Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-17 Thread Jari Williamsson
Richard Yates wrote: Now, apparently only for reasons of foolish consistency to help berginners, it has been changed to the Options Menu which makes the shortcut Alt-O-A. This combination is impossible with one hand. For me the change is an affront to experienced users. What's wrong with using

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-17 Thread Richard Yates
Now, apparently only for reasons of foolish consistency to help berginners, it has been changed to the Options Menu which makes the shortcut Alt-O-A. This combination is impossible with one hand. For me the change is an affront to experienced users. What's wrong with using Shift+Alt+S?

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread Christopher Smith
On Mar 16, 2005, at 7:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm working with the demo version of F2005, which does not include any documentation or online help (stupidly, if I may say so). If I want to delete the contents of e.g. layer 4 in a given part, In Finale 2002 I'm used to being able to select

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread Jari Williamsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Show Active Layer Only is no more, apparently. In Fin2005 it was moved to the Options menu, since it was misleading to have it in the View menu (it's an option that's stored in the document, it affects editing and printing). Bwst regards, Jari Williamsson

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread dhbailey
Jari Williamsson wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Show Active Layer Only is no more, apparently. In Fin2005 it was moved to the Options menu, since it was misleading to have it in the View menu (it's an option that's stored in the document, it affects editing and printing). Bwst regards,

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread Jari Williamsson
dhbailey wrote: Everything else in the View menu is an Option and some can affect printing as well (colors, for instance), so why not include them ALL in the Options menu? Colors are not stored in the document and they don't affect editing. Best regards, Jari Williamsson

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread Chuck Israels
On Mar 16, 2005, at 5:43 AM, dhbailey wrote: If it's called show it should be in the View menu. Kinds seems that way to me too. Since it has many more functions, it ought to be renamed to Work on and Display Active Layer Only and then I wouldn't have any objection to it being in the Options

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread Mark D Lew
On Mar 16, 2005, at 5:43 AM, dhbailey wrote: If it's called show it should be in the View menu. Agreed, but I'd say it shouldn't be called show. The change makes sense. This change should have been near the top of the what's new in v2k5 message. They still do that, right? The real purpose of

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread Jari Williamsson
Mark D Lew wrote: On Mar 16, 2005, at 5:43 AM, dhbailey wrote: If it's called show it should be in the View menu. Agreed, but I'd say it shouldn't be called show. The change makes sense. I think the issue might be that it's still called Show Active Layer Only, despite the move to the Options

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread A-NO-NE Music
but I'd say it shouldn't be called show. The change makes sense. Other applications such as DP calls such view filter, you filter out data you don't want to mess with. -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread David W. Fenton
On 16 Mar 2005 at 9:29, Mark D Lew wrote: On Mar 16, 2005, at 5:43 AM, dhbailey wrote: If it's called show it should be in the View menu. Agreed, but I'd say it shouldn't be called show. The change makes sense. I don't quite understand why a command must exist on only one menu,

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread dhbailey
Jari Williamsson wrote: dhbailey wrote: Everything else in the View menu is an Option and some can affect printing as well (colors, for instance), so why not include them ALL in the Options menu? Colors are not stored in the document and they don't affect editing. View Active Layer isn't stored

RE: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread Keith Helgesen
of Music, Canberra City Band. Ph: (02) 62910787. Band Mob. 0436-620587 Private Mob 0417-042171 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dhbailey Sent: Thursday, 17 March 2005 6:49 AM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] removing contents

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread dhbailey
Keith Helgesen wrote: Just an aside to this thread- someone mentioned colours. Often when looking on screen at a score- or especially a short score, I am aware of how useful it is to have, say, the 'lead' line, or a counter melody, in a colour. (Or even an obscure entry.) Even a Solo passage in

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread Jari Williamsson
dhbailey wrote: View Active Layer isn't stored in the document, either. On my Fin2005 at least, Show Active Layer Only is stored with the document. Best regards, Jari Williamsson ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread dhbailey
Jari Williamsson wrote: dhbailey wrote: View Active Layer isn't stored in the document, either. On my Fin2005 at least, Show Active Layer Only is stored with the document. You are correct, my mistake. What ISN'T saved is that it doesn't open the document with the layer you had active when

Re: [Finale] removing contents of a single layer

2005-03-16 Thread Richard Yates
Of course, it doesn't matter, as long as one can find it. The Menu per se does not matter at all. What does matter is the shortcut. I have been doing Alt-V-A so long that it is a natural no-look move with my left hand. Now, apparently only for reasons of foolish consistency to help berginners,