I'll try to do a speed comparison, when I have the patience. That is in
short supply, ever since my stroke. Thanks
Raymond Horton
Composer, Arranger
Minister of Music, Edwardsville (IN) United Methodist Church
Retired Bass Trombonist, Louisville Orchestra, 1971-2016
On Jul 1, 2016 3:29 PM, "Aaron
>> the
>> bullet and upgrading, it seems I inevitably come across a comment on
>> Fin2014
>> that makes me think it's not worth it.
>>
>> -Lee
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu]
worth it.
>
> -Lee
>
> -Original Message-
> From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf
> Of
> Raymond Horton
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 1:43 PM
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: Re: [Finale] Upgrading from Fin2011
>
> 2014 .5
riginal Message-
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
Raymond Horton
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 1:43 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Upgrading from Fin2011
2014 .5 is good. 2012 is faster for very large files. Ymmv . Windows
Raymond Horton
Com
Once of the great improvements in 2014 and higher is beat-attachment of
smarts shapes (rather than measure attachment). Not only can you get more
precise endpoints, you can unlink the endpoints in parts and edit them
separately.
Another great improvement (with 2014) is that most of the special too
2014 .5 is good. 2012 is faster for very large files. Ymmv . Windows
Raymond Horton
Composer, Arranger
Minister of Music, Edwardsville (IN) United Methodist Church
Retired Bass Trombonist, Louisville Orchestra, 1971-2016
On Jul 1, 2016 3:29 PM, "Aaron Sherber" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've kept wor
Pages (former career ended by disability):
http://tinyurl.com/ygpj7og
Mariposa Symphony Orchestra: http://tinyurl.com/MariposaSO
From: Aaron Sherber
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 12:29 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] Upgrading from Fin2011
Hi all,
I've kept working in Fin201
Hi all,
I've kept working in Fin2011 for several years, because it has met my needs
and because I haven't been working in Finale enough lately to figure out a
new version. But I've been having a few minor compatibility issues with
Windows 10, so I think it's time to move on.
I have both Fin2012 a
On 8/4/2014 10:15 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:
> I've had fair results with the 2014 "save to 2012" feature - seems to
> work pretty well. Kim could ask her student to do so. Not sure about
> the 2012-2011 transfer, though.
>
> I am trying to figure out what 2014 does better (many things), do them
>
I've had fair results with the 2014 "save to 2012" feature - seems to
work pretty well. Kim could ask her student to do so. Not sure about
the 2012-2011 transfer, though.
I am trying to figure out what 2014 does better (many things), do them
on this large project, and maybe save back to 2012 for
Kim - I think you can upgrade for $139. Keep in mind that your Mac OS must be
10.7 or higher for Finale 2014.
JB
Sent from my iPhone using my thumbs w/out a spellchecker
On Aug 4, 2014, at 12:22 PM, Kim Richmond wrote:
> Hey guys,
>I’ve got MacFin11. One of my students (via Skype) has the
Kim he can send them as XML from Finale 2014 you can open them pretty much as
any Finale file
'hope this helps
Terry
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
- Reply message -
From: "Kim Richmond"
To: "FINALE FINALE LIST"
Subject: [Finale] UPGRADING
Date: Mon, A
On 8/4/2014 1:22 PM, Kim Richmond wrote:
> Hey guys, I’ve got MacFin11. One of my students (via Skype) has the
> latest version, so I cannot open his files when he sends me
> assignments. Is it going to cost me an arm and leg to upgrade, being
> this far behind. I’m happy just having 2011 version,
Hey guys,
I’ve got MacFin11. One of my students (via Skype) has the latest
version, so I cannot open his files when he sends me assignments. Is it going
to cost me an arm and leg to upgrade, being this far behind. I’m happy just
having 2011 version, except for this.
All the best,
Kim R
Jim,
Unfortunately I have no 12x18 paper to test to. I mainly print single sheets
here. My larger prints (two sheet paper i.e. 12x18) are printed elsewhere. I
have no need to keep that paper in stock. I print large formatted scores mostly.
_
Scott,
What size paper are you printing on? I can print on 8½ x 11 & 11 x 17 both
landscape and portrait, and 9 x 12 portrait with no problem. But when I try to
print on 12 x 18 landscape I am not able. As I have researched this it seems to
apply across the board outside of Finale. I noticed a
I wish I understood how this is working for you. I am not the only one with
this problem.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5676471
This thread aptly describes my experience - including HP's eagerness to sell me
a new printer. They simply say that they no longer support the "old" product.
That still confuses me chuck because I never once had a printing problem with
my HP 5000 when I upgraded to Mavericks or now even on 10.10. Now I don’t
duplex but I print booklet style and multiple sizes of paper as well.
___
J. Scott Jone
Thanks to everyone who replied to my inquiry. Unfortunately, a $119 upgrade
offer appeared in my inbox before I came back to check the list, and I bit the
bullet. (Feeling REALLY broke now.) Sure wish I knew why Finale 2012 wasn't
opening for me.
