Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-06-06 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2018-06-06 8:50 GMT+02:00, Gyan Doshi : > configure, at present, allows all libraries in the nonfree > list to be built with the LGPL license without having to > pass --enable-nonfree. Is that intended? Yes, this is intended. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-deve

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-06-06 Thread Gyan Doshi
On 06-06-2018 12:05 PM, Roger Pack wrote: FWIW. It might be compatible with the LGPL. configure, at present, allows all libraries in the nonfree list to be built with the LGPL license without having to pass --enable-nonfree. Is that intended? Libav's script disables them if the flag isn'

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-06-05 Thread Roger Pack
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Ricardo Constantino wrote: > On 14 February 2018 at 12:56, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > > On 2018-02-14 13:50, Kyle Schwarz wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Schwarz > wrote:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread wm4
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:22:12 +0100 Nicolas George wrote: > Tomas Härdin (2018-02-14): > >Devs that work on companies that need > > the proprietary stuff that is. It's always a tradeoff. > > Devs that work on companies that need the proprietary stuff could ma

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > Tomas Härdin (2018-02-14): >> Devs that work on companies that need >> the proprietary stuff that is. It's always a tradeoff. > > Devs that work on companies that need the proprietary stuff could make > u

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2018-02-14 16:28 GMT+01:00 Maksym Veremeyenko : > NDI sdk has a dynamic library loading method, if it used, > then only headers files required during building binaries. The feature would be removed from the non-free list if the library sources are published under a (GPL-compatible) open-source so

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Maksym Veremeyenko
14.02.2018 14:45, Hendrik Leppkes пише: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Schwarz wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: 2018-02-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: 2018-02-14 12:21 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz :

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Nicolas George
Tomas Härdin (2018-02-14): > Devs that work on companies that need > the proprietary stuff that is. It's always a tradeoff. Devs that work on companies that need the proprietary stuff could make use of the weight of said companies to get the proprietary stuff r

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Tomas Härdin
On 2018-02-14 15:16, Nicolas George wrote: Tomas Härdin (2018-02-14): Oh yeah, that puts a damper on things. The only way around that is dlopen() or RPC, neither of which is going to make it into FFmpeg At some point, vendors will need to realize we chose a copyleft license to forthe them to pl

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Nicolas George
Tomas Härdin (2018-02-14): > Oh yeah, that puts a damper on things. The only way around that is dlopen() > or RPC, neither of which is going to make it into FFmpeg At some point, vendors will need to realize we chose a copyleft license to forthe them to play nice, not to put extra burdens on devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Tomas Härdin
On 2018-02-14 14:48, Ricardo Constantino wrote: On 14 February 2018 at 12:56, Tomas Härdin wrote: On 2018-02-14 13:50, Kyle Schwarz wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Schwarz wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Carl

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Ricardo Constantino
On 14 February 2018 at 12:56, Tomas Härdin wrote: > On 2018-02-14 13:50, Kyle Schwarz wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Schwarz wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2018-02-14 13:50 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Schwarz wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos >>> wrote: 2018-02-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Tomas Härdin
On 2018-02-14 13:50, Kyle Schwarz wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Schwarz wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: 2018-02-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Carl Eug

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Kyle Schwarz
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Schwarz wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>> 2018-02-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2018

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Schwarz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2018-02-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos >>> wrote: 2018-02-14 12:21 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : Sorry, I wasn't immed

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Kyle Schwarz
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2018-02-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>> 2018-02-14 12:21 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : >>> Sorry, I wasn't immediately able to find the sources for the >>> ndi library: Please p

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2018-02-14 13:12 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2018-02-14 12:21 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : >> Sorry, I wasn't immediately able to find the sources for the >> ndi library: Please post a link. > > The only official way I know to get the SDK is b

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Kyle Schwarz
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > 2018-02-14 12:21 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : > Sorry, I wasn't immediately able to find the sources for the > ndi library: Please post a link. The only official way I know to get the SDK is by providing them with an email when selecting "Dow

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2018-02-14 12:21 GMT+01:00 Kyle Schwarz : > The NewTek SDK headers are MIT licensed, so FFmpeg > shouldn't need to be nonfree to include this library. Sorry, I wasn't immediately able to find the sources for the ndi library: Please post a link. Carl Eugen _

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Change license required for NewTek SDK

2018-02-14 Thread Kyle Schwarz
The NewTek SDK headers are MIT licensed, so FFmpeg shouldn't need to be nonfree to include this library. --- configure | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure b/configure index 99c53d482a..f3a0bbafa6 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -1569,7 +1569,6 @@