Is it really true that the clef in a part can't be unlinked from the clef in
the score? There's a legitimate need for this, e.g., a bassoon or trombone
staff shared by 2 parts, both of which in the score are in tenor clef (to
save space), but the lower voice in the part should be in bass clef
All of them require workarounds.
The 8va thing I would to with an octave transposing staff style (in the
part).
For different clefs on a shared staff, you could try changing the
instrument of the part only. That, or using a transposing staff style that
imposes the clef you want.
Many times I
I'm putting an old Kenton chart into Finale (always have a safety copy
in case some bozo loses or destroys a part!) and have found some chord
markings that are new to me.
Measure 1 is D9(flat)
Measure 6 is E9(natural)
This might be how it was done back in the day, but .. how would these be
Hi Carl - I've never seen that either. My first guess would be that the 7th
is assumed and the parenthesized comments concern the ninth in each chord.
Which chart/arranger? - Don Hart
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:42 PM, dershem ders...@cox.net wrote:
I'm putting an old Kenton chart into Finale
On 12/25/2012 9:07 PM, Don Hart wrote:
Hi Carl - I've never seen that either. My first guess would be that the 7th
is assumed and the parenthesized comments concern the ninth in each chord.
Which chart/arranger? - Don Hart
The Marke Winsten arrangement of Artistry in Rhythm. Not a bad
What do the parts tell you?
Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.
On Dec 26, 2012, at 12:07 AM, Don Hart donhartmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Carl - I've never seen that either. My first guess would be that the 7th
is assumed and the parenthesized comments concern the ninth in each
On 12/25/2012 9:09 PM, Williams, Jim wrote:
What do the parts tell you?
Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.
First one is a D9 - D, F#, A, C, Eb. D7(b9)?
Second is an E9 - E, G#, B, D, F E7(b9)?
Both have that b7, b9, but both have M3, so not minor 9 chords.
Interesting
Yeah...interesting indeed. Never seen that before.
You've described the chords correctly as 7(b9), so why not go with what the
parts are saying?
Jim
Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.
On Dec 26, 2012, at 12:49 AM, dershem ders...@cox.net wrote:
On 12/25/2012 9:09 PM,
On 12/25/2012 9:54 PM, Williams, Jim wrote:
Yeah...interesting indeed. Never seen that before.
You've described the chords correctly as 7(b9), so why not go with what the
parts are saying?
Jim
Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.
Thanks, Jim. I appreciate the feedback.
Sure...glad to help.
I see some logic to it now--in D9(flat), the flat 9 is indeed flat--e flat.
For E9(natural), the flat 9 is F natural.
Still odd. ;-0
Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.
On Dec 26, 2012, at 1:03 AM, dershem ders...@cox.net wrote:
On 12/25/2012 9:54 PM,
10 matches
Mail list logo
