Hi Hiro,
I'll do this the next time it starts to choke up, and I'll send you
the report.
I don't have that Shark thing you mentioned in the next email, and
that is getting out of my experience, but if you will "walk me
through" some of this stuff when you have a free moment, I'll try to
I wrote:
>There is another way.
Ooops. My finger slipped and it went out before finishing the
sentence. Sorry!
The other and more practical way is to run Shark against GPO if you have
DevTool installed. I will see what I find when I get my hands on my
copy of GPO :-)
Tho I am so behind my w
Chuck Israels / 2005/06/12 / 09:32 PM wrote:
>Worked w/Finale & GPO all day - no Formac TV, and a few minutes ago
>(about 6:30 PM), GPO choked up again. The Activity Monitor was
>showing that it was back to using 70% + of the CPU.
Chuck,
Next time, in Activity Monitor, highlight GPO which is
End of day report:
Worked w/Finale & GPO all day - no Formac TV, and a few minutes ago
(about 6:30 PM), GPO choked up again. The Activity Monitor was
showing that it was back to using 70% + of the CPU.
Quit & restart GPO - redo MIDI in Finale (only takes a couple of
minutes) and again, a
Thanks Karen. I'll check that out as well.
***
J.D. Thomas
ThomaStudios
West Linn OR
www.thomastudios.com
***
On Jun 12, 2005, at 5:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi J.D.,
There is another nice word processor program called Mariner Write th
Hi J.D.,
There is another nice word processor program called Mariner Write
that a lot of people seem to like. It works in Tiger too and you can
download it and try it first. It will read Word documents and save
to RTF-Word files. It runs about $50.00-60.00 depending on whether
you buy a bo
PS If you do a lot of file sharing, I suppose the one area not being
up-to-date that could be an issue is the converters. But if it's mostly
in-house I wouldn't worry. You can always use text files.
Ken
At 04:50 PM 6/12/2005, you wrote:
WP updates have not been all that significant to the
WP updates have not been all that significant to the word processor
segment. Most of it has been bells and whistle, spreadsheets, and web
features that personally I never use. I used WP 5.1 for years, and then got
WpWin 8 and have been using that for a long time. There were some minor
layout
Have you done the usual things, such as Repair Disk Permissions, and
seen if there are any updates to Word that you should install?
John Howell wrote:
Our computers came with MS Office preloaded, so most of us use MS
Word. (The university upgrades us about every 4 years.) The version
I now
At 1:15 PM -0700 6/12/05, ThomaStudios wrote:
Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board.
What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS
X. I would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which
steadfastly refuses to create a printer on my system
I wasn't the one looking, but it does run under OS 9 Classic, but it's
really not worth the effort. One could get Pages, or even a copy of
Office for OS X, or even Appleworks
I don't think Wordperfect for the Mac has been updated in 5 or more
years. The last release was 3.5 I believe, and it h
Well, that too.
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Also because it's a dead end -- no longer supported or updated.
- Darcy
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On 12 Jun 2005 at 16:09, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> >If it runs on OS X, why would that be a problem?
> >
> >I use Word97, myself, even though I could be running Word2K or
> >Word2K2, of which I have legal copies. Word97 is sufficient for my
> >needs.
> >
> >If the 3-yea
Also because it's a dead end -- no longer supported or updated.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 12 Jun 2005, at 7:09 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Cause it doesn't run under OS X, it runs under OS 9.
David W. Fenton wrote:
If it runs on OS X, why would that be a problem?
I use
Cause it doesn't run under OS X, it runs under OS 9.
David W. Fenton wrote:
If it runs on OS X, why would that be a problem?
I use Word97, myself, even though I could be running Word2K or
Word2K2, of which I have legal copies. Word97 is sufficient for my
needs.
If the 3-year-old WordPerfec
On 12 Jun 2005 at 15:39, ThomaStudios wrote:
> I did some superficial research on this, and about I could find out
> was that they haven't updated anything for the Mac in about 3 years or
> so.
If it runs on OS X, why would that be a problem?
I use Word97, myself, even though I could be running
As you probably gathered, WordPerfect for Mac was discontinued ages ago.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 12 Jun 2005, at 6:39 PM, ThomaStudios wrote:
I did some superficial research on this, and about I could find out
was that they haven't updated anything for the Mac in about
I did some superficial research on this, and about I could find out was
that they haven't updated anything for the Mac in about 3 years or so.
***
J.D. Thomas
ThomaStudios
West Linn OR
www.thomastudios.com
***
On Jun 12, 2005, at 2:33 PM, dhbai
ThomaStudios wrote:
Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board.
What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS X. I
would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which steadfastly
refuses to create a printer on my system. All the other Office
Thanks Darcy (and the others who chimed in). I actually didn't know
about Pages, but will check it out. You also brought up InDesign,
which I own vCS2. I didn't even give that a thought. Ah, there's hope
for me yet!
Thanks again to all who responded.
J.D. Thomas
ThomaStudios
On Jun 12, 2005, at 4:15 PM, ThomaStudios wrote:
Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board.
What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS X.
I would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which steadfastly
refuses to create a printer on my s
Hi Bernard et al-
Bernard wrote: > So Special Part Extract serves as a preview of the look my
parts will
> have once I do a real extract.
what a cool idea, Bernard! This may be just the ticket.
Thanks to everyone for their reminders about doing whatever I do on
duplicate a file. That's something
Pages is great, and inexpensive, but it definitely takes some getting
used to. It helps if you're familiar with InDesign, Quark, etc, since
Pages is actually more of a baby desktop publishing app than a
traditional word processor.
It's especially good for mixing text and images.
- Darcy
-
Pages, part of iWork. Great word processing program.
ThomaStudios wrote:
Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board.
What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS X.
I would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which steadfastly
refuses to
Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board.
What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS X.
I would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which steadfastly
refuses to create a printer on my system. All the other Office
components will print,
Hi Karen, Darcy, Hiro et al,
It seems you guys are likely to be right!
GPO has been running overnight - without the Formac TV, and it and my
Mac have remained stable, with the GPO usage remaining at about 16%
in the activity monitor. So all those background crashes of the
Formac software
My problem with GPO is the Kontact engine. It doesn't load many
instruments before the sound cracks up on a Mac. I find Reason to be
much more efficient. Mind you, Reason doesn't have those nice
Keyboard Switches that GPO has where you can change samples (e.g.,
arco to pizz to trem. etc.) withi
I basically use special part extract to prepare a general format before
I go to extract the final versions of the parts. Of course I don't do
this with my original score file but with a duplicate of it. In the
Special Part Extract I can see and adjust any items which may need to
be changed, suc
and there is going to be a Tiger update soon, according to
an email I received from Gary a few days ago.
Hi Chuck,
Thank you for your kind words...and thank you for the information
that the Tiger update is on its way soon. That is good to know and
will hopefully clear up some of th
29 matches
Mail list logo
