Re: [Fink-devel] fink-maintainer-gaim :: gaim >= 0.71 please

Am 09.01.2004 um 01:37 schrieb Lloyd Budd: Hi Max, Thank you for all the amazing work you do for all of us Fink users! I am wondering if we can get GAIM >= 0.71 in to stable (0.6.2) ? We can't get anything into 0.6.2 - that's a fixed release :-). As for gaim, look at http://fink.sourceforge.ne

[Fink-devel] fink-maintainer-gaim :: gaim >= 0.71 please

Hi Max, Thank you for all the amazing work you do for all of us Fink users! I am wondering if we can get GAIM >= 0.71 in to stable (0.6.2) ? With versions < 0.71 MSN does not work because MS changed the protocol back middle of October. Thank you, Lloyd D Budd

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods compress-zlib-pm.info,NONE,1.1 compress-zlib-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 dbd-mysql-pm.info,NONE,1.1 dbd-mysql-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 dbi-pm.info,NONE,1.1 dbi-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 html-parser-pm.info,NONE,1.1 html-parser-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 mime-base64-pm.info,NONE,1.1 mime-base64-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 scalar-list-utils-pm.info,NONE,1.1 scalar-list-utils-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-notex-pm.info,NONE,1.1 template-notex-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm-2.21-6.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm581-2.21-1.info,NONE,1.1 text-iconv-pm.info,NONE,1.1 text-iconv-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm560.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 unicode-string-pm.info,NONE,1.1 unicode-string-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 xml-parser-pm.info,NONE,1.1 xml-parser-pm581.info,NONE,1.1

Hi Dan. My current project is to try to ensure that everything which is in the 0.6.2 tree, appears in the 10.3/stable tree in a functional manner. Since these particular placeholder packages already exist in the 10.3/stable tree, my updates to them which provide perl 5.8.1 variants improves funct

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods template-notex-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm-2.21-7.info,NONE,1.1 compress-zlib-pm.info,1.3,1.4 dbd-mysql-pm.info,1.1,1.2 dbi-pm.info,1.1,1.2 html-parser-pm.info,1.3,1.4 mime-base64-pm.info,1.1,1.2 scalar-list-utils-pm.info,1.1,1.2 template-notex-pm.info,1.1,1.2 template-pm.info,1.1,1.2 text-iconv-pm.info,1.1,1.2 unicode-string-pm.info,1.1,1.2 xml-parser-pm.info,1.3,1.4

In gmane.os.apple.fink.cvs, you said: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods [...] > --- NEW FILE: template-notex-pm581.info --- > Package: template-notex-pm581 > Depends: appconfig-pm, perl580-core > BuildDepends: fink (>= 0.13.0-1), perl580-core Isn't it redund

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods compress-zlib-pm.info,NONE,1.1 compress-zlib-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 dbd-mysql-pm.info,NONE,1.1 dbd-mysql-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 dbi-pm.info,NONE,1.1 dbi-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 html-parser-pm.info,NONE,1.1 html-parser-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 mime-base64-pm.info,NONE,1.1 mime-base64-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 scalar-list-utils-pm.info,NONE,1.1 scalar-list-utils-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-notex-pm.info,NONE,1.1 template-notex-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm-2.21-6.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm581-2.21-1.info,NONE,1.1 text-iconv-pm.info,NONE,1.1 text-iconv-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm560.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 unicode-string-pm.info,NONE,1.1 unicode-string-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 xml-parser-pm.info,NONE,1.1 xml-parser-pm581.info,NONE,1.1

In gmane.os.apple.fink.cvs, you said: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods > In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv7049 > > Added Files: > compress-zlib-pm.info compress-zlib-pm581.info > dbd-mysql-pm.info dbd-mysql-pm581.info [snip, and more snips l

Re: [Fink-devel] non-core package submissions

On Jan 8, 2004, at 2:24 PM, William Scott wrote: Even very good writers benefit from a proof-reader. It is much easier to catch other people's mistakes than it is to catch your own. There are many others here who simply are much more competent with this stuff than I am. I am an experimental s

Re: [Fink-devel] Hey there, folks, it's tracker time again

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:12:17PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > Kevin Horton wrote: > > > >Yeah, I suspected the functionality of the package tracker was a good > >part of the problem. It really needs some sort of way to differentiate > >items that are waiting for the submitter to respond fro

Re: [Fink-devel] Hey there, folks, it's tracker time again

Kevin Horton wrote: Yeah, I suspected the functionality of the package tracker was a good part of the problem. It really needs some sort of way to differentiate items that are waiting for the submitter to respond from items that are waiting for an "official fink person" to tend to. But, I rea

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-config vs. 'fink --config' vs. ???

On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:18:14PM +0100, Max Horn wrote: > > Am 05.01.2004 um 18:51 schrieb Daniel Macks: > > >I want to have a way for arbitrary programs to learn about fink's > >pathname configs. Some kind of config script that would return things > >like '/sw'. What would be a desireable way

Re: [Fink-devel] non-core package submissions

On Jan 7, 2004, at 11:39 PM, D. Höhn wrote: you should simply ask for a CVS account. I think this is in the pipeline currently, but I plan to use this only with caution (see below). I am sure you are more than capable of taking care of your packages. ... since you have maitained packages for a

Re: [Fink-devel] Conflict between sodipodi and scite

Le 8 janv. 2004, à 13:11, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:09:59PM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Le 8 janv. 2004, ? 12:06, Martin Costabel a ?crit : On 8 janv. 2004, at 11:45, Mich?le Garoche wrote: dpkg : error /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/editors/ scite_1.57

