On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:49:16 -0500, you wrote:
I own a 1270, the predecessor to the 1280,
What changed in the 1280? Should one consider a 1270, if a good deal
comes along?
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
for a
4000 dpi scanner, but would welcome comments.
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 09:57:12 -0600, you wrote:
For those instances, I poise my left hand over the space bar as I work...if
I can't find the darn cursor, I press the space bar and there is a nice big
fat Hand. Move the cursor (hand) to its target and proceed. Takes some
getting used to, but
Sorry for the boring questions here, but I just installed a new
version of Photoshop (6), and I have a couple of really dumb
questions:
1) This may be actually a Windows question, I'm running ME, but is
there a way to change the default view of a folder when you go to
Open? PS is defaulting to
'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
Unsubscribe by mail
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:39:32 -0500, you wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:39:48 -0800, Ken Durling wrote:
I'm about to throw out my Epson Photo Stylus 820.
So, what's your usage profile? I've printed over a hundred 8 x 10
photos with my 820 and only one head clog. That was when I left
, if you hit About Vuescan you get a window at the bottom
which is a serial number - is that not it?
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
at:
www.hamrick.com.
It's updated very frequently, almost weekly, so keep checking.
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
Unsubscribe
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 21:50:27 -0700, you wrote:
And I think Vuescan is the cat's meow.
Can we have a three-week, 80-e-mail, discussion of whether you are right
or I am? Can I write long diatribes on the difference between the cat's
whiskers and the cat's meow? Please?
Well, if this was an audio
difference this higher
res makes, and in what circumstances it's most noticeable.
I'd also like batch scanning, but that's a seperate question.
Thanks for your time.
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:33:15 -0400, you wrote:
What on earth are you talking about? Where do you set the DPI of the scan?
I'm not Anthony, but on every piece of scanning software I've owned -
all three of them! ;-) (HP, CanoScan and Vuescan) Even Vuescan
calls it dpi. I'm aware, from
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:35:02 -0400, you wrote:
I understand. The comment was specifically about saving the file...and you
don't save dots, you save pixels. The file, according to PS, is N pixels in
width, by M pixels in height.
After you scan, what does Viewscan show for units? How about
this...he's gotten quite busy these days, so I won't hold
my breath...
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:35:45 -0700, you wrote:
But Ken, you've missed the whole point of that posting... it is because
this poster's purpose for living is to correct all the minutia(e) that
doesn't conform with his reality. With that in mind, you'll certainly
now understand the full value of
Sorry - but are you guys referring to the Monitor Color Space pull
down under the Color tab in Vuescan? I can't find anything that is
labeled Monitor Profile. Am I missing it?
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:31:27 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:01:00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:01:49 -0700, you wrote:
That is to say without image inversion (neg-to-positive)?
Would Device-Media type-Image work for this?
From the help file:
[For] Image, no film correction is used, and the cropped
file will look as much like the original image as possible.
If
/viewphoto.php?id=29447
But I'd like to understand more and get better results.
Thanks for all the explanations!
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
effect on jpegs as opposed to
TIFFs?
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
, over the raw
intitial file.
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 11:33:05 -0500, you wrote:
Probably the artifacts created in the compression process. It would
probably be better to convert to JPG first and then sharpen.
But when printing it's best to go direct from the TIFF isn't it? This
is where I run into it. When producing for the
capabilities (FS2710) , I'm very happy
with the workflow of TIFFresize/resample sharpencompress.
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
already told my friend to look at samples.
Ken
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
Ken
? Or hold a slide in for that matter?
I'm not exactly sure of the size of the cutouts, whether it was 2x2
for slides or 2 1/4 x 2 1/4 for MF. The cutouts didn't have a lip to
hold a the mounted slide in postion, nor did they look they were set
up for a snap fit.
Any illucidation welcome, thanks.
Ken
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:17:50 -0500, you wrote:
Hello!
On their site, and in their literature, Kodak extols the virtues of
Supra for scanning. Does anyone have experience with this film? I like
Fuji Superia a lot, but I do get some grain aliasing problems with the
400 ISO, and VueScan doesn't
, so I
thought I'd ask. I have an HP Scanjet 5200C. Is there any hope?
