On 28.04.2006 John Bell wrote:
In this particular instance, it would seem that Finalescript doesn't work for
me. I can only assume that my printer is in some way incompatible with the
script. It does everything right except that it doesn't print double-sided. I
don't resent the time I've
On 28 Apr 2006, at 07:21, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 28.04.2006 John Bell wrote:
In this particular instance, it would seem that Finalescript
doesn't work for me. I can only assume that my printer is in some
way incompatible with the script. It does everything right except
that it doesn't
On 28.04.2006 John Bell wrote:
The print dialog remembers (a) which printer was last used and (b) whatever Preset was
last used. The default Preset (Standard) is non-duplex. So if I have a number of
documents that need to be printed double-sided, I set an appropriate Preset for the first one,
On 28 Apr 2006, at 14:10, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 28.04.2006 John Bell wrote:
The print dialog remembers (a) which printer was last used and
(b) whatever Preset was last used. The default Preset (Standard)
is non-duplex. So if I have a number of documents that need to be
printed
On 28.04.2006 John Bell wrote:
Yes, but. As far as I remember FinaleScript always uses the default settings,
regardless of what you used before. I had this same problem with my LZR2080,
which by default printed at 400dpi, and with FS there was no way to get it to
print in 800dpi. I ended up
John,You should stick with your tried and trusted 'long winded' method like I have.You would have already saved yourself time. I was pulled up for suggesting this only a few digests back - but there you go, each to his own method!Finalescript - not that simple is it really guys? Jonathan Thanks
On 27.04.2006 Jonathan Smith wrote:
You should stick with your tried and trusted 'long winded' method like I have.
You would have already saved yourself time.
I was pulled up for suggesting this only a few digests back - but there you go,
each to his own method!
Finalescript - not that
On 27 Apr 2006, at 22:58, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 27.04.2006 Jonathan Smith wrote:
You should stick with your tried and trusted 'long winded' method
like I have.
You would have already saved yourself time. I was pulled up for
suggesting this only a few digests back - but there you go,
FinMac 2006d
Having for years made booklets using the slightly long-winded method
of adding pages to make multiples of 4 and specifying the page order
etc, I decided to try the FinaleScript method.
I set the printer to 2-up, short-edge binding. I ran the Print
Booklet script in the
On 26.04.2006 John Bell wrote:
FinMac 2006d
Having for years made booklets using the slightly long-winded method of adding
pages to make multiples of 4 and specifying the page order etc, I decided to
try the FinaleScript method.
I set the printer to 2-up, short-edge binding. I ran the Print
10 matches
Mail list logo
