Re: [Fink-devel] broken autogen

2015-02-02 Thread David Fang
ough the > fields of the Cflags reported from guile-2.0.pc and find > the libguile header include regardless of its position. > Jack > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:16 PM, David Fang wrote: >> Jack, >> >> Ahh, I responded too soon. Thanks for triaging this issue

Re: [Fink-devel] broken autogen

2015-01-31 Thread David Fang
the homebrew and MacPorts packaging for 5.18.4 avoids >>>> any patching... >>>> >>>> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Formula/autogen.rb >>>> https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/devel/autogen/Portfile >>>> >>&g

Re: [Fink-devel] broken autogen

2015-01-31 Thread David Fang
h Slashdot Media, is your > hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought > leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a > look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > ___ >

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-08 Thread David Fang
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote: >> Alex, >> >> > On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang wrote: >> > >> > > Hi all, >> > > Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-08 Thread David Fang
Alex, > On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang wrote: > >> Hi all, >> Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging >> that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib >> validation because the install_names for shl

[Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-04 Thread David Fang
comment on the status/issues/obstacles? Such a fix would unblock llvm35 from hitting dists. Thanks! Fang -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- ___ Fink-devel ma

Re: [Fink-devel] hot fixes for yosemite

2014-10-27 Thread David Fang
- 10.[[012]]*) >>> >>> + 10.[[012]][[,.]]*) >>> >>> _lt_dar_allow_undefined='${wl}-flat_namespace ${wl}-undefined >>> ${wl}suppress' ;; >>> &g

Re: [Fink-devel] clang34/llvm34 built on Yosemite Beta

2014-08-29 Thread David Fang
em header path should only matter in stage 1 of the bootstrap, but I'm making a huge assumption that the same paths don't wind up somewhere in the C++ driver code. This just requires investigation on my part. My hope is that C++ headers are part

Re: [Fink-devel] clang34/llvm34 built on Yosemite Beta

2014-08-26 Thread David Fang
Hi John, Great to hear! > I've been working with David Fang to get the clang34/llvm34 compiler > suite to build under Yosemite Public Beta. Thanks to a recent patch by > Jack Howarth (languages/llvm34-openmp-cmake.patch; 2014-08-15) these > large packages now build,

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm34 testsuite

2014-05-22 Thread David Fang
py", line 1308, in _execute_child raise child_exception OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Testing Time: 0.01s Unresolved Tests (1): LLVM :: Analysis/BasicAA/2003-09-1

Re: [Fink-devel] purging r-cran-* files from 10.7

2014-05-14 Thread David Fang
ackages is documented to be used. dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly ru

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm-gcc42 conflicts with ccache-default

2013-10-30 Thread David Fang
ilers for any given distribution. There are two uses of ccache-default, for fink's builds, and for the user. I almost think that path-prefix-ccache would be more suitable for fink builds, than providing overrides directly in %p/bin. I am entirely open to suggestions. Fang -- David Fang http://ww

Re: [Fink-devel] [gtk+2, 10.4] missing text issues

2013-04-16 Thread David Fang
had to > recompile gtk+2 of course and everything else that had been linked to 1.12, > but i do now have fonts. Tested with xchat and geany. > > > Whee! > -Mike -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ ---

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink graphviz 2.26.3-6 build fails on 10.8.2

2013-01-09 Thread David Fang
artz, the successor to X11.app. > > As suggested on SO, this symlink fixes the build: > >> ln -s /opt/X11/include/X11 /usr/local/include/X11 > > I'm guessing that a simple patch to the package, adding the real location to > the include directory search list, sho

Re: [Fink-devel] pidgin for osx 10.7?

2012-01-19 Thread David Fang
oolkit. >> >> All three of these, and pidgin itself, built for me on 10.7 this evening. >> >> -- Dave >> >> >> On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Fang wrote: >> >>>> Hi, sorry to bother you, I was just wondering when there might be a fink

Re: [Fink-devel] pidgin for osx 10.7?

2012-01-13 Thread David Fang
Hi Dave, Just a ping. What's the status of these? Fang > The dependent packages not yet in 10.7 are: farsight2, libnice, and > silc-toolkit. > > All three of these, and pidgin itself, built for me on 10.7 this evening. > > -- Dave > > > On Jan 4, 20

Re: [Fink-devel] pidgin for osx 10.7?

