Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffmpeg: don't fail to explicitly set a decoder for an unknown stream type

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:37:57PM -0500, Rodger Combs wrote: > --- > ffmpeg_opt.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/ffmpeg_opt.c b/ffmpeg_opt.c > index c217462..84b312d 100644 > --- a/ffmpeg_opt.c > +++ b/ffmpeg_opt.c > @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static AVCodec

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] does the latest ffmpeg support h264 SVC

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 14:50:32 +0800, qw wrote: > Does the latest ffmpeg support H.264 SVC? No. > Why ffmpeg doesn't support H.264 SVC? Because nobody has bothered to implement it yet. Are you volunteering? ;-) The next question: Why has nobody bothered? Because there seems to be little

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffmpeg: don't fail to explicitly set a decoder for an unknown stream type

--- ffmpeg_opt.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ffmpeg_opt.c b/ffmpeg_opt.c index c217462..84b312d 100644 --- a/ffmpeg_opt.c +++ b/ffmpeg_opt.c @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static AVCodec *find_codec_or_die(const char *name, enum AVMediaType type, int e

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add loudnorm

On 5/18/16, Paul B Mahol wrote: > Dana 16. 5. 2016. 10:26 osoba "Paul B Mahol" napisala > je: >> >> On 5/15/16, Kyle Swanson wrote: >> > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> >> On 5/14/16, Kyle Swanson

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/tee: Move to new BSF API

Hello Nicolas, I am sorry for a delayed reply, On 05/12/2016 12:17 PM, Nicolas George wrote: Le quartidi 24 floréal, an CCXXIV, Jan Sebechlebsky a écrit : I can change it to array, the advantage of using linked list was that number of bitstream filters used is not known before arguments are

[FFmpeg-devel] IRC meeting

Hi, I want to propose to have an FFmpeg IRC meeting on the Saturday of the next week, Saturday May 28, UTC 17. Candidate topics of the day: - Code of Conduct and policy around it - technical development issues - misc topics Feel free to propose other topics. Best regards.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer.texi: Add a code of conduct

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > --- > doc/developer.texi | 29 + > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) > I agree to this addition. I think having this

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] avcodec/aacenc_is: Assert that minthr is not 0.0, this would lead to division by 0 later

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > yes, > > with the patch fate fails: > > Test aac-pred-encode failed. Look at tests/data/fate/aac-pred-encode.err for > details. > make: *** [fate-aac-pred-encode] Error 134 > > >> >> A threshold of 0 would in

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer.texi: Add a code of conduct

Am 18.05.16 um 20:40 schrieb Michael Niedermayer: > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > --- > doc/developer.texi | 29 + > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) I agree. -Thilo ___ ffmpeg-devel

[FFmpeg-devel] [Vote] Code of Conduct

This is the version i had in my pending branch and should be the last version of the Code of Conduct from march, IIRC there where no further comments on the last version, so iam calling everyone to vote on this. Everyone because it should be binding to everyone. Kieran and Thilo asked for a

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer.texi: Add a code of conduct

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- doc/developer.texi | 29 + 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi index 6db93ce..4d3a7ae 100644 --- a/doc/developer.texi +++ b/doc/developer.texi @@ -403,6

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:32:13PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > > > I would agree, but for some reason Carl feels he is exempt > > from the FFmpeg developer rules. > > I should probably add that this is an interesting comment > coming from somebody who

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:30:25PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 5/18/2016 10:29 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > > > >> Please attach actual patch with commit log message. > > > > As soon as you give a helpful comment for the Babyphone patch;-) > > He asked

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On 5/18/2016 10:29 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > >> Please attach actual patch with commit log message. > > As soon as you give a helpful comment for the Babyphone patch;-) He asked you to follow the FFmpeg patch submit rules, which requires the usage of git

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Tee improvement - discussion

Hello Marton, sorry for a delayed reply. On 05/16/2016 01:20 AM, Marton Balint wrote: On Wed, 11 May 2016, Jan Sebechlebsky wrote: Hi, I'll be working on tee muxer improvement during GSoC 2016 and I thought maybe it is a good idea to ask about ideas which any of you might have regarding

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add loudnorm

Dana 16. 5. 2016. 10:26 osoba "Paul B Mahol" napisala je: > > On 5/15/16, Kyle Swanson wrote: > > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> On 5/14/16, Kyle Swanson wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> If nobody else has any

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

Le decadi 30 floréal, an CCXXIV, Derek Buitenhuis a écrit : > Frankly, this is nothing nothing but an ad hominem attack. > > I am tired of it. This happens constantly, and the community > is always silent[1], and far too accepting of such toxic behavior. > > It has given me far too much unneeded

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: add properties for lossless to AVCodecParameters

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:29:50PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 05:42:13PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer > > wrote: > > > On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 04:10:01PM +0200, wm4 wrote: > > >> On

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:24:53 +0200 wm4 wrote: > That's why it's important. But he keeps ignoring our requests to > change this, mostly because he disrespects us for working with his > sworn arch-enemy, Libav. comments like this are not helpful. -compn

