-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
should we maybe start to use this in our package's LDFLAGS? It might
make finding real errors easier, especially with packages like xfree,
where I get a *lot* of these warnings. I had wondered if there was an
option like this, and now I found it
Hi Jeremy. The line
Replaces: %n ( 1.2.2-2)
isn't actually needed, because a package is always free to Replace earlier
versions of itself.
Also, you should probably move
Depends: gnome-libs, gtkmm (= 1.2.8)
into the shlibs package. The reasoning is this: a user might uninstall the
main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How hard would it be to add code to perform x number of downloads at
once, where x is set in the config field? just wondering, for people who
have fast connections.
(would it be too hard to do for a perl beginner?)
- -chris zubrzycki
- - --
PGP
Well, 1.0 has been released :-)
April 19th 2002 seems to have been the release date.
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=15518release_id=25198
Peter
On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 04:12 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jin Zhao wrote:
Abiword is close to
I have made another group of splitoff packages for the shared libraries
project, deposited into the shared-libraries/splitoff module. I will
be moving these to the unstable tree after I have added the appropriate
BuildDepends entries to other packages, to make sure nothing breaks.
It might take
On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 06:21 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
should we maybe start to use this in our package's LDFLAGS? It might
make finding real errors easier, especially with packages like xfree,
where I get a *lot* of these warnings. I had wondered if there was an
option like
as far as I'm concerned if you can compile it, and run it why worry about
the warnings. I think it would be better to try and keep as close as the
author intended it to be.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would it be better to use the two-level namespace support of ld instead
of fighting against it?
At 8:39 Uhr -0600 23.04.2002, Eric Norum wrote:
On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 06:21 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
should we maybe start to use this in our package's LDFLAGS? It
might make finding real errors easier, especially with packages
like xfree, where I get a *lot* of these warnings. I
At 9:43 Uhr -0400 23.04.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How hard would it be to add code to perform x number of downloads at
once, where x is set in the config field? just wondering, for people
who have fast connections.
First, you would have to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I see what you mean. on a similer note, would it be difficult to make a
command- fink downloadinfo packages, or fink install --downloadinfo
packages, which would go through the beginning of the install process,
calculated missing dependencies, and
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Max Horn wrote:
At 9:43 Uhr -0400 23.04.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
How hard would it be to add code to perform x number of downloads at
once, where x is set in the config field? just wondering, for people
who have fast connections.
First, you would have to do
At 12:03 PM -0400 2002/04/23, Chris Devers wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Max Horn wrote:
At 9:43 Uhr -0400 23.04.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
How hard would it be to add code to perform x number of downloads at
once, where x is set in the config field? just wondering, for people
who
Max Horn wrote:
How hard would it be to add code to perform x number of downloads at
once, where x is set in the config field? just wondering, for people
who have fast connections.
First, you would have to do multiple process (forks). Then you have
to manage those somehow.
Now what do you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have seen this error and have had it myself before. I finally tracked
it down. I was going through the packages and wanted to give some a try,
but got the infamous fink Failed: Internal error: node for automake
already exists error. I added
Great! Now maybe this can be fixed.
(By the way, the syntax is = = = , and it's what we got from dpkg.
What's confusing is that == is NOT part of this.)
-- Dave
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was thinking for build depends anyway, maybe fink could irritate
itself and build the stuff that needs alder whatever, and then the
newer, or for certain packages, it could build/install itself, and then
revery back to the newer version, if that
16 matches
Mail list logo