2012-01-04 Thread David Fang
r me on 10.7 this evening. > > -- Dave > > > On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Fang wrote: > >>> Hi, sorry to bother you, I was just wondering when there might be a fink >>> package for 10.7. thanks! >> >> Hi, >> I still don't have a

Re: [Fink-devel] pidgin for osx 10.7?

2012-01-04 Thread David Fang
someone try linking/copying pidgin.info from the 10.4 tree and see if it "just works" on 10.7? To checkout the 10.4 tree on 10.7, just edit /sw/etc/fink.conf: SelfUpdateTrees: 10.7 10.4 and re-selfupdate. Fang -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ ht

Re: [Fink-devel] libmpfr4-shlibs : assertion failure on Fink install

2011-10-11 Thread David Fang
lvm30 without regressions. I > strongly suspect this will > also fix the issues you are seeing with clang from Xcode 4.2. >Jack > ps I have opened up http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1 to alert the > clang developers of > this problem. >

Re: [Fink-devel] libmpfr4-shlibs : assertion failure on Fink install

2011-10-10 Thread David Fang
nformation: >> > Package manager version: 0.31.2 >> > Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Sat Oct 8 10:48:20 2011, 10.7, >> > x86_64 >> > Trees: local/main stable/main >> > Xcode: 4.2 >> > >> > % gcc --version >> > i686

Re: [Fink-devel] gc-7-1001 and Lion

2011-07-22 Thread David Fang
Also, I confirmed that InfoTest on powerpc-darwin8 passes its tests, but with some (perhaps expected?) noise: http://paste.lisp.org/display/123443 Ok for me to update gc in 10.4-EOL, with: InfoTest: TestScript: make -k check || exit 2 ? Fang > Dave, > FYI, David Fang asked me to t

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm-gcc gmp fix

2011-05-16 Thread David Fang
llvm-gcc. I have attached a patch for this > change > for inclusion in the gmp5-5.0.2 package. >Jack > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -- Achieve unpreced

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem with Fink ppl-0.10.2-4 and system-java-dev

2011-04-08 Thread David Fang
nks it is missing. fink-core, what else could be wrong? Are there specific files he should check for? Fang On Dec 29, 2010, at 18:47 , David Fang wrote: You're welcome! Happy New Year too! Hi Fang, yes you were right. I'm sure I had this installed to start with, but somehow it

Re: [Fink-devel] [PPL-devel] ppl-0.10.2 check thorough test fail

2011-04-01 Thread David Fang
an at least patch the test case to work with glpk >= 4.29 (and require said version in our TestDepends), and move on from there. Is this test also present in ppl-0.11.x? Will it require the same adjustment? Fang David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/

Re: [Fink-devel] [PPL-devel] ppl-0.10.2 check thorough test fail

2011-04-01 Thread David Fang
rmat as well as the changelog for glpk. I have glpk-4.44: fang@fangbook 6> fink list -t glpk Information about 10198 packages read in 9 seconds. i glpk4.44-1 GNU Linear Programming Kit i glpk-dev4.44-1 GNU Linear Programming Kit glpk-java 4.19-1

Re: [Fink-devel] [PPL-devel] ppl-0.10.2 check thorough test fail

2011-04-01 Thread David Fang
> Il 29/03/2011 02:39, David Fang ha scritto: >> Hello, >> With ppl-0.10.2, several Mac OS X fink users (including myself) have >> observed the following single test failure on 10.5 and 10.6, using >> Apple's gcc-4.2, arch i686-apple-darwin{9,10}, with thorou

Re: [Fink-devel] [PPL-devel] ppl-0.10.2 check thorough test fail

2011-03-29 Thread David Fang
Hi, Adding fink-devel. > On 03/29/11 02:39, David Fang wrote: >> With ppl-0.10.2, several Mac OS X fink users (including myself) have >> observed the following single test failure on 10.5 and 10.6, using Apple's >> gcc-4.2, arch i686-apple-darwin{9,10}, w

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.10.2-4 fails tests on 10.5/i386

2011-03-28 Thread David Fang
ailures introduced by Xcode 4.0 that might get > fixed > as well. Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear. Above, I was just asking about ppl:gmp5, nothing about ppl9. Fang David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.10.2-4 fails tests on 10.5/i386

2011-03-28 Thread David Fang
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:36:44PM -0400, David Fang wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:28:04AM -0400, David Fang wrote: >>>>> It was originally thought that the failure was due to 10.5 using >>>>> gcc-4.0, but the test still fails the same way w

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.10.2-4 fails tests on 10.5/i386

2011-03-23 Thread David Fang
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:28:04AM -0400, David Fang wrote: >>> It was originally thought that the failure was due to 10.5 using >>> gcc-4.0, but the test still fails the same way with revision -4 which >>> forces gcc-4.2. >>> >>> For the record,

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.10.2-4 fails tests on 10.5/i386

2011-03-23 Thread David Fang
ently discussed a strategy for upgrading the gmp/mpfr/mpc/ppl/cloog dependencies offline. Jack, care to summarize? Fang David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -- Enable your software for

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.10.2-4 fails tests on 10.5/i386

2011-03-23 Thread David Fang
the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > ___ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription managemen

Re: [Fink-devel] problem installing atlas

2011-03-15 Thread David Fang
gt; make[1]: *** [build] Error 255 > make: *** [build] Error 2 > ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.yfHGVX failed, exit code 2 > Removing runtime build-lock... > Removing build-lock package... > /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-atlas-3.9.11-1 > (Reading database ... 12767 file

Re: [Fink-devel] guile20 / macos 10.5

2011-02-28 Thread David Fang
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEUEARECAAYFAk1rlJwACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/xSgCdGwWBq2Iy8mE/n9bKNs7Shvlf > /qAAmLH2SEYRuySTNLIgrFBQyvxj7+w= > =EFP7 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://

Re: [Fink-devel] GMP build issues

2011-02-25 Thread David Fang
d 5664) > > uname -a: > Darwin Wastrel-iTabletPC.local 10.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.5.0: Fri Nov > 26 20:52:27 EST 2010; legacy kernel v5 :xnu-1504.9.17/BUILD/obj/RELEASE_I386 > i386 > > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, David Fang wrote: > >> Hi, >>That&

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-5 build failure

2011-01-18 Thread David Fang
sion: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >>> >>> iEYEARECAAYFAk0zkeUACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+6OACbBCU0ppC7q3BkQ1LXoRQxZUOl >>> vwQAoJgexJaS6BIqKRBpC5RuTTclRmcb >&

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-5 build failure

2011-01-18 Thread David Fang
oJgexJaS6BIqKRBpC5RuTTclRmcb >> =U8Zb >> -END PGP SIGNATURE- >> >> -- >> Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks >> Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them.

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc45-4.5.2-1000

2011-01-17 Thread David Fang
g/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -- Protect Your Site and C

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-5 build failure

2011-01-17 Thread David Fang
nd customers by using code signing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > ___ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.10.2-3

2010-11-22 Thread David Fang
re if this goes to you or the fink maintainer? > > Please let me know if you need any more info I can provide. > > Thanks, > > Russ Walasek > > David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ --

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink ppl update errors

2010-11-19 Thread David Fang
> Mac OSX 10.6.5 > No extra update in java except standard OS update. The last Java update from removed those headers, unfortunately. The FAQ entry instructs you to download/install the Java Development Package from connect.apple.com (free registration) under the Java section. That will provide

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-1:0.10.2-3

2010-11-18 Thread David Fang
de version: 3.2.4 > gcc version: 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664) > make version: 3.81 > Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander > David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -- Beautiful is wri

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1

2010-11-17 Thread David Fang
Hi all, (responses embedded below) > On 15 Nov 2010, at 13:06, Charles Lepple wrote: > >> On Nov 14, 2010, at 11:57 PM, David Fang wrote: >> >>> There isn't anything we can do about Apple's decision, unfortunately. >>> Unless you actuall

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1

2010-11-14 Thread David Fang
in the future. Fang > On 11/8/10 9:29 PM, David Fang wrote: >> Hi James, >> This is a frequently reported issue (new item of >> http://www.finkproject.org/): The latest Apple update of Java resulted in >> removed headers which represent system-java-dev. Please

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1, cloog-ppl and gcc

2010-11-12 Thread David Fang
moving runtime build-lock... > Removing build-lock package... > /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-ppl-0.10.2-2 > (Reading database ... 7650 files and directories currently installed.) > Removing fink-buildlock-ppl-0.10.2-2 ... > Failed: phase installing: ppl-shlibs-0.1

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1, cloog-ppl and gcc

2010-11-10 Thread David Fang
ltiple libraries in a -shlibs call one the > "primary" one. > > On 11/10/10 2:13 PM, David Fang wrote: >> Supposedly fixed ppl.info (++%e, --%v) is updated in my experimental/. >> Please verify this fix. >> >>> Apologies, fixing today! >>> >> On 1

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1, cloog-ppl and gcc

2010-11-10 Thread David Fang
ink User Liaison >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAkzamKkACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ8bGACgpwyiOBuSJPsriruI5Eik6oI4 >> h+0Anj61IfAT0ZyR1hw0r6mxwKtX5ge0 >

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1, cloog-ppl and gcc

2010-11-10 Thread David Fang
der Hansen, Ph.D. > Fink User Liaison > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkzamKkACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ8bGACgpwyiO

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1

2010-11-09 Thread David Fang
> and Quantum Optics > > Dipartimento di Fisica ``A. Volta'', > via Bassi 6, I-27100 Pavia, Italy > > email:dari...@unipv.it > tel:+39 0382 987 484 > fax:+39 0382 987 793 > mobile:+39 347 0329998 > skype: giacomo_mauro_dariano > AIM: dariano13 > > W

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1

2010-11-08 Thread David Fang
Mon Nov 8 19:58:52 2010, 10.6, i386 > Mac OS X version: 10.6.4 > Xcode version: 3.2.4 > gcc version: 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664) > make version: 3.81 > Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander > David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ --

[Fink-devel] llvm 10.4/ppc build fail

2010-09-01 Thread David Fang
time build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-llvm-2.5-1 (Reading database ... 197421 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-llvm-2.5-1 ... Failed: phase installing: llvm-2.5-1 failed Fang David Fang http://www.csl.co

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc 4.5.1 released

2010-08-14 Thread David Fang
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And you got an error with the prior iteration (no dwarf2) ? >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc 4.5.1 released

2010-08-13 Thread David Fang
hallenge >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> ___ >> Fink-devel mailing list >> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel >> Subscription management: >> https://lists.sourc

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp build failure

2010-05-10 Thread David Fang
Great! Thus committed to unstable. Now I just hope that no more issues crop up... > On May 10, 2010, at 1:11 PM, David Fang wrote: > >> Looks like same issue. I just committed the same workaround over to my >> experimental gmp5.info. Can someone again confirm that thi

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp build failure

2010-05-10 Thread David Fang
Looks like same issue. I just committed the same workaround over to my experimental gmp5.info. Can someone again confirm that this works? Thanks. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 5/10/10 1:29 PM, David Fang wrote: >>> I can confirm that gmp compil

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp build failure

2010-05-10 Thread David Fang
either one would do. David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -- ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gma

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp build failure

2010-05-10 Thread David Fang
to test on. http://fink.cvs.sf.net/viewvc/fink/experimental/fangism/finkinfo/ Can anyone one confirm whether or not gmp5 needs the same workaround on gmp5? fangism David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http:/

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp5-5.0.1-3 now fails

2010-05-09 Thread David Fang
ckage... > /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-3 > (Reading database ... 204201 files and directories currently installed.) > Removing fink-buildlock-gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-3 ... > &

[Fink-devel] gmp5-5.0.1-3 now fails

2010-05-09 Thread David Fang
xecution of /var/tmp/tmp.5.BObueE failed, exit code 2 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-3 (Reading database ... 204201 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-3 ... Davi

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp build failure

2010-05-09 Thread David Fang
]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > > > -- > > ___ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists

[Fink-devel] firefox3-10.4: call for testers

2010-04-09 Thread David Fang
perimental/fangism/finkinfo/ firefox3-10.4.{info,patch} fangism David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- Download IntelĀ® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proact

Re: [Fink-devel] gnucash2

2009-09-29 Thread David Fang
What ever happened to that script you wrote to regenerate Apple's X11 .la files? I think I have a copy lying around somewhere. Would that work? Fang David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ --

Re: [Fink-devel] ffmpeg

2009-09-29 Thread David Fang
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > ___ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription man

Re: [Fink-devel] i386-apple-darwin target depreciated

2009-09-27 Thread David Fang
nce upstream > will have little sympathy if our target breaks. Sad as we just fixed the > P1 that was threatening the primary target status yesterday. No one of the remaining powerpc-apple-darwin8 hold-outs, Fang David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http:

Re: [Fink-devel] fink: fluidsynth patch update

2009-09-13 Thread David Fang
st the same in the aforementioned sections), but without trying to build fluidsynth. Does fluidsynth build cleanly on 10.5? It looks like the preprocessor definitions will interfere with the enum definition... > I'll get back to you on this ASAP and many thanks for s

Re: [Fink-devel] fink: fluidsynth patch update

2009-09-13 Thread David Fang
t; would be difficult presently to do this. But with the last two remaining bits > of the information requested above, maybe I could suggest some kind of > resolution. You can consider me among the few who are trying to keep powerpc-darwin8 alive. :D I do have an Intel Macbook on 10.5, but

Re: [Fink-devel] fink: fluidsynth patch update

2009-09-13 Thread David Fang
sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2857895&group_id=17203&atid=414256 >> >> Could you please review and approve? >> Thank you! Fang David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/

Re: [Fink-devel] graphviz-nox prospects

2009-07-12 Thread David Fang
ested, and for now explicitly disabled gts/devil/lasi until -nox is more polished. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2810042&group_id=17203&atid=414256 Once this is in decent shape, I'll work on -plugins to separate out the extension languag

Re: [Fink-devel] graphviz-nox prospects

2009-06-28 Thread David Fang
gh some API. (I can't say with 100% certainty because I haven't used them.) So technically, there could exist an x11 version without language bindings, which would make a two-level varian

Re: [Fink-devel] graphviz-nox prospects

2009-06-28 Thread David Fang
7;all' language plug-ins) graphviz (with x11, gtk+pangocairo, all the fixins Fang) David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -- ___ Fink-devel mailing

Re: [Fink-devel] graphviz-nox prospects

2009-06-21 Thread David Fang
ariant packaging are happening here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2810042&group_id=17203&atid=414256 fangism David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ --

[Fink-devel] graphviz-nox prospects

2009-06-21 Thread David Fang
I'm armed with the packaging manual and some examples (emacs22.info, vim.info). I need a little advice on which dependencies I can drop for -nox. For example, can I remove all of the gnome, gtk, pango, cairo deps? 'fangism' David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang

Re: [Fink-devel] framework flag munged by libtool?

2009-02-07 Thread David Fang
> Offending file: /sw/lib/finch/gntclipboard.la > Offending line: inherited_linker_flags=' -framework IOKit > [...more of the same...] > Removing runtime build-lock... > Removing build-lock package... > Any idea how to fix? > Thanks

[Fink-devel] framework flag munged by libtool?

2009-02-07 Thread David Fang
ildlock-pidgin-2.5.4-1 (Reading database ... 177473 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-pidgin-2.5.4-1 ... Updating the list of locally available binary packages. Scanning dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc Any idea how to fix? Th

Re: [Fink-devel] The Pangocairo Has Landed

2008-07-16 Thread David Fang
viz's package to the old one (1.16-x) while I sort this out. (I'm still incrementally updating all packages each day...) Fang > Another problem is that there are still quite a few packages, among them > the central pango1-xft2-ft219 itself, that do not build on an xmk

[Fink-devel] openssl MD5?

2008-07-14 Thread David Fang
ect? should the package's md5 be updated? Fang David Fang Computer Systems Laboratory Electrical & Computer Engineering Cornell University http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!) ---

Re: [Fink-devel] The Pangocairo Has Landed

2008-07-14 Thread David Fang
an unfortunate situation that was unavoidable due to the > upstream pango and gtk changes). Fang David Fang Computer Systems Laboratory Electrical & Computer Engineering Cornell University http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)

Re: [Fink-devel] validation question

2008-03-30 Thread David Fang
w the package validates with the .dylibs as private libs. I plan to work with the author on automake-libtoolizing this project in the future, so hopefully that will make this sort of maintainence easier. Thanks for the help. Fang David Fang Computer System

Re: [Fink-devel] validation question

2008-03-26 Thread David Fang
ackage is in bad shape -- it's trying to build and manage shared libraries without the help of libtool, which would take care of this -install_name problem (among other issues). I'll try to work with the lead developer on fixing this