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/browse.php?id=photographer:203
Unsubscribe
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 20:43:32 -0800, you wrote:
Most people didn't like the results, but again there is a web site
(ditto on where it is) that shows you how to make one.
Use a good search engine and look up something like slide film adapter
for flatbed don't expect miracles in terms of the
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:28 + (GMT), you wrote:
It arises purely out of the filtration used by the lab for C41 printing,
and is not a property of the film itself, just a workaround for the fact
that it's difficult to get a neutral greyscale print on colour paper with
this film.
Thanks,
?
Thanks as always
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 19:10:13 -0500, you wrote:
Hi Ken,
Sorry, I don't know what you mean by upper and lower histogram. I only get
one histogram in my version of PS, but perhaps I don't know how to drive it
well enough to get more!
Regards,
Austin
One more question: I understand (I think)
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:07:14 -0800, you wrote:
I apologize if I'm getting into some else's discussion, but I suggest the
following:
No apology necessary! All input is welcome. And thanks everyone -
this is going to push me into a new sector of the learning curve with
PS Elements, as I've
HI all -
I have not been able to get on Adobe's website for about a month. My
connection invariably times out, and I have DSL. Anyone else having
this experience The same thing happens whether I use www.adobe.com
or the Adobe Online link in PS Elements. Any ideas?
Ken
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:08:16 -0500, you wrote:
I just tried it now and it worked okay...
Thanks everybody - guess I'll see if my ISP can help.
Ken
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with
on the effectiveness of the black and
white point settings?
Thanks for any lights, and if seeing an example of this particular
scan would be helpful, I can supply.
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 05:31:15 EST, you wrote:
Leave the black point (%) set at 0, and set white point (%)
to 1.
Then experiment primarily with the Color|Brightness
option. This applies effectively a gamma curve, bringing
more detail out of dark areas without saturating bright
areas.
Thank you,
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 05:31:15 EST, you wrote:
Leave the black point (%) set at 0, and set white point (%)
to 1.
Then experiment primarily with the Color|Brightness
option. This applies effectively a gamma curve, bringing
more detail out of dark areas without saturating bright
areas.
This is
close!
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe
on the effectiveness of the black and
white point settings?
Thanks for any lights, and if seeing an example of this particular
scan would be helpful, I can supply.
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
missing some basic concepts here, so
thanks for your patience.
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Why is it called a histogram? I understand histo- to be a
combining form meaning organic tissue as in histography and
histogeny, but what does it mean in this context?
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
posts are about when it says
Re: filmscanners Re: filmscanners Re: filmscanners
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
on Minolta Scan Multi
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
Hey, that's nice. Good going!
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
/2001, you wrote:
As I explained on the telephone, the alleged debt that your letter refers
to involves.
Thanks yes. It was caught by my firewall.
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:19:25 -0500 , you wrote:
It turns out that Lacie's aren't as expensive as I though so I'm going to
look at one of those. NEC is also now made by Mitsubishi so I'll be looking
at those as well.
Never heard of Lacies. Where can I read about them?
Ken Durling
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001 22:11:59 -0500, you wrote:
Actually, LaCie has been around since the beginning of time
I think I missed that event. :-o
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Someone mentioned Viewsonic so although I really haven't intensively
compared it with others, I've been very happy with my A90 since I
bought it - almost a year ago now. I'm sure it's been superceded, but
its a sharp, clear and bright monitor that I can hold a print up next
to a display of the
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:55:47 -0500, you wrote:
I have about 30 or so different varieties planted on my side hill. I think I
have that variety.
Hey, if you can identify the variety from the shot, that's probably
good enough color for me! ;-)
Ken
, light,
and location. NPH film, scanned on LS-30 using vuescan then levels tuned in
photoshop.
Couldn't find it in your galleries - is it there?
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
FD 100/2.8. Scanned
on a FS 2710, with a touch of USM. 140%, 1.2 pixels, IIRC.
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
. Of course, with Day Lilies, that's like
comparing the colors of people's eyes but they do sort themselves
into distinct strains, with characteristic colors.
