Re: [Finale] Another serious question about what you use

2005-11-06 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Johannes Gebauer / 2005/11/04 / 05:02 AM wrote: Here comes a related Finale question: I would actually like to free my harddisk of Finale GPO (while keeping the full GPO). Has anyone done this? What can I delete, and will I cripple Finale of any features? I haven't seen anyone answered this.

Re: [Finale] Little Kazoo Band

2005-11-06 Thread Christopher Smith
On Nov 6, 2005, at 8:43 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote: For jazz, it wasn't even a little kazoo band until HP was introduced (when was that?). Listening to the even 8th during proofread was so painful back then. Even in 2002 you could have swing playback in defined amounts (the lighter the

Re: [Finale] Another serious question about what you use

2005-11-06 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 06.11.2005 A-NO-NE Music wrote: I haven't seen anyone answered this. Assuming you are non Mac(?), You can stop FinMac2006 to load GPO by removing Finale GPO.component which is located at: /Library/Audio/Plug-Ins/Components/ After you verify FinMac2006 launches without FinGPO, now you can

Re: [Finale] Beaming question

2005-11-06 Thread John Howell
At 10:22 AM +0100 11/6/05, dc wrote: David W. Fenton écrit: Johannes and Dennis C., and any others who edit older music, do you think there's anything in the beaming angle of the original sources that might be worth preserving? Do you also try to preserve the beaming breaks and reversed beams?

Re: [Finale] GPO question - cotinuo

2005-11-06 Thread Raymond Horton
Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 04.11.2005 Darcy James Argue wrote: Anyway, I think the only way you will get satisfactory results is by using two extra, hidden staves for harpsichord and bass. Which makes it far too much work to be worth it. Johannes I've done this sort of thing for

Re: [Finale] Beaming question

2005-11-06 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Nov 5, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 05.11.2005 David W. Fenton wrote: Johannes and Dennis C., and any others who edit older music, do you think there's anything in the beaming angle of the original sources that might be worth preserving? No. Do you also try to preserve

Re: [Finale] Another serious question about what you use

2005-11-06 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Johannes Gebauer / 2005/11/06 / 09:47 AM wrote: I am wondering whether I can savely remove Finale GPO, while a) not destroying Finale's full GPO functionality (including the setup wizard, although I hardly use the GPO option here), and b) not destryoing any of GPO Full's functionality. Or do

Re: [Finale] Little Kazoo Band

2005-11-06 Thread dhbailey
Christopher Smith wrote: On Nov 6, 2005, at 8:43 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote: For jazz, it wasn't even a little kazoo band until HP was introduced (when was that?). Listening to the even 8th during proofread was so painful back then. Even in 2002 you could have swing playback in defined

Re: [Finale] Little Kazoo Band

2005-11-06 Thread Chuck Israels
On Nov 6, 2005, at 2:29 PM, dhbailey wrote: Christopher Smith wrote: On Nov 6, 2005, at 8:43 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote: For jazz, it wasn't even a little kazoo band until HP was introduced (when was that?). Listening to the even 8th during proofread was so painful back then. Even in

Re: [Finale] Beaming question

2005-11-06 Thread David W. Fenton
On 6 Nov 2005 at 10:56, John Howell wrote: In my own editing, my goal is to make the music intelligible to modern singers while retaining as much as possible of what I consider important in the original. In renaissance vocal music this includes removing bar lines (and eliminating ties

Re: [Finale] Little Kazoo Band

2005-11-06 Thread David W. Fenton
On 6 Nov 2005 at 8:43, A-NO-NE Music wrote: David W. Fenton / 2005/11/04 / 03:32 PM wrote: You aren't limited to the little kazoo band, either, since all you'd need to do is install a better sound card, or run Finale 3.7.2 on a computer with a better sound card. For jazz, it wasn't even

Re: [Finale] Beaming question

2005-11-06 Thread David W. Fenton
On 6 Nov 2005 at 11:50, Andrew Stiller wrote: On Nov 5, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 05.11.2005 David W. Fenton wrote: Johannes and Dennis C., and any others who edit older music, do you think there's anything in the beaming angle of the original sources that might be

Re: [Finale] Little Kazoo Band

2005-11-06 Thread A-NO-NE Music
David W. Fenton / 2005/11/06 / 07:15 PM wrote: You couldn't have set the default volume for a staff? It's pretty easy: Yeah, if you have only one output device. I still prefer outputting to my rack of K2600Rs when I am in my studio. -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA

Re: [Finale] Project Roemer

2005-11-06 Thread Bruce K H Kau
People still use Ada? Darcy James Argue wrote: This will definitely be of interest to anyone interested in MusicXML, manuscript-style music fonts, or Clinton Roemer's book, The Art of Music Copying: http://roemer.sourceforge.net/ - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Finale] Beaming question

2005-11-06 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 07.11.2005 David W. Fenton wrote: I'd have to agree with this. Why would one keep the beam breaks and then discard most of the reversed beams? How do you know you're not discarding potentially useful musical information? Well, it is quite obvious to me that beam breaks can mean