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

Hi, On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:25 AM, compn wrote: > On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:12:40 +0200 > Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > Dana 18. 5. 2016. 16:05 osoba "compn" napisala je: > > > > > > On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:10:57 +0200 > > > Paul B Mahol

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:12:40 +0200 Paul B Mahol wrote: > Dana 18. 5. 2016. 16:05 osoba "compn" napisala je: > > > > On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:10:57 +0200 > > Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > > > On 5/18/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On Wed, 18 May 2016 10:05:41 -0400 compn wrote: > On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:10:57 +0200 > Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > On 5/18/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Attached patch allows to mux raw G.729 as supported by our G.729 >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:32:13PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > > > I would agree, but for some reason Carl feels he is exempt > > from the FFmpeg developer rules. > > I should probably add that this is an interesting comment > coming from somebody who

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat: Add Pro-MPEG CoP #3-R2 FEC protocol

> > Have you tested this on actual receivers? > Are you aware this won't work effectively because of the bursty nature of > FFmpeg? > > Kieran > Hello, I tested the FFmpeg version on a software receiver, not a hardware one. I initially implemented this for one of my applications based on

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

Dana 18. 5. 2016. 16:05 osoba "compn" napisala je: > > On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:10:57 +0200 > Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > On 5/18/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Attached patch allows to mux raw G.729 as supported by our G.729 >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On Wed, 18 May 2016 13:32:13 + (UTC) Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > > > I would agree, but for some reason Carl feels he is exempt > > from the FFmpeg developer rules. > > I should probably add that this is an interesting comment >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

Dana 18. 5. 2016. 15:29 osoba "Carl Eugen Hoyos" napisala je: > > Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > > > Please attach actual patch with commit log message. > > As soon as you give a helpful comment for the Babyphone patch;-) > Now it is official: I'm calling meeting to ban you

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:10:57 +0200 Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 5/18/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Attached patch allows to mux raw G.729 as supported by our G.729 > > demuxer. > > > > Please comment, Carl Eugen > > > > Please attach actual patch

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:41:46 +0100 Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 5/18/2016 2:30 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Since you indicated lately that you are so terribly interested > > in the tone here: > > Please stop making such comments! > > It's a legitimate criticism.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat: Add Pro-MPEG CoP #3-R2 FEC protocol

On Wed, 18 May 2016 at 13:52 Vlad Tarca wrote: > Fixed a type issue in xor added after the last modification and cleaned up > unnecessary NULL checks for av_dict_free > > Hi, Have you tested this on actual receivers? Are you aware this won't work effectively because of the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On 5/18/2016 2:32 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > I should probably add that this is an interesting comment > coming from somebody who breaks FFmpeg with nearly every > commit and not only absolutely refuses to work on fixes but > even blocks fixes if others want to help him. Frankly, this is

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On 5/18/2016 2:30 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Since you indicated lately that you are so terribly interested > in the tone here: > Please stop making such comments! It's a legitimate criticism. You refuse to follow the FFmpeg developer rules of using git format-patch. - Derek

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: [...] Since you indicated lately that you are so terribly interested in the tone here: Please stop making such comments! Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > I would agree, but for some reason Carl feels he is exempt > from the FFmpeg developer rules. I should probably add that this is an interesting comment coming from somebody who breaks FFmpeg with nearly every commit and not only absolutely refuses to work

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > Please attach actual patch with commit log message. As soon as you give a helpful comment for the Babyphone patch;-) Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On 5/18/2016 1:10 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > Please attach actual patch with commit log message. I would agree, but for some reason Carl feels he is exempt from the FFmpeg developer rules. - Derek ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Add AVClass to AVCodecParameters

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:49:44AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > Most of the major public structures contain an AVClass. > > > What are you hoping to accomplish with this struct that can

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat: Add Pro-MPEG CoP #3-R2 FEC protocol

Fixed a type issue in xor added after the last modification and cleaned up unnecessary NULL checks for av_dict_free Signed-off-by: Vlad Tarca --- Changelog | 1 + doc/general.texi| 1 + doc/protocols.texi | 35 libavformat/Makefile|

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

On 5/18/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Hi! > > Attached patch allows to mux raw G.729 as supported by our G.729 demuxer. > > Please comment, Carl Eugen > Please attach actual patch with commit log message. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/2] Update usage of SDL1 library to SDL2

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:00:21PM +0100, Josh de Kock wrote: [...] > Should I be replacing sdl.c instead of creating sdl2.c? This comes > under a more semantic question: should it be called SDL2? I'd say replace sdl.c and use .name = "sdl,sdl2"? It would be a shame to keep the SDL1 dependency

[FFmpeg-devel] does the latest ffmpeg support h264 SVC

Hi, I have one question about the function of the latest ffmepg. Does the latest ffmpeg support H.264 SVC? Why ffmpeg doesn't support H.264 SVC? Thanks! B.R. Andrew ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH]lavf/rawenc: Add a G.729 muxer

Hi! Attached patch allows to mux raw G.729 as supported by our G.729 demuxer. Please comment, Carl Eugen diff --git a/libavformat/Makefile b/libavformat/Makefile index 742aff5..59944b0 100644 --- a/libavformat/Makefile +++ b/libavformat/Makefile @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ OBJS-$(CONFIG_G722_MUXER)