cc -no-cpp-precomp -Iloader -Ilibvo -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/gtk-1.2
-I/sw/include/glib-1.2 -I/sw/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
-multiply_defined suppress -o mplayer mplayer.o mp_msg.o open.o parse_es.o
ac3-iec958.o find_sub.o aviprint.o dec_audio.o dec_video.o aviwrite.o
aviheader.o
Sure, will do as soon as I get everything done.
Kyle Moffett
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 09:29 , David R. Morrison wrote:
> At the very least, you could create all 15 .info files, wrap them up
> into
> a single .tar file, and put the .tar file onto the package submission
> tracker. Don't
At the very least, you could create all 15 .info files, wrap them up into
a single .tar file, and put the .tar file onto the package submission
tracker. Don't make me download 15 separate things!
Thanks,
Dave
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
On 25/1/02 1:26 PM, "Kyle Moffett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 09:20 , Jeremy Higgs wrote:
>
>> On 25/1/02 1:15 PM, "Kyle Moffett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I am attempting to create a slew of packages for Apache::ASP and all
>>> its
>>> dependancies,
On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 01:42 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Well, to put it like that: there is currently no unstable
> bindist. There is no infrastructure for one, either. So your
> chance is 0% to get into an "official" unstable bindist,
> obviously.
> You can of course make your .deb ava
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 09:20 , Jeremy Higgs wrote:
> On 25/1/02 1:15 PM, "Kyle Moffett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am attempting to create a slew of packages for Apache::ASP and all
>> its
>> dependancies, should I create them all, then post to a single package
>> submission? O
shit I didn't know that, I did diff -ru and ran
Patch: %f.patch
PatchScript: touch blah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I usually extract the source tarball twice, and move one to
>SOURCE-patched,
>modify everything in then, and then run 'diff -ru SOURCE SOURCE-patch >
>PACKAGE-VERSION-REVISION.patch
Where would you start?? :)
cc -no-cpp-precomp -Iloader -Ilibvo -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/gtk-1.2
-I/sw/include/glib-1.2 -I/sw/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -o
mplayer mplayer.o mp_msg.o open.o parse_es.o ac3-iec958.o find_sub.o
aviprint.o dec_audio.o dec_video.o aviwrite.o aviheader.o
On 25/1/02 1:15 PM, "Kyle Moffett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am attempting to create a slew of packages for Apache::ASP and all its
> dependancies, should I create them all, then post to a single package
> submission? Or should I post individually (like 15 different
> submissions)?
Not sure
I am attempting to create a slew of packages for Apache::ASP and all its
dependancies, should I create them all, then post to a single package
submission? Or should I post individually (like 15 different
submissions)?
Also, can somebody give the procedure for using diff to make a patch, I
did
Max: I saw this too. The problem is, we are linking the libs in the
right order. It looks like the linker is not respecting that.
-Jeff
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Max Horn wrote:
> I searched the net and found this:
>
> http://www.perchine.com/dyp/x/motif-faq/part9/faq-doc-24.html
>
> To quote it:
At 20:12 Uhr -0500 24.01.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>Max, con you explain this little item in your patchfile for the new
>libxml2 from today? You've patched Makefile.in with
>
>-LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
>+LDFLAGS = -L./.libs @LDFLAGS@
>
>and I'm curious about what this does and why it's necessary.
I searched the net and found this:
http://www.perchine.com/dyp/x/motif-faq/part9/faq-doc-24.html
To quote it:
>269) Why do I get "Error: attempt to add non-widget child "dsm" to parent"?
>
>[Last modified: May 95]
>
>Answer: You're linking your libraries in the wrong order. You must link -lXm
Max, con you explain this little item in your patchfile for the new
libxml2 from today? You've patched Makefile.in with
-LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
+LDFLAGS = -L./.libs @LDFLAGS@
and I'm curious about what this does and why it's necessary. (And if
the same effect could be achieved with SetLDFLAGS .)
We have a small problem with nedit's version: in stable there is
version 5.2RC1, and in unstable we have 5.2 - which is the newer one.
But dpkg/fink think RC1 is newer :/ I only now noticed that I had in
fact RC1 installed...
In debian, they use "epoches" to fix this. It probably wouldn't be
Daniel:
OK - so it looks like you can't replace a package with a package that
provides something that conflicts with the package you are replacing.
How's that for a tongue twister! I don't see any way around this one
short of removing the "Provides: libgl" from xfree86-base. Perhaps we
could p
hmm I might to that...I guess i could just add it to just about any .h in
the pkg, or should I make a new file and patch what needs it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>pthread_kill isn't implemented in Darwin, although support went into CVS
>HEAD a few days back!!!
>You could do what MySQL does, whic
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 04:34 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
> anyone know a work around for the undefined symbol _pthread_kill ?? I
> have -lpthread set. I think I remember Finlay telling my that darwin
> couldn't do _pthread_kill IIRC. So is there a work aroung to this?
pthread_kill i
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 20:21:48 +0100
Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, you should check why your patches are that huge.
> Let me guess,
> you run autoconf/automake? That is the most common cause
> for gigantic
> patches like that. So, instead of modifying Makefile.am
> and
> configure
At 1:06 Uhr +0900 25.01.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>Hi,
>I am currently spending some time in gdb with gnucash-1.6.5...
>
>Anyway, is it okay to symlink %p/share/gnucash/doc tp
>%p/share/doc/gnucash to provide the required docs? (I am asking
>because gnucash doesn't seem to be that broken, so I
anyone know a work around for the undefined symbol _pthread_kill ?? I
have -lpthread set. I think I remember Finlay telling my that darwin
couldn't do _pthread_kill IIRC. So is there a work aroung to this?
¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
Justin F. Hallett
that was the config.log. It's strange alright.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Could be the configure check is failing for some other reason - check the
>config.log file.
¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
Justin F. Hallett
CAISnet Inc.
Could be the configure check is failing for some other reason - check the
config.log file.
-Jeff
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Justin Hallett wrote:
> I know and i checked there there...and i added
> --with-qt-include=/sw/include and still no dice, i just emailed the author
> see if he can help...seems
I know and i checked there there...and i added
--with-qt-include=/sw/include and still no dice, i just emailed the author
see if he can help...seems odd?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Those headers should be in /sw/include. Are they?
¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
Justi
Those headers should be in /sw/include. Are they?
-Jeff
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Justin Hallett wrote:
> Can i fix this?
>
> configure:8472: checking if Qt compiles without flags
> configure:8532: c++ -o conftest -g -O2 -I -I/sw/include -L/usr/X11R6/lib
> conftest.C -lqt-mt -lXext -lX11 1>&5
> co
Can i fix this?
configure:8472: checking if Qt compiles without flags
configure:8532: c++ -o conftest -g -O2 -I -I/sw/include -L/usr/X11R6/lib
conftest.C -lqt-mt -lXext -lX11 1>&5
conftest.C:2: qglobal.h: No such file or directory
conftest.C:3: qapplication.h: No such file or directory
conftest.
"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am currently spending some time in gdb with gnucash-1.6.5...
>
> Anyway, is it okay to symlink %p/share/gnucash/doc tp
> %p/share/doc/gnucash to provide the required docs? (I am asking
> because gnucash doesn't seem to be that broken, so I'
Hi,
I am currently spending some time in gdb with gnucash-1.6.5...
Anyway, is it okay to symlink %p/share/gnucash/doc tp
%p/share/doc/gnucash to provide the required docs? (I am asking
because gnucash doesn't seem to be that broken, so I'd hate to
"fix" it).
Also, this takes a long time to bu
28 matches
Mail list logo
