Am Freitag 10 Oktober 2014, 12:57:21 schrieb Alexander Strasser:
> On 2014-10-07 08:13 -0700, Timothy Gu wrote:
> > On Oct 6, 2014 3:23 PM, "Alexander Strasser" wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > I have locally changed all other things requested by Timothy
> > >
> > > and Carl Eugen. I do not think the Li
On 2014-10-07 08:13 -0700, Timothy Gu wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2014 3:23 PM, "Alexander Strasser" wrote:
[...]
> > I have locally changed all other things requested by Timothy
> > and Carl Eugen. I do not think the Libav deprecation message
> > should be part of this news article. Probably putting it
On Oct 6, 2014 3:23 PM, "Alexander Strasser" wrote:
>
> On 2014-10-06 01:35 +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Timothy Gu gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > The bad news is that the package probably won't migrate to Debian
> > > testing in time for the upcoming release "Jessie". The Debian release
> >
On 2014-10-06 01:35 +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Timothy Gu gmail.com> writes:
>
> > The bad news is that the package probably won't migrate to Debian
> > testing in time for the upcoming release "Jessie". The Debian release
> > and security teams have made this decision because of concerns o
On 06.10.2014 14:05, compn wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:24:45 +0200
Clément Bœsch wrote:
Anyway, I don't think it's relevant to talk about that in that news.
Let's just move on. Libav fixed the message, it's cool, but it has
nothing to do with FFmpeg getting into Debian.
i brought it up beca
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:24:45 +0200
Clément Bœsch wrote:
> Anyway, I don't think it's relevant to talk about that in that news.
> Let's just move on. Libav fixed the message, it's cool, but it has
> nothing to do with FFmpeg getting into Debian.
i brought it up because its debian (and ubuntu) user
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 09:19:34PM -0400, compn wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:55:51 -0300
> James Almer wrote:
>
> > On 05/10/14 9:47 PM, compn wrote:
> > > On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 22:58:34 +0200
> > > Alexander Strasser wrote:
> > >> This is all RFC as marked in the subject. Please give me som
Timothy Gu gmail.com> writes:
> The bad news is that the package probably won't migrate to Debian
> testing in time for the upcoming release "Jessie". The Debian release
> and security teams have made this decision because of concerns of
> security and stability with interactions with other Debia
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:55:51 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 05/10/14 9:47 PM, compn wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 22:58:34 +0200
> > Alexander Strasser wrote:
> >> This is all RFC as marked in the subject. Please give me some
> >> feed back!
> >
> > could someone please add a note about th
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Alexander Strasser wrote:
> Try to shortly summarize where we are now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Strasser
> ---
>
> This is all RFC as marked in the subject. Please give me some
> feed back!
>
> It would also be nice if someone could test the patch, I
On 05/10/14 9:47 PM, compn wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 22:58:34 +0200
> Alexander Strasser wrote:
>> This is all RFC as marked in the subject. Please give me some
>> feed back!
>
> could someone please add a note about the deprecated message.
>
> something like:
>
> users on debian and ub
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 22:58:34 +0200
Alexander Strasser wrote:
> This is all RFC as marked in the subject. Please give me some
> feed back!
could someone please add a note about the deprecated message.
something like:
users on debian and ubuntu may have seen this message when using ffmpeg
"*
Alexander Strasser gmx.net> writes:
> A big thank you to all the people that made it possible.
Please make this:
A big thank you to Andreas Cadhalpun and all the people
that made it possible.
Thank you, Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpe
Try to shortly summarize where we are now.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Strasser
---
This is all RFC as marked in the subject. Please give me some
feed back!
It would also be nice if someone could test the patch, I do not
have the tools at hand ATM.
src/index | 16
1
14 matches
Mail list logo