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Thanks for all the great help. This is what I finally came up with.
Wondering if you think the colors look natural. These _are_ pretty
creatures.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=455020size=lg
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 23:59:45 +1100, you wrote:
Ken Durling wrote:
Hi folks -
I have two questions. One is I'm having a very hard time scanning
Superia 400, and there's no setting for it in Vuescan. Colors are
coming out all wrong even on the scan, and it's very hard to even know
where
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:06:01 , you wrote:
Photo Retouch Pro
Try this fantastic software from Binuscan .
I have used it with my scan pictures and pictures from my D1X
At $1000, it BETTER be good!is it Mac only?
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:38:56 +1300, you wrote:
Ken Durling wrote:
I have two questions. One is I'm having a very hard time scanning
Superia 400, and there's no setting for it in Vuescan.
General consensus is to use Reala 100 (Japan), I believe. That choice gives me the
most accurate colour
Very strange. I've tried everybody's suggestions, scanning under SGH,
NGH, Real 100 (Japan) even Royal Gold 400, but a shot I have of a
blood-red DayLily keeps coming out deep purple. Any ideas?
Ken
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:35:41 +1000, you wrote:
Ken Durling wrote:
Tried NHG, and it was way off. Haven't tried SHG, and I don't know
why not! Will do and report.
I don't know if you've tried this, but have a go at Generic Colour Negative
and Neutral instead of White Balance.
Rob
Thanks Rob
with Levels to neutralise the image?
Rob
This sounds interesting - but I'm afraid I dont' fully understand the
notion. Would you mind explaining a little further?
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Folks -
Your suggestions are helping. Generic and Neutral color balance
are getting me closer to at least the right hues, although the
saturation is still way off. Tweaking the brightness levels of the
reds and blues in the scan are helping too. I think it's to the
point where I can
everything in sRGB.
What are my next steps towards getting really good control over my
camera to print workflow?
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Arthur -
Thank you very much for a considered explanation. I'm studying it!
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
better shadow silence,
batch scanning, and some kind of ICE?
I have on emore question, but I'll post it seperately.
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
that are,
obviously, 1/5 inch in size. My question is, what does this say about
print resolution? The printer is obviously using a certain number of
dots to produce one pixel. Is this number of dots specified simply by
selecting the print resolution in the printer driver menu?
Thanks
Ken Durling
Photo.net
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:54:46 -0500, you wrote:
Ken Durling [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
My question is, what does this say about print resolution? The printer
is obviously using a certain number of dots to produce one pixel. Is
this number of dots specified simply by selecting the print resolution
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 11:02:32 -0600, you wrote:
It's the plus sign after the number that saves the scans sequentially and prevents
accidental overwrites.
Thanks, Maris. Vuescan advances the numerical value automatically?
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 12:08:34 -0600, you wrote:
As long as the plus sign is present, yes it does.
If the plus sign is not present it will overwrite. Don't ask me why - it's Ed's way
of doing it. :-)
Super! Thanks Maris.
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 12:49:25 -0500, you wrote:
The tech person said Press and Superia are exactly the same
film,
Aha! I am vindicated! (not here, with someone else) And to think I
spent a few rolls of each just trying to tell the difference.
Needless to say, I couldn't.
So, the obvious
what I'm looking for.
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
I'm going to read Wayne Fulton ro get clear on the difference between
sharpen and unsharp mask, but PSP 7 has an adjsutment called
Clarify which looks sort of like a combination of contrast and
sharpness adjustment. Anyone know exactly what it does?
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http
HI folks -
I can't seem to find the e-mail address and subscription instructions
for this list - I have someone who wants to sign up. Could some kind
soul shoot them to me?
Thanks!
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001 23:29:08 -0600, you wrote:
Go to Tony Sleep's website and sign up there:
http://www.halftone.co.uk/
Maris
Ah yes. Thanks, Maris. Mind went blank!
Ken
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001 23:29:08 -0600, you wrote:
Go to Tony Sleep's website and sign up there:
http://www.halftone.co.uk/
P.S. I couldn't resist, told my friend he could sign up by going to
sleep!