Thurletta Brown-Gavins
10.9.4 seems to be incompatible with my printer driver. (10.9.2 was for
sure fine, and I'm not certain about 10.9.3.) But I am still able to print
because I run Snow Leopard with VMWare Fusion. I highly recommend setting
up a virtual of the oldest Mac OS you can using Fusion. It has saved many
of m
Incompatibility with an old (and still reliable) HP 5000 is the only thing that
prevents me from upgrading to Mavericks. As far as I can tell (haven't checked
this lately) there are no drivers that will work with this printer and
Mavericks. There were some suggestions of things to try - but no
I am running 10.10 beta and can go back as far as 2009 Finale and working fine.
I tried 2008 and half way through start up I get an "Unhanded exception caught"
message and it closes.
___
J. Scott Jones
Band/Orchestra Director/Freelance Tru
The only problem I had after the Mavericks upgrade was printing 2 sides up on
12x18 landscape. Seems to be a compatibility problem with Mavericks and HP.
The only way I can make it work is to save as a PDF and configure each PDF part
separately to 12X18 landscape. If anyone has a work around, I
10.9 (mavericks) didn't break finale 2012 for me. My 10.9 system still
can run finale 2008 just fine.
Actually, 10.9 upgrade was probably the most painless upgrade in a
long time for me. I can't think of anything that stopped working.
Also, in the upcoming 10.10, finale 2014 and 2012 work
Sent f
Finale 2012 is supposed to work in Mavericks. Have you tried re-installing?
Often the Finale installation breaks for me when I upgrade the OS or migrate to
another computer. Re-installation fixes it.
Christopher
On Wed Jul 16, at WednesdayJul 16 7:26 AM, Thurletta Brown-Gavins wrote:
> I fina
I finally bit the bullet yesterday and purchased a MacBook Pro running
Mavericks. You guessed it: Finale 2012 is dead (along with a slew of my other
apps).
Anyone have any idea whether there is likely to be an upcoming upgrade-special
that will make the leap to Finale 2014 cheaper than $139? Fe
No
Sent from my iSomething
--
> On Apr 16, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
>
> Listers,
>
> I am running Finale 2K11 on my MacBook Pro. My current OS is Snow
> Leopard. (10.6.8)
>
> Do I need to "de-authorize" Finale before upgrading to Mavericks, or
> will Finale continue to be au
Listers,
I am running Finale 2K11 on my MacBook Pro. My current OS is Snow
Leopard. (10.6.8)
Do I need to "de-authorize" Finale before upgrading to Mavericks, or
will Finale continue to be authorized?
Larry
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
h
Aha. My issue is that the stop button is on a different monitor, so I am
unlikely to ingrain that habit. Thanks anyway.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Darcy James Argue
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Glad it helped! Please let MM know, this is a nasty bug and it had me
> tearing my hair out for days
Hi Robert,
Glad it helped! Please let MM know, this is a nasty bug and it had me tearing
my hair out for days until I discovered that it was MIDI Thru related.
As for the playback, I've long gotten into the habit of clicking the "Stop"
button on the playback controls before hitting spacebar, wh
Hi Robert,
Yes -- you can assign the MIDI Thru to an empty Fixed channel that does not
have an instrument associated with it.
Let me know if this helps! If it does, please report it to MM, as the bug is
100% reproducible on my system, but it would be nice to have corroboration.
Cheers,
- DJA
Darcy, that seems to have fixed the problem! Thanks so much for your quick
reply that saved me a bunch of work.
On another topic:
I am attempting to leave the playback controls up so as to get human
playback. I set it to play from the left measure, but when I hit space to
top playback, it always
Aha. I did turn off MIDI Thru because I didn't want to hear the instrument
sounds on top of my kbd sounds in Speedy. Do you know another way to
suppress them?
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Darcy James Argue
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I was getting severe crashes with Fin2012a, which I eventually
Hi Robert,
I was getting severe crashes with Fin2012a, which I eventually discovered were
related to my MIDI Thru setting, of all things.
If your MIDI Thru is currently set to "Off," try turning it on (use "Fixed" or
"Smart" or whatever, it doesn't seem to matter so long as it is on) and see if
I am about to retract exactly what I said about Fin12 a day or two ago. Up
until now my work with Fin12 was either as a plugin developer or upgrading
an old piece that needed no revisions but needed Unicode text to replace
unworkable EPS graphics. But now that I have started a new piece in Fin12,
I
I upgraded to every version of Finale from v1.0 thru Fin97. Since then I have
been upgrading about every other year: Fin00, Fin02, Fin03, and recently Fin05.
My reason for skipping was invariably that the benefits did not outweigh the
pain. (Fin04 had substantial benefits but also even worse pai
Owain Sutton wrote:
Is the reverse not true, that reluctantly buying an upgrade sends the
message "Keep up the good work, chaps"?
Could be that's the message that gets through. But at least they'll
keep on working.
That's the dilemma -- do you view purchasing upgrades as rewarding bad
past beh
dhbailey wrote:
Owain Sutton wrote:
Harold Owen wrote:
Owain Sutton writes:
Even if I had the cash, I wouldn't upgrade, after the endless woes
I've heard about it on this list!
See, folks! You've scared away another customer and warmed the hearts
of Sibelius users! I wonder if some of these p
Owain Sutton wrote:
Harold Owen wrote:
Owain Sutton writes:
Even if I had the cash, I wouldn't upgrade, after the endless woes
I've heard about it on this list!
See, folks! You've scared away another customer and warmed the hearts
of Sibelius users! I wonder if some of these posts are from spie
39 matches
Mail list logo
