedback for sure is warmly welcome. Regards

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 05:31:39PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 07:30:24PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 06:49:35PM +0100, Michael

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffserver: Remove last use of AVStream size

On 11/27/2016 7:29 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer >> --- >> ffserver.c | 18 -- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On 11/27/2016 8:53 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > On 28.11.2016 00:37, James Almer wrote: >> On 11/27/2016 8:23 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>> This can't happen while ffserver still uses internal API, and when it >>> doesn't >>> making it standalone isn't really useful, in particular because a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016/11/27 23:56, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 27 November 2016 at 23:20, James Almer > wrote: > >> On 11/26/2016 6:00 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: >>> On 26 October 2016 at 23:43, Rostislav Pehlivanov >>>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On 27 November 2016 at 23:20, James Almer wrote: > On 11/26/2016 6:00 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > On 26 October 2016 at 23:43, Rostislav Pehlivanov > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 26 October 2016 at 23:33, Andreas Cadhalpun < > >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] travis.yml: Whitelist "coverity" branch in preparation for Coverity integration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016/11/27 23:47, Timothy Gu wrote: > --- .travis.yml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > This patch will needed to be applied to all Git branches because of > a Travis CI restriction: >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On 28.11.2016 00:37, James Almer wrote: > On 11/27/2016 8:23 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> This can't happen while ffserver still uses internal API, and when it doesn't >> making it standalone isn't really useful, in particular because a standalone >> version can't be tested with FATE. > > We

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] travis.yml: Whitelist "coverity" branch in preparation for Coverity integration

--- .travis.yml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) This patch will needed to be applied to all Git branches because of a Travis CI restriction: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/customizing-the-build#Building-Specific-Branches diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml index e541ee1..a50c46d

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On 11/27/2016 8:23 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > On 28.11.2016 00:14, James Almer wrote: >> On 11/27/2016 7:32 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>> On 26.11.2016 22:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: Since a month has passed, reynaldo still hasn't responded, I think it's long overdue to push

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] lavfi: make filter_frame non-recursive.

On 28.11.2016 00:23, Nicolas George wrote: > L'octidi 8 frimaire, an CCXXV, Andreas Cadhalpun a écrit : >> Sure, but that conflict should be easy to resolve. > > Easy, yes. But it must be done at each rebase, that is annoying. Wasted > time that can be better used. I'm not sure I understand.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On 28.11.2016 00:14, James Almer wrote: > On 11/27/2016 7:32 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> On 26.11.2016 22:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: >>> Since a month has passed, reynaldo still hasn't responded, I think it's >>> long overdue to push this patch. I've attached a new version of the patch

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] lavfi: make filter_frame non-recursive.

L'octidi 8 frimaire, an CCXXV, Andreas Cadhalpun a écrit : > Sure, but that conflict should be easy to resolve. Easy, yes. But it must be done at each rebase, that is annoying. Wasted time that can be better used. > Worst case would be that if the deprecation isn't added before the next >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] lavfi: make filter_frame non-recursive.

On 28.11.2016 00:11, Nicolas George wrote: > L'octidi 8 frimaire, an CCXXV, Andreas Cadhalpun a écrit : >> How would it conflict with this patch? >> Unless I misunderstood something the deprecation should only affect the >> public API, while this change should only affect the internal parts, >> so

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On 11/26/2016 6:00 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 26 October 2016 at 23:43, Rostislav Pehlivanov > wrote: > >> >> >> On 26 October 2016 at 23:33, Andreas Cadhalpun < >> andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 27.10.2016 00:16, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On 11/27/2016 7:32 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > On 26.11.2016 22:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: >> Since a month has passed, reynaldo still hasn't responded, I think it's >> long overdue to push this patch. I've attached a new version of the patch >> which only removes the ffserver program

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] lavfi: make filter_frame non-recursive.

