[Finale 2002]
I have a passage with some very short notes at the end of the bar, which
Finale will not space out adequately (using note spacing the notes get
squashed, time-sig and beat spacing are too wide). I can fix this problem
by increasing the minimum size of the measure in document
At 9:05 AM -0400 9/17/07, David W. Fenton wrote:
But a journal accepting submissings for publication has to be more
versatile in what it can accept,
But, if they have acceptance standards, why can they not enforce them?
To put it in very Victorian terms: If their standards say that they
On Sep 20, 2007, at 4:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Finale 2002]
I have a passage with some very short notes at the end of the bar,
which
Finale will not space out adequately (using note spacing the notes get
squashed, time-sig and beat spacing are too wide). I can fix this
problem
by
Dick Hauser / 07.9.19 / 9:55 PM wrote:
Of course, it follows with 25 or 30 threads of similar looking stuff,
all of which means nothing to me.
But that's where the clue is. The address error doesn't mean nothing in
crash log. Scroll down, and find where it sez:
Thread n Crashed:
Copy
David W. Fenton / 07.9.19 / 4:09 PM wrote:
I don't think that's entirely true. Finale 97 saw the final switch to
Win32 and the adoption by Coda of Microsoft development tools. That
required a complete rewrite of the codebase, at least that's what I
got from the things our good friend Randy
I am having problems in 2k7 mirroring passages using the method to
shift-option-click on the target measure. This doesn't work with
mirroring, it seems, and I am now remembering there was a bug somewhere.
Can someone tell me what the workaround was?
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
On 20.09.2007 Johannes Gebauer wrote:
I am having problems in 2k7 mirroring passages using the method to
shift-option-click on the target measure. This doesn't work with mirroring, it
seems, and I am now remembering there was a bug somewhere. Can someone tell me
what the workaround was?
Today I reached my limit with my POS Microtek scanner and threw it
out, in pieces. I've been wanting a better scanner for some time and
now I'm there.
So, to the collective wisdom of this list, what are some of your
recommendations on scanners? I'm on a Mac, and I'd like to be able
to
Virtually all scanners are USB 2.0 now. There just aren't very many
FireWire scanners out there.
The Epson Perfection V200 Photo is a very good inexpensive scanner.
The bundled dust removal software actually works quite well.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 20
ThomaStudios / 07.9.20 / 1:44 PM wrote:
So, to the collective wisdom of this list, what are some of your
recommendations on scanners?
I am no scanner expert, but I always buy/recommend HP scanners,
dedicated one instead of all-in-one, and never been disappointed. Their
service is quite
Sorry it's taken me so long to respond on this. But today I
realized, quite by accident, that every time I attempted to change
the time signature on the recalcitrant measure, it was actually
changing the 4th measure way back at the beginning, even tho I was
selecting the 56th measure.
On 20 Sep 2007 at 12:09, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
David W. Fenton / 07.9.19 / 4:09 PM wrote:
I don't think that's entirely true. Finale 97 saw the final switch to
Win32 and the adoption by Coda of Microsoft development tools. That
required a complete rewrite of the codebase, at least that's
Thanks Hiro (and Darcy),
After I posted the message I came to realize the USB is just fine for
my needs.
Hiro, I was looking at HP's site earlier, and some of their mid-range
models do look interesting. And you're right. Every HP printer I've
had has been a tank, and the output has
On 20 Sep 2007 at 4:42, Dennis W. Manasco wrote:
At 9:05 AM -0400 9/17/07, David W. Fenton wrote:
But a journal accepting submissings for publication has to be more
versatile in what it can accept,
But, if they have acceptance standards, why can they not enforce them?
A red herring.
At 3:43 PM -0400 9/20/07, David W. Fenton wrote:
My bet is that they're going to get DOCX submissions anyway, and then
spend an inordinate amount of time rejecting those submissions, and,
in the case of articles they want to publish, they'll be helping the
people convert to DOC, or they'll be
I agree with David. HP's scanners are not remotely of the same
quality as HP printers.
You really want a scanner from a company that takes scanning
seriously, like Epson.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
___
Finale mailing
I have a Canon MP830 scanner/printer. It's perfect and fast as scanner and
printer. I'm just digitizing everything I use at school, scores, worksheets,
lead sheets, and I have never had a better solution (I have had HP, Epson
and Canon scanners earlier).
It's duplex/duplex - that means it can
On 20 Sep 2007 at 16:14, John Howell wrote:
I'm hesitant to download and install a converter that's still in
Beta. Is that irrational?
Not as a general principle, but in the case of a converter, it should
be completely safe, I'd think.
--
David W. Fenton
My sentiments precisely.I have an Epson Perfection that runs like a top ==
and which replaced an HP which barely ran at all.
Go with Epson - anything - rather than HP.
Best,
Les
Les Marsden
Founding Music Director and Conductor,
The Mariposa Symphony Orchestra
Music and Mariposa? Ah,
Darcy James Argue wrote:
I agree with David. HP's scanners are not remotely of the same quality
as HP printers.
You really want a scanner from a company that takes scanning seriously,
like Epson.
I have an HP scanner which has worked liked a true warrior for 10 years
now and shows no
On 20 Sep 2007 at 19:25, dhbailey wrote:
I have an HP scanner which has worked liked a true warrior for 10 years
now and shows no sign of giving up the ghost. It's certainly as rugged
a workhorse as my HP2100 printer.
My HP scanner is great, too, but it was manufactured before 2000. HP
At 7:06 PM -0400 9/20/07, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 20 Sep 2007 at 16:14, John Howell wrote:
I'm hesitant to download and install a converter that's still in
Beta. Is that irrational?
Not as a general principle, but in the case of a converter, it should
be completely safe, I'd think.
I've seen this bug in 2007. Another way it shows is when you double
click a measure in the Measure Tool to add a double bar, and it adds
it in two places. THere are other manifestations, but I can't think
of another right now.
To the best of my knowledge, it is not present in 2008 (one of
On Sep 20, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Dick Hauser wrote:
On Sep 19, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
The only time I ever had a bad address error is when I had a bad
RAM chip.
MemTest is a shareware app that does a great job of detecting bad
RAM. I highly recommend it.
Barring that,
On Sep 20, 2007, at 8:49 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Dick Hauser wrote:
On Sep 19, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
The only time I ever had a bad address error is when I had a bad
RAM chip.
MemTest is a shareware app that does a great job of
25 matches
Mail list logo
