Thank you Klaus! That did it.
I was going in circles here :-(
Dr.A.S.Weinstangel
sasha.weinstan...@utoronto.ca
cel.647-292-4605
> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:58:41 +
> From: yorkmaster...@yahoo.com
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: Re: [Finale] beaming over rests
>
> =>
=> Document Options (alt+cmd+A on Mac)=> Beams=> Uncheck: Allow Rests To Float
Klaus
Subject: Re: [Finale] beaming over rests
Fin2012c Win 8.1
When the beams are set to go over the rests, the rests are globally pushed down
into the first space. How to keep them in the
Fin2012c Win 8.1
When the beams are set to go over the rests, the rests are globally pushed down
into the first space. How to keep them in their normal position?
Thanks for your help!
Dr.A.S.Weinstangel
sasha.weinstan...@utoronto.ca
cel.647-292-4605
Your example helped illustrate the problem. In this case you need to break
the beam befor the 32nd notes. Use the beam extention tool on both extending
the
stubs AND extend the 8th beam backwards to connect the 32nd note group to the
16ths.
Sent a pdf of the example privately
***
OK, I got a chance finally to look at this again this morning,
applying the info I got here. Thanks for everyone's input. But
there are still issues.
For example, this is the original layout of a measure in question:
<>
The client wants it to look like this:
<>
This 2nd example was achi
On 11.09.2007 ThomaStudios wrote:
The Bean Extension Tool (under Special Tools) will ONLY extend the end of the
beams. Not the internal, secondary beams.
And I always thought the Bean Extension tool was for extending your
beans, green, white and red.
Johannes ;-)
--
http://www.musikmanufak
of course it can be done - just do what John wrote before: ONLY
select 16th note, NOT 8th...
good luck.
On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:55 PM, ThomaStudios wrote:
I know. But if you can get it to extend an internal 16th beam
stub, let me know how. You can ONLY extend the beginning and end
of a bea
make sure to take OFF the general option: extend secondary beams over
rests
of course it can be done - just do what John wrote before: ONLY
select 16th note, NOT 8th...
good luck.
On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:55 PM, ThomaStudios wrote:
I know. But if you can get it to extend an internal 16th b
I know. But if you can get it to extend an internal 16th beam stub,
let me know how. You can ONLY extend the beginning and end of a beam
set. Try this: notate 8th note, 16th rest, 16th note, and try to
extend the secondary beam from the last 16th note over the rest.
Can't be done.
J
And how far back does the beaming tool have this feature. Was it there in
2003?
>
> In a message dated 9/11/07 11:37:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The beam extention tool will do this where you want it.
>
>> Yep, I wasn't completely clear. Right now, I am able to beam over
>> rests, but the
In a message dated 9/11/07 1:58:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The Beam Extension tool won't give stem stubs, though, will it?
>
>
The global settings will give you the stubs. You only need to adjust the
places where you want the 16th beams over the rests.
In a message dated 9/11/07 1:59:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The Bean Extension Tool (under Special Tools) will ONLY extend the
> end of the beams. Not the internal, secondary beams.
>
>
Not so. When you dbl click the handle, select 16th NOT 8th.
***
The Bean Extension Tool (under Special Tools) will ONLY extend the
end of the beams. Not the internal, secondary beams.
J D Thomas
ThomaStudios
On Sep 11, 2007, at 11:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/11/07 11:37:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The beam extention tool
The Beam Extension tool won't give stem stubs, though, will it?
Christopher
On 11-Sep-07, at 2:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/11/07 11:37:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The beam extention tool will do this where you want it.
Yep, I wasn't completely clear. Right no
In a message dated 9/11/07 11:37:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The beam extention tool will do this where you want it.
> Yep, I wasn't completely clear. Right now, I am able to beam over
> rests, but the secondary beams are broken in the global setting, and
> the client wants them solidly a
On 11-Sep-07, at 12:36 PM, ThomaStudios wrote:
Yep, I wasn't completely clear. Right now, I am able to beam over
rests, but the secondary beams are broken in the global setting,
and the client wants them solidly across the rests in some
instances, along with stub stems to more clearly ind
Yep, I wasn't completely clear. Right now, I am able to beam over
rests, but the secondary beams are broken in the global setting, and
the client wants them solidly across the rests in some instances,
along with stub stems to more clearly indicate the rhythm. That's
what I'm looking for s
ThomaStudios wrote, on 9/11/2007 10:57 AM:
Using FinMac 2K7, is there a way to have Finale beam over rests, NOT
globally, but on a case by case basis. This has been lacking in every
version, and I've just accepted that.
Unless I misunderstand your request, you can beam over rests by placing
Using FinMac 2K7, is there a way to have Finale beam over rests, NOT
globally, but on a case by case basis. This has been lacking in
every version, and I've just accepted that. Now a client want's a
specific look and I don't see any options via the Document Options,
Staff Styles, or even
Christopher Smith wrote:
Man, I HATE that! It drives me NUTS that WE have to acquiesce to the
program, instead of the other way around, for such a simple thing!
There is no reason on earth that Finale should not be able to change
the include rests option from bar to bar, or even beat to beat,
On Oct 27, 2006, at 1:26 PM, ThomaStudios wrote:
Thanks Robert for the workaround. As it turned out, I discussed
the issue with the client and he acquiesced to a more 'Finale-
friendly' notation that I suggested.
Man, I HATE that! It drives me NUTS that WE have to acquiesce to the
progr
Original Message-
From: ThomaStudios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 02:46 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] Beaming over rests
I have a client who is writing a piece that contains quite a bit of
modern notation conventions. In one instance, he has a series of
ma
Friday, October 27, 2006 02:46 PM
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: [Finale] Beaming over rests
>
> I have a client who is writing a piece that contains quite a bit of
> modern notation conventions. In one instance, he has a series of
> many 64th notes in one measure, with a fe
u
> Subject: [Finale] Beaming over rests
>
>
> I have a client who is writing a piece that contains quite a bit of
> modern notation conventions. In one instance, he has a series of
> many 64th notes in one measure, with a few rests in the pattern. He
> wants al
I have a client who is writing a piece that contains quite a bit of
modern notation conventions. In one instance, he has a series of
many 64th notes in one measure, with a few rests in the pattern. He
wants all 4 beams showing over the rests so I can feather the beams.
But Finale 2K7Mac
25 matches
Mail list logo