L'octidi 8 frimaire, an CCXXV, Andreas Cadhalpun a écrit : > How would it conflict with this patch? > Unless I misunderstood something the deprecation should only affect the > public API, while this change should only affect the internal parts, > so the only possible conflict could be in

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] lavfi: make filter_frame non-recursive.

On 27.11.2016 17:08, Nicolas George wrote: > Changed the private fields: directly in avfilter.h with discreet ifdef > (preferred by Clément) with guarding reserved field (must urgent > countermeasure). Thanks. > I made a few tests and it seems making AVFilterLink completely opaque would > be

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAlg7ZnwACgkQ+NaxlGp1aC7rHQCfeMtiAL4kPwIFd37da56aFtVY eiEAn3Vh0A63CcNSu6MuGVuo8p5U/CJw =eJcJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] pngdec: check if previous frame exists instead of trusting sequence_number

On 27.11.2016 04:07, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:36:48PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> pngdec.c |3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> 141d5230c97dbc47e0b291f660544cfe57abbf7c >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On 26.11.2016 22:00, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > Since a month has passed, reynaldo still hasn't responded, I think it's > long overdue to push this patch. I've attached a new version of the patch > which only removes the ffserver program (without touching anything else), > which had been OK'd

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffserver: Remove last use of AVStream size

Hi, On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > --- > ffserver.c | 18 -- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ffserver.c b/ffserver.c > index

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On 27.11.2016 19:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > If somethig critical remains, please someone list exactly what that is. > so reynaldo, i or others can go over the list and look into the issues As far as I'm aware the following points are most problematic: * ffserver uses internal functions,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

Hi, On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 07:30:24PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 06:49:35PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

> 3. Proprietary dependencies, which may or may not currently be an issue > anymore. Philip and Timo, how easy is it to get cuda/nvenc/cuvid/npp to > compile. > cuda/cuvid/nvenc don't need any external dependencies to compile, only to run. libnpp needs proprietary and non-redistributable headers

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:52 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > I dont want to give a automated travis_ci system any write or admin > access, some of what i read hinted in that direction, some of what > i read hinted that this was not needed though > giving a automated

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:13 PM Philip Langdale wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 21:26:13 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and OS.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 21:26:13 +0100 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016/11/27 19:00, Philip Langdale wrote: > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > >> Hi all > >> The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and >> OS. the OS will no longer get

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and OS.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavfi/ebur128: relicense to LGPL

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:40:43PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 11/26/16, Clement Boesch wrote: > > All copyright holders have agreed to the relicensing. > > > > Approved-by: Andreas Cadhalpun > > Approved-by: David Sedacca

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavfi/ebur128: relicense to LGPL

On 11/26/16, Clement Boesch wrote: > All copyright holders have agreed to the relicensing. > > Approved-by: Andreas Cadhalpun > Approved-by: David Sedacca > Approved-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde > Approved-by: Jean

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] tools/coverity: Add models for av_mallocz and av_free

This should deal with some false positives, but might lead to more of them depending on whether it realises that av_freep() wraps av_free() or not. Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale --- tools/coverity.c | 28 +--- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and OS. > the OS will no longer get security updates in a few months and the hw > does not

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 07:46:34PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: [...] > > You can fix a ton of little things in it, but unless the fundamental > > problems are addressed (ZERO internal API usage + at least partial FATE > > coverage) it's pointless > > of course the goal is ZERO internal API

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 07:30:24PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 06:49:35PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:25:18PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > [...] > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 02:05:44PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:00:41PM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > On 26 October 2016 at 23:43, Rostislav Pehlivanov > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 26 October 2016 at 23:33, Andreas Cadhalpun

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 06:49:35PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:25:18PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > [...] > > > ffserver had 14 commits to it in about the last month > > > > That's also

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffserver: Remove last use of AVStream size

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- ffserver.c | 18 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/ffserver.c b/ffserver.c index ded5149..9b1f6d5 100644 --- a/ffserver.c +++ b/ffserver.c @@ -2961,7 +2961,6 @@ static int

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ffserver: drop FeedData, its unused

