On 11/20/2013 11:11 PM, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>
> There is absolutely no question that there is a body of potential
>> customers who would like to use computer notation, but the products have
>> such a steep learning curve that they giv
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
There is absolutely no question that there is a body of potential
> customers who would like to use computer notation, but the products have
> such a steep learning curve that they give up. We all know people like
> that.
>
If they though
On 11/20/2013 9:07 PM, terry cano wrote:
> This is my opinion only guys.
> I can happily do my projects in F2008 and you can also. Yes, there are some
> additions that would be nice but the fact is we are dealing with a system,
> music notation, that was created many years ago and hasn't change
This is my opinion only guys.
I can happily do my projects in F2008 and you can also. Yes, there are some
additions that would be nice but the fact is we are dealing with a system,
music notation, that was created many years ago and hasn't changed
significantly. Finale, Sibelius and now Steinb
On 11/20/2013 4:36 PM, David H. Bailey wrote:
> My first thought when reading about the reorganization at MakeMusic is
> that the new owners, being venture capitalists and not software
> developers, are looking to reshape the Finale team so they can make it
> more marketable to another company s
On 11/20/2013 3:19 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
> The likelihood that the Steinberg product will both A) meet its
> (unoffiicial mind you) release date target ...
>
> If they are saying now 18 months, then if it is one of the extremely few
> planned software projects lucky enough to actually see the
This forum is not a focus group. It seems to me the majority of people
here are long-term users who are content with the mode of operation that
has existed for over a decade. So I have no interest in a one-sided
discussion that will inevitably be a list of reasons why "it can't be
done." If
Hi all,
Regarding MusicXML support in DAWs, Cubase supports MusicXML import and
export, while Logic and SONAR support MusicXML export. Please let MOTU
know that you want to see MusicXML support added to Digital Performer.
It means more coming from customers like you than vendors like us.
Regardin
lo Alto Philharmonic
http://www.leeactor.com
-Original Message-
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
David H. Bailey
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:37 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Layoffs and reorganization announced at MakeMus
On 11/20/2013 4:09 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> I use Digital Performer, and I don't see MusicXML. They do have Final Cut Pro
> XML, OMF, AAF, and AudioDesk (which I believe is a scaled down version of DP
> they ship with their hardware interfaces).
>
[snip]
My first thought when reading about th
I use Digital Performer, and I don't see MusicXML. They do have Final Cut Pro
XML, OMF, AAF, and AudioDesk (which I believe is a scaled down version of DP
they ship with their hardware interfaces).
Generally, the midi from Finale is OK, but to really be able to switch back and
forth between it
does every version have to be "innovative"? hm,
innovative means "new" apparently. how much more
"new" shit do you think can really be crammed
into a mature notation programme today without
first vastly improving the frame all this stuff
you want needs to carry it?
there were some serious
The likelihood that the Steinberg product will both A) meet its
(unoffiicial mind you) release date target and B) be the be-all, end-all
notation product some are touting it as is highly unlikely. I don't mean to
sound like I would be unhappy if it happened, but I've been around this
track too many
These are great ideas.
A lot of people use Digital Performer for scoring as it has fairly good editing
of notation and is a full blown DAW.
http://www.motu.com/newsitems/marc-mann-on-dp-and-danny-elfman
http://www.motu.com/newsitems/and-the-oscar-goes-to-michael-giacchino
http://www.motu.com/new
On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
> On 11/20/2013 11:15 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>> I think both finale and Sibelius are pretty much the top of what you can do
>> with notation. I don't really know what people expect other than little
>> refinements to the programs in each ver
On Wed, November 20, 2013 2:39 pm, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> Audio editing.not sure if that is a biggie. Finale does have, I think, the
> ability to include/record audio. But how many people actually use that?
I'm not sure. I certainly do, and have for years. I have scores that include
electroni
Finally, someone with some "specifics" instead of just throwing around the word
"innovation".
Vector editing would be interesting, especially if you could save those vectors
in some sort of library.
Audio editing.not sure if that is a biggie. Finale does have, I think, the
ability to inclu
On Wed, November 20, 2013 11:15 am, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> Again, what do you want? What would be "real innovation"? Making it work
> better on Mac os x? Providing more sounds? Define a fileformat for the
> future? What?
> I think both finale and Sibelius are pretty much the top of what you can do
On 11/20/2013 11:15 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> I think both finale and Sibelius are pretty much the top of what you can do
> with notation. I don't really know what people expect other than little
> refinements to the programs in each version.
Everything about the process of notation can be made
On Nov 20, 2013, at 7:55 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
What isn't so clear is what the new direction is. Are they going the
way of Avid, essentially shutting it down and milking the cash cow? It
doesn't really appear so. If that isn't the idea, then what are they
trying to do?
Avids shutting d
Obviously they want to keep their dirty laundry inside the company,
which is understandable.
It is also understandable that after investing so much to fund that 2.5
year hiatus between products, the owners really couldn't chance shaking
things up before the product launch. The fact that they d
On 2013-11-20 16:27, Richard Yates wrote:
> The link describes major restructuring and a search for people to
> fill positions of "software developer; a software QA engineer; and a product
> designer." So they got out a new version, with its inevitable bugs, fired
> everyone, and are trying to find
r granted"?
> >
> > Is it supposed to be a great relief that Finale is there to give my
> > "music a clear path to tomorrow"?
> >
> > It's laughable.
> >
> > Richard Yates
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> >
Wow..smart move MakeMusicnot
Sent from my iSomething
--
On Nov 20, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Nigel Hanley wrote:
> Justin Phillips is no longer with MM. He'll be missed. Thanks Justin for the
> hands-on help you've given the Finale list over the last few years.
>
> http://www.sibeliusblog
to:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf
> Of
> > Nigel Hanley
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:33 AM
> > To: finale@shsu.edu
> > Subject: [Finale] Layoffs and reorganization announced at MakeMusic
> >
> > Justin Phillips is no longer with MM. He'
edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf
Of
> Nigel Hanley
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:33 AM
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: [Finale] Layoffs and reorganization announced at MakeMusic
>
> Justin Phillips is no longer with MM. He'll be missed. Thanks J
On 11/20/2013 9:33 AM, Nigel Hanley wrote:
> Justin Phillips is no longer with MM. He'll be missed. Thanks Justin for the
> hands-on help you've given the Finale list over the last few years.
>
> http://www.sibeliusblog.com/news/layoffs-and-reorganization-announced-at-makemusic/
>
Thank you for t
Justin Phillips is no longer with MM. He'll be missed. Thanks Justin for the
hands-on help you've given the Finale list over the last few years.
http://www.sibeliusblog.com/news/layoffs-and-reorganization-announced-at-makemusic/
Nigel Hanley
0418 977 237
i...@nigelhanley.com
nigel.han...@optus
28 matches
Mail list logo