Re: [Fink-devel] Hey there, folks, it's tracker time again

At 14:41 +0100 8/1/04, Max Horn wrote: Am 08.01.2004 um 04:39 schrieb Daniel Macks: On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:16:02PM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote: At 20:35 -0500 7/1/04, you wrote: How about subscribing to the fink trackers mailing list and have procmail call a script that updates your thing based

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.509,1.510 Validation.pm,1.93,1.94

Am 08.01.2004 um 16:06 schrieb TheSin: not sure I wanted a Co-Maintainer field but was told to list them both, and just cause the PDB ignores it, doesn't make it wrong, maybe the docs sure be revised along with the pdb? So packages need more then one maintainer IMHO Having two maintainer for a

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.509,1.510 Validation.pm,1.93,1.94

not sure I wanted a Co-Maintainer field but was told to list them both, and just cause the PDB ignores it, doesn't make it wrong, maybe the docs sure be revised along with the pdb? So packages need more then one maintainer IMHO --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.509,1.510 Validation.pm,1.93,1.94

Against the documentation. Second (and I suppose subsequent) maintainers are ignored by the PDB. How does Fink Commander (in particular the feedback mechanism) deal with such a case? dan On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:49:29AM -0700, TheSin wrote: > What about co maintained pkgs? > > On 8-Jan-04, at

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.509,1.510 Validation.pm,1.93,1.94

What about co maintained pkgs? --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 8-Jan-04, at 7:09 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv3215 Modified Files: ChangeLog Validation.pm Log M

Re: [Fink-devel] Hey there, folks, it's tracker time again

Am 08.01.2004 um 04:39 schrieb Daniel Macks: On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:16:02PM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote: At 20:35 -0500 7/1/04, you wrote: How about subscribing to the fink trackers mailing list and have procmail call a script that updates your thing based on that? Given that the messages are in

Re: [Fink-devel] Conflict between sodipodi and scite

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:09:59PM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote: > Le 8 janv. 2004, ? 12:06, Martin Costabel a ?crit : > >On 8 janv. 2004, at 11:45, Mich?le Garoche wrote: > >>dpkg : error > >>/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/editors/ > >>scite_1.57-12_darwin-powerpc.deb (--in

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages depending on db4 and db41

Christian Schaffner wrote: > Dear Package Maintainers > > Sleepycat released a new version of its Berkeley DB, version 4.2. It is > binary compatible with version 4.1 and 4.0 according to > > This page says nothing about binary compatibility. Sle

[Fink-devel] Packages depending on db4 and db41

Dear Package Maintainers Sleepycat released a new version of its Berkeley DB, version 4.2. It is binary compatible with version 4.1 and 4.0 according to but fixes some serious bugs on MacOS X with more than one processor. From

Re: [Fink-devel] Conflict between sodipodi and scite

Le 8 janv. 2004, à 12:06, Martin Costabel a écrit : On 8 janv. 2004, at 11:45, Michèle Garoche wrote: dpkg : error /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/editors/ scite_1.57-12_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install) : try to replace directory /sw/share/pixmaps in package sodipodi with an

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink INSTALL.html,1.14,1.15 README.html,1.9,1.10 USAGE.html,1.10,1.11

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:39:05PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote: > > Once again, how to commit doc changes: step 1) commit XML file, 2) run 'make && > > make install' again, 3) commit HTML/PHP files > > I have just one small thing to add: sometimes, you also need step 1.5: > run 'touch foo.xml'

[Fink-devel] Conflict between sodipodi and scite

I post here as I don't know where is the problem exactly. In an attempt to help porting cssed (which use scintilla) and resolved a link problem, I've discovered the scite.info file. Hence I run fink install scite to get a trace of the scintilla compiling part. I have sodipodi already installe

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb failed, exit code 10 or 11

D. Höhn wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Martin Costabel wrote: | D. Höhn wrote: | [] | |> Xould you provide a Q/A pait ? I will check it into the FAQ as soon as I |> have it and it has been verified here | | | As soon as someone has an idea what to put into the "A" part

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb failed, exit code 10 or 11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Martin Costabel wrote: | D. Höhn wrote: | [] | |> Xould you provide a Q/A pait ? I will check it into the FAQ as soon as I |> have it and it has been verified here | | | As soon as someone has an idea what to put into the "A" part :-) | I haven't.

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb failed, exit code 10 or 11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Costabel wrote: | I am forwarding a message from today's fink-users list here, in the hope | that someone with better memory or better insight knows the source of | this problem. | | This has been coming come up very regularly, I find about a doz

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb failed, exit code 10 or 11

D. Höhn wrote: [] Xould you provide a Q/A pait ? I will check it into the FAQ as soon as I have it and it has been verified here As soon as someone has an idea what to put into the "A" part :-) I haven't. -- Martin --- This SF.net email is spo

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb failed, exit code 10 or 11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Martin Costabel wrote: | I am forwarding a message from today's fink-users list here, in the hope | that someone with better memory or better insight knows the source of | this problem. | | This has been coming come up very regularly, I find about

[Fink-devel] dpkg-deb failed, exit code 10 or 11

I am forwarding a message from today's fink-users list here, in the hope that someone with better memory or better insight knows the source of this problem. This has been coming come up very regularly, I find about a dozen complaints like this in the past two months, and it should certainly be

Re: [Fink-devel] non-core package submissions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Here's a heretical thought: | | I've never been 100 % convinced that most of the stuff I have submitted | even belongs in fink. | | Much of it is rather specialized, like programs for X-ray | crystallography and other ty

[Fink-devel] non-core package submissions

Here's a heretical thought: I've never been 100 % convinced that most of the stuff I have submitted even belongs in fink. Much of it is rather specialized, like programs for X-ray crystallography and other types of biophysics techniques. These programs have a very specialized user community, and