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- ffserver.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/ffserver.c b/ffserver.c index d40fe80..6b8eb2c 100644 --- a/ffserver.c +++ b/ffserver.c @@ -187,11 +187,6 @@ typedef struct HTTPContext { uint8_t

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ffserver: Remove some deprecated API use related to codec/codecpar

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- ffserver.c | 8 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/ffserver.c b/ffserver.c index 1d8abd9..ded5149 100644 --- a/ffserver.c +++ b/ffserver.c @@ -2288,8 +2288,6 @@ static int

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ffserver: Remove use of AVStream as a intermediate to store parameters

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- ffserver.c| 91 +-- ffserver_config.c | 6 ++-- ffserver_config.h | 20 +++- 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/ffserver.c

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:25:18PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > [...] > > ffserver had 14 commits to it in about the last month > > That's also pretty close to the number of commits in the last years. > > Good will in the

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] lavfi: make filter_frame non-recursive.

A lot of changes happen at the same time: - Add a framequeue fifo to AVFilterLink. - split AVFilterLink.status into status_in and status_out: requires changes to the few filters and programs that use it directly (f_interleave, split, filtfmts). - Add a field ready to AVFilterContext,

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] lavfi: add FFFrameQueue API.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas George --- libavfilter/Makefile | 1 + libavfilter/framequeue.c | 123 + libavfilter/framequeue.h | 173 +++ 3 files changed, 297 insertions(+) create mode 100644

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:25:18PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: [...] > ffserver had 14 commits to it in about the last month That's also pretty close to the number of commits in the last years. Good will in the last weeks is not enough of a technical merit/justification to prevent the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 02:33:54PM +0100, wm4 wrote: > On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:05:44 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:00:41PM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > > On 26 October 2016 at 23:43, Rostislav Pehlivanov

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:05:44 +0100 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:00:41PM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > On 26 October 2016 at 23:43, Rostislav Pehlivanov > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 26 October 2016 at

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ffserver: Remove extract_mpeg4_header()

On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:39:06 -0500 "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > This should not be needed, our AVParsers should do this > > I do not have a testcase though, please help

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ffserver: use AVStream.codecpar in open_input_stream()"

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:13:04PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Fixes null pointer dereference > > Testcase is simply a ffmpeg instance sending a stream to ffserver while > another ffmpeg reads from it > > This reverts commit 6f0a1710d77dde0d803861506a2157a23f08c14c. > --- > ffserver.c

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Remove the ffserver program and the ffm muxer/demuxer

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:00:41PM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 26 October 2016 at 23:43, Rostislav Pehlivanov > wrote: > > > > > > > On 26 October 2016 at 23:33, Andreas Cadhalpun < > > andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 27.10.2016 00:16,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: check for stdatomic.h

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:54:53PM -0800, Wan-Teh Chang wrote: > From: Anton Khirnov > > Since this is a C11 feature, it requires -std=c11. > > Not actually used for anything yet, that will be added in the following > commits. > > This merges libav commit

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] WIP: subtitles in AVFrame

Le decadi 30 brumaire, an CCXXV, Clement Boesch a écrit : > Right, I'll probably need that for the sub2video filter. I'll think about > it unless you want to implement it yourself. As always, for me, time is the limiting factor. For now, I believe the only urgent thing to do is to decide what

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavfi/avfiltergraph: always reduce all_layouts to a single layout

Le tridi 3 frimaire, an CCXXV, Marton Balint a écrit : > I thought we are trying to move away from workarounds introduced only to be > able to be compatible with libav API. So this is clearly libav dirving > ffmpeg development, which is not fortunate IMHO. > > I also think that the chance of an

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC]MAINTAINERS: Add developers who have git write access but are otherwise not listed

Le sextidi 6 frimaire, an CCXXV, compn a écrit : > if one wants to be worried about security issues, there are bigger fish > to fry. Hardly ever a valid argument. > for one example, how about any and all patches applied to ffmpeg by > various distros ? > because this is a real threat to our