Oh, you've heard that one before . . . never min . .
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio
What is the dynamic range figure - i.e.3.2, 3.4 or whatever - a
measurement of? Or maybe I should ask, what is the unit of
measurement?
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Thanks folks- excellent answers. Plus I have ordered and am waiting
for a hard copy of Wayne Fulton's tips. For some reason I can stare
at a screen for hours editing photos (or music) , but when it comes to
reading words I fade in 10 minutes!
Ken
the existing version on my computer? Or do I DL and
replace with same reg#?
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:50:26 -0600, you wrote:
Just delete the folder with the previous version and install the new - your
registration will remain automatically.
Maris
Thanks all - done.
Ken Durling
Photo.net portfolio:
http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
I see you folks recommending these other Epsons a lot, that aren't
advertised with the six color photo printing.Is there any real
advantage to going with something like the 890 or 1280 over one of
the less expensive office color inkjets?
I'm using a HP 722C right now, and I actually get
The Vuescan Fuji neg options don't include one for Superia 400, which
I've shot a lot of. Any idea which of the existing ones match it the
best?
Ken
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001 12:14:28 +0530, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Question about Vuescan
It's not auto-detect, but it has 16 (more than a few) Kodak
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001 10:46:54 -0600, you wrote:
As I remember it, Ed Hamrick (creator of Vuescan) has said that if you use
one of the slide settings, the program will attempt to make the scan look
like the original scene by applying the profile to make corrections. If you
use the Image
Hi folks -
Continuing to experiment, scan and learn here. Enjoying Vuescan - but
the documentation states that the program supports some 200-odd types
of film, while the Color dialogue only gives a few Kodak films, and
then GENERIC.Am I missing something? Is it auto detect?
Ken Durling
Whoa. How did you do that? Up til now, when I did that it only gave
me KODAK and GENERIC. Now it is as you say. You have strange powers,
Maris! Anyway, thanks!! :-)
Ken
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 20:53:10 -0700, you wrote:
with HP Photosmart
with my 5200C.
I meant HP PrecisionScan - I've never owned a Photosmart!
Ken
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:12:10 +1000, you wrote:
I try to keep my jpeg files inside 50K for general web use. You can
make quite reasonably sized images on the screen that as a file are inside
that limit. Waiting for larger files to download gets boring, and people on
the web tend to have short
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:12:10 +1000, you wrote:
If you're making web images, the dpi for the screen is 72dpi. End of story.
Right, but scan at 72 dpi and you get crap. One day I'll understand
all this. ;-)
Ken
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:39:14 -0700, you wrote:
Right, but scan at 72 dpi and you get crap. One day I'll understand
all this. ;-)
Hold on - thanks to you all, maybe I DO understand this. If scanned
at 72 dpi, even a 4x6 print would need quite a bit of interpolation to
get it up to a good
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:49:22 -0400, you wrote:
Hold on - thanks to you all, maybe I DO understand this. If scanned
at 72 dpi, even a 4x6 print would need quite a bit of interpolation to
get it up to a good screen size, ergo crap.Is that correct?
No, not interpolation. Interpolation
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:08:40 -0400, you wrote:
I guess I'm missing the point here. If I were to scan even a 4x6
print at 72 dpi, and then want to display it anything larger than
288x432 pixels, wouldn't interpolation be necessary? Even more with a
slide or a negative?
But you wouldn't
into a
discussion of the bit question there yet, but if it's there I will!
thanks kindly
Ken Durling
Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 22:15:16 -0700, I wrote:
For example, Photo House offers a
choice of Interchange Format (JPEG/JFIF) ;
Oops, left out the other choice, which I just noticed, which is TIFF
JPEG (JTIF). Is that something like the TIFF LZ compression you have
been mentioning? When might I
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 01:05:24 -0400, you wrote:
That is a case where you certainly can try it. I would suggest trying both
methods, and see which works better for you. Some scanners do a fantastic
job at giving you great scans at reduced DPI, and others are quite bad.
Only through a test of
89 matches
Mail list logo
