On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 13:43:55 -0600
Rick Keniuk wrote:
> When watching 4:3 aspect and you don't want stuff missing. Thats a good
> reason for the black bars.
I mean when displaying video in a window, not fullscreen. Of course you would
want the bars in fullscreen mode, or if maximized. I don't
Is there an option which fixes the ffplay window to the video dimension when
resizing? I really don't understand why anyone would desire the default
behavior of scaling the video to fit the smallest dimension, leaving black bars
on either side. Thanks.
--
Dave Blanchard
for the ffmpeg list.
That's OK. There are certain readers out there who are glad we did veer off
topic for a moment.
Later down the road, you WILL become much more familiar with the facts and
dangers I've warned about. The only question is WHEN you will learn these
> Could you please just stop the conversation here. It is time consuming...
I already did. You can, also, if you'd like.
--
Dave Blanchard
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-u
On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 04:56:46 +0100
Robin van der Linden via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> Second, the solution Dave suggested in his previous post, please correct
> me if I'm wrong Dave, but I guess he is referring to:
> https://github.com/kaltura/nginx-vod-module . This solution is fine if
> you
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 20:38:51 +0100
Robin van der Linden via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ffmpeg can do this, at least some parts. It will create the segments and a
> master.m3u8 file for each track by itself. Still you will need to create
> master.m3u8 File wich references all the tracks
uential people's sons and daughters.
To understand the times we are living in better, consult 1984, Brave New World,
Animal Farm, Atlas Shrugged, etc. And then the Bible. And then pray.
And stop watching TV, or believing anything you read anywhere, especially on
the internet.
--
Dave Blanchard
> can somebody explain why fmp4 currently does randomly break on seek and/or
> quality change using VideoJS and other players, while mpegts works 100% fine?
I don't know that it's a FFmpeg problem, or just a problem with other streaming
formats than MPEG2. I also find that MPEG2-TS works most
> I tried to find some more information onto this, but I'm not sure if
> this might be the issue:
>
> https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/?series=1018
>
> Is somebody able to provide some more information onto these issues? Why
> aren't these changes already merged? Can I do this
as "Linux Puttering" aka Linus
Poettering. That would be systemd, and of course the original O.G. Puttering
junkware, pulseaudio. There is a master plan at work here, and a sinister one
at that.
You have my sympathy in resolving this problem, as I know the pain all too well.
Dave
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:37:28 +0100 (CET)
l...@netc.fr wrote:
> Does the second command look right?
I think you should use either .mpg or .mkv format instead for mpeg2 video, but
not sure if it would cause this problem.
Dave
___
ffmpeg-user mailing
On 11/8/2022 2:50 PM, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> I can't believe you dropped ffserver. [...]
> Perhaps it's because other projects were eclipsing ffserver, only the
> developers know for sure.
So how about we just wait for one of them to comment, instead of wasting time
with sp
ream MJPEG off my capture
card, transcode/filter to MPEG, then stream to HTTP.
--
Dave Blanchard
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:16:03 -0500
From: Clay
To: FFmpeg user questions , Nicolas George
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffserver
Nicolas George wrote on 11/9/22 03:18:
> I hope you do not expect getting help with that kind of attitude.
Let's be clear: I DID NOT COME HERE for what you call
in advance.
--
Dave Blanchard
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:23:18 -0800
Patrick Cusack via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> Please include your command that you use for conversion as well as all the
> output.
And how would that help this situation in any way?
Thanks to Carl for actually answering the question.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 19:45:56 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> but to be honest: a subject like "FW: New user question" implies common
> sense isn't present
>
> with common sense the subject would have been "Unknown encoder 'hap'"
Free clue: there is no such thing as "common sense." Not everyone
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 14:41:46 -0800
amindfv--- via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> Ironically the single reason this thread has devolved into personal attacks
> and irrelevance to the original question is your own contributions.
"The single reason"? So I'm control of the keyboard of all participants in
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 23:39:59 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> a working brain is a enough to put the question into the subject instead
> "New user question" and has nothing to do with a mailing list at all
Please, tell us more about how the OP is too stupid to participate in this
mailing list,
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 22:10:45 +0100 (CET)
Marton Balint wrote:
> The 3/1001 v.s. 30 fps seems like a good guess based on the 21 second
> difference. E.g. the camera reports 30 fps when it in fact runs at 29.97.
>
> I'd check what is detected, and what is written to the output file as
>
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:07:32 +
Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> On 2/3/2023 9:22 AM, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> > And how would that help this situation in any way?
> In this one particular case, maybe not, but we don't necessary know.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that we do.
> So, why include
It's spelled "HOLE." IDIOT.
If you "had a brain" you'd have known that. Right? Anyone with "common sense"
should have known that "HOLE" is not the same word as "WHOLE." Furthermore your
punctuation and grammar also leaves much to be desired.
And you actually have the balls to trash talk the
Thanks, Carl! I'm sure there's somebody out there, probably some "idiot" noob,
who "can't click a link", who will greatly appreciate your link.
Although he may be confused as to what to do with it, since after all, he
*can't click a link.*
Dave
___
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 14:54:40 -0800
Patrick Cusack via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> The guy posted an open ended question without any context. And yes having the
> command makes a difference.
NO, IT DID NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE, AND COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY MADE ANY
DIFFERENCE WHATSOEVER in this case.
Is this supposed to be some kind of veiled threat?
I wonder what would happen if this person whom you are "targeting" were to
report your threat to your local police. Is cyber-crime welcomed and encouraged
in your jurisdiction? Do you believe your identity could not be discovered, by
some
In case anyone else runs into a similar problem, this appears to be due to my
shitty video capture card. It's a Bluecherry brand card, which were
discontinued years ago and I can see why; it's subpar in various ways,
including this frame rate problem.
I tried using the videorate plugin on my
Fuck off, loser.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
27 matches
Mail list logo
