Re: [Finale] OT: MP3 Compression Comparison

2005-09-27 Thread A-NO-NE Music
David W. Fenton / 2005/09/26 / 05:40 PM wrote: >On 26 Sep 2005 at 14:29, Christopher Smith wrote: >> . . . All there would be >> left to do is to compare them with the original (presumably >> sixteen-bit digital.) I would suppose that the maximum of about 3 dB >> differences in the mid-range wouldn

Re: [Finale] Re: Secondary Beam Breaks

2005-09-27 Thread David W. Fenton
On 27 Sep 2005 at 17:38, Mark D Lew wrote: > On Sep 26, 2005, at 12:18 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: > > > Well, that's exactly the kind of fussiness I'm trying to avoid -- > > it's the way I've done these things in the past on a larger scale, > > and now I want a simpler method. > > I think we all

Re: [Finale] Re: Secondary Beam Breaks

2005-09-27 Thread Mark D Lew
On Sep 26, 2005, at 12:18 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Well, that's exactly the kind of fussiness I'm trying to avoid -- it's the way I've done these things in the past on a larger scale, and now I want a simpler method. I think we all agree that there's no good way to do this, but there are se

RE: [Finale] OT: MP3 Compression Comparison

2005-09-27 Thread David W. Fenton
On 27 Sep 2005 at 22:13, Kurt Gnos wrote: > Ok. I should not have said that, I should have added "easily" or > something like that. . . . Well, "easily" is in the eye of the beholder. To me, setting pan and so forth is simple in Finale, as it works just the same as any other expression. Given t

RE: [Finale] OT: MP3 Compression Comparison

2005-09-27 Thread Kurt Gnos
David, Ok. I should not have said that, I should have added "easily" or something like that. By the way, I just had a look at your side and must say it's very interesting. And it's very nice you can see the graphics and download the midi. I got a roland sound canvas about twelve years ago. I

RE: [Finale] OT: MP3 Compression Comparison

2005-09-27 Thread David W. Fenton
On 27 Sep 2005 at 20:03, Kurt Gnos wrote: > At 00:40 27.09.2005, you wrote: > >If you truly think that you can't set pan and reverb in Finale, then > >it suggests to me that your statements about Finale's inadequacy for > >tweaking a performance are not very credible, because you clearly > >don't

[Finale] FIN/MAC 2006 and GPO Studio questions

2005-09-27 Thread Gerald Berg
Well I got Finale 2006 and got it running with Finale GPO but dang if it don't sound different from my GPO STUDIO set (I'm running the piano duo sounds). I notice I have to register this new Finale GPO too. So... 1) Is there a way to run my 'old' GPO Studio with FIN 2006? 2) Do I really have t

Re: [Finale] move repeat sign

2005-09-27 Thread David W. Fenton
On 27 Sep 2005 at 13:18, Godofredo Romero wrote: > why not move the first before the repeat sign with the note mover > tool ? The note mover tool simply doesn't work that way. It *can't* move notes to a place where notes cannot be, which is between a repeat bar and the beginning of the measure

RE: [Finale] OT: MP3 Compression Comparison

2005-09-27 Thread Kurt Gnos
David, At 00:40 27.09.2005, you wrote: If you truly think that you can't set pan and reverb in Finale, then it suggests to me that your statements about Finale's inadequacy for tweaking a performance are not very credible, because you clearly don't know much at all about what Finale has been abl

Re: [Finale] move repeat sign

2005-09-27 Thread Godofredo Romero
why not move the first before the repeat sign  with the note mover tool ? GR Christopher Smith wrote: On Sep 26, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Dragos Oltean wrote: view this image http://www.svp-amd.cnet.ro/diverse/finale_repeat.jpg I want to move repeat sign after first note. It's poss

Re: [Finale] move repeat sign

2005-09-27 Thread Christopher Smith
On Sep 26, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Dragos Oltean wrote: view this image http://www.svp-amd.cnet.ro/diverse/finale_repeat.jpg I want to move repeat sign after first note. It's possible?   Thanks, Dragos.   Finale 2006, WinXP___ Dragos, There might be a new