Hi,
>> I'm not sure what you are referring to, what's there to spread fud about??
>
> Closely read your text that you removed out.
You're reading into it too much if it provoked fear or uncertainty in your
mind, wasn't my intention.
>> What is, AME or one of the prores encoders included in
la part de Paul B
Mahol
Envoyé : mercredi 2 septembre 2020 18:54
À : FFmpeg user questions
Objet : Re: [FFmpeg-user] ? About ffmpeg's prores implemention
On 9/2/20, Philippe Laterrade wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> You're right.
> It's just, I didn't find anything relevant to really adjust th
> -Message d'origine-
> De : ffmpeg-user [mailto:ffmpeg-user-boun...@ffmpeg.org] De la part de Paul
> B Mahol
> Envoyé : mercredi 2 septembre 2020 18:08
> À : FFmpeg user questions
> Objet : Re: [FFmpeg-user] ? About ffmpeg's prores implemention
>
> On 9/2/20, Philippe
Mahol
Envoyé : mercredi 2 septembre 2020 18:08
À : FFmpeg user questions
Objet : Re: [FFmpeg-user] ? About ffmpeg's prores implemention
On 9/2/20, Philippe Laterrade wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> I made some tests very recently with several qcsale value, but never reached
> exactly the bi
On 9/2/20, Philippe Laterrade wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> I made some tests very recently with several qcsale value, but never reached
> exactly the bit rate specs announced by Apple. Did anyone has already
> success to get those specs?
Next time specify what you actually tried.
qscale is not for
On 8/31/20, Edward Park wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Again just typical FUD from same person.
>
> I'm not sure what you are referring to, what's there to spread fud about??
Closely read your text that you removed out.
>
>> It is obviously slower, hahaha.
>
>
> What is, AME or one of the prores encoders
la part de Valentin
Schweitzer
Envoyé : mercredi 2 septembre 2020 17:29
À : ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
Objet : Re: [FFmpeg-user] ? About ffmpeg's prores implemention
On 31/08/2020 10:41, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> I honestly can't remember most of what that does but the number af
On 31/08/2020 10:41, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> I honestly can't remember most of what that does but the number after
> "-qscale:v" controls overall bitrate from 1 to 31. Reducing it increases
> bitrate (obviously!) and if you set it very low, it may create files that are
> wildly
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 08:41:27AM +, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, 30 August 2020, 23:21:16 BST, Edward Park
> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you are referring to, what's there to spread fud about??
> I'm not sure what he's referring to, either, but just be
On Sunday, 30 August 2020, 23:21:16 BST, Edward Park
wrote:
> I'm not sure what you are referring to, what's there to spread fud about??
I'm not sure what he's referring to, either, but just be aware you're talking
mainly to software engineers here and they have a well-deserved
Hi,
> Again just typical FUD from same person.
I'm not sure what you are referring to, what's there to spread fud about??
> It is obviously slower, hahaha.
What is, AME or one of the prores encoders included in FFmpeg? I mean obviously
it'd depend on the job and hardware but for what it's
On 8/30/20, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am Fr., 28. Aug. 2020 um 02:01 Uhr schrieb Gary Yost :
>>
>> ’ve got a question about the Prores implementation in ffmpeg because I’ve
>> seen
>> some odd behavior here with FCPX (running on a very beefy 16-core Mac Pro
>> with 192Gram and an Afterburner
Am Fr., 28. Aug. 2020 um 02:01 Uhr schrieb Gary Yost :
>
> ’ve got a question about the Prores implementation in ffmpeg because I’ve seen
> some odd behavior here with FCPX (running on a very beefy 16-core Mac Pro
> with 192Gram and an Afterburner card).
>
> When I output files from ffmpeg in
On 8/30/20, Edward Park wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> After more research, I’ve found that the two other encoders that I have
>> which write Prores create files that Afterburner recognizes as Prores and
>> plays them in real time. Unfortunately ffmpeg’s Prores isn’t recognized
>> as such by the Mac and I’ll
Hi,
> After more research, I’ve found that the two other encoders that I have which
> write Prores create files that Afterburner recognizes as Prores and plays
> them in real time. Unfortunately ffmpeg’s Prores isn’t recognized as such by
> the Mac and I’ll have to switch to AME for this
After more research, I’ve found that the two other encoders that I have which
write Prores create files that Afterburner recognizes as Prores and plays them
in real time. Unfortunately ffmpeg’s Prores isn’t recognized as such by the
Mac and I’ll have to switch to AME for this going forward.
On Friday, 28 August 2020, 09:34:48 BST, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
>http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=history;f=libavcodec/proresdata.h;hb=HEAD
>
>http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=history;f=libavcodec/proresdata.c;hb=HEAD
>
On 8/28/20, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
>
> The ProRes implementation is not likely to be perfect in terms of Apple's
> internal spec. They do not publish the spec so we don't know. In general, it
> has been shown to be reasonably reliable when used with most software
> decoders. It has
The ProRes implementation is not likely to be perfect in terms of Apple's
internal spec. They do not publish the spec so we don't know. In general, it
has been shown to be reasonably reliable when used with most software decoders.
It has had problems in the past (I haven't checked for years)
Hi,
ProRes is proprietary, Apple actually calls FFmpeg out on having an unlicensed
implementation:
> Using any unauthorized implementation (like the FFmpeg and derivative
> implementations) may lead to decoding errors, performance degradation,
> incompatibility, and instability.
But you
Thanks Paul. I’ll do more testing tomorrow and will get back to you with
further data.
> On Aug 27, 2020, at 5:14 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> On 8/28/20, Gary Yost mailto:g...@yostopia.com>> wrote:
>> ’ve got a question about the Prores implementation in ffmpeg because I’ve
>> seen some odd
On 8/28/20, Gary Yost wrote:
> ’ve got a question about the Prores implementation in ffmpeg because I’ve
> seen some odd behavior here with FCPX (running on a very beefy 16-core Mac
> Pro with 192Gram and an Afterburner card).
>
> When I output files from ffmpeg in ProresLT format and bring them
’ve got a question about the Prores implementation in ffmpeg because I’ve seen
some odd behavior here with FCPX (running on a very beefy 16-core Mac Pro with
192Gram and an Afterburner card).
When I output files from ffmpeg in ProresLT format and bring them into FCPX,
they stutter badly…
23 matches
Mail list logo
