Hello!
There's now a new plug-in available for download, called JW Default
Tuplets.
This plug-in has 2 different features:
* Resets the tuplets in the selected region to use the Default Tuplet
Definition (in the Document Options)
* Give statistics about how many tuplets in the selected
This is one topic I can't seem to find on the internet (without revealing a
million sites about either notation software or hindi music). How does one
write a part for synthesizer in a score with more traditional instruments?
___
Finale mailing
Hi Eric,
Basically, the same as any other part, though you obviously need to indicate
(at least in a general way) what manner of sounds you are looking for (square
wave, bright analog organ, dark digital piano, etc).
What, exactly, is the issue you're concerned about?
Cheers,
- DJA
-
On Mon, April 4, 2011 11:53 am, Eric Dentremont wrote:
This is one topic I can't seem to find on the internet (without revealing a
million sites about either notation software or hindi music). How does one
write a part for synthesizer in a score with more traditional instruments?
It seems to have inherited organ and accordion notation. Two staves like a
piano, with expressions above the staff explaining the registration (to
borrow an accordion term) or the stop (patchname, from organ writing.) You
write the note(s) they have to press down with a dynamic, and any other
Hi all,
For an upcoming show, all the brass and wind players in my bigband will be
standing (normally, trombones and winds are seated). The trombones have some
quick mute changes, which are obviously much more difficult when standing than
when seated.
I'm wondering if any of the trombone
In my view, a part is a part. What does it matter that it's a synth part. I'd
give it a stave and go, The other musicians join in from their scores and off
you go. Is there a more specific concern you had in mind?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Eric Dentremont
On 4 Apr 2011, at 18:04, Christopher Smith wrote:
here is some discussion as to whether you should notate octave-
transposing sounds in the played octave or the sounding octave, but
as long as you are clear as to which is needed and stay consistent,
it should work out either way.
Just a
Where the synth is not used extensively, I have placed it near the percussion
staves, (similar to
the piano part) but expecting a percussionist would be able to play the part.
The score indicates
the patch number, the note and duration, an indication of what the patch
represent, and the
Hi Darcy -
Those products are both designed for the size and weight of trumpet
mutes - I wouldn't trust it. I have been in similar situations like
you describe and we used bar stools to set our mutes on which kept
them high enough to be accessible. Good luck!
JB
On Apr 4, 2011, at
It's of course fine to use a singe staff for piano parts as well, or to switch
between single staff and grand staff on a system-by-system basis as needed.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
On 4 Apr 2011, at 3:27 PM, Steve Parker wrote:
On 4 Apr 2011, at 18:04,
in jazz maybe...
not a widespread practice in new music (but it is encountered from
time to time, is generally frowned upon by pianists) and certainly
unacceptable in classical music
It's of course fine to use a singe staff for piano parts as well, or
to switch between single staff and
Hi Jef,
In NYC new music circles it *is* in fact widespread practice, and I have in
fact been chastised by ensembles for NOT removing unused piano staves.
I wouldn't do it for orchestral piano parts, but in chamber music situations
it's the new norm.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB:
On 4 Apr 2011, at 21:11, Darcy James Argue wrote:
It's of course fine to use a singe staff for piano parts as well
Of course... but it is surprising how many piano (and synth) parts I
play that have pages and pages with one stave of two empty!
Steve P.
goddamn radikals...
In NYC new music circles it *is* in fact widespread practice, and I
have in fact been chastised by ensembles for NOT removing unused
piano staves.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Hello!
A new free plug-in is now available for download, called JW Hide
Articulations.
It hides the articulations in the selected region. Useful for example to
get the articulation to playback, but not print.
The hidden articulations will use the hidden text style, so they will
look
I don't think it's at all unacceptable.
I've played classical repertoire employing this.
Steve P.
On 4 Apr 2011, at 23:35, SN jef chippewa wrote:
certainly unacceptable in classical music
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Hi Steve,
Yeah, there is basically no good reason not to remove empty staves on piano
parts, other than mindless fidelity to tradition. And believe me, I understand
that in certain contexts, mindless fidelity to tradition is exactly what's
required! (As I said in my previous email, I would
The MuteRack seems too flimsy, for sure. I can't see the real size of the
Jo-Ral holder, so I couldn't say anything about that. Both unavailable, so it's
moot anyway.
You know who would know? Jennifer Wharton! She plays Bdway pits all the time
(I've seen her twice!) and she probably used them.
From: Jari Williamsson jari.williams...@mailbox.swipnet.se
Hello!
A new free plug-in is now available for download, called JW Make
Finale Work Properly.
It corrects all outstanding bugs, design and functionality
inconsistencies, and also adresses and finally implements solutions
to
I'm assuming this was sent last Friday.
On 5 April 2011 10:26, SN jef chippewa shirl...@newmusicnotation.comwrote:
From: Jari Williamsson jari.williams...@mailbox.swipnet.se
Hello!
A new free plug-in is now available for download, called JW Make Finale
Work Properly.
It corrects all
Man, I would pay $2000 easy for that plugin! Brilliant!
Look! Up in the sky! It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's SUPER JARI!
Christopher
On Mon Apr 4, at MondayApr 4 8:26 PM, SN jef chippewa wrote:
From: Jari Williamsson jari.williams...@mailbox.swipnet.se
Hello!
A new free plug-in
22 matches
Mail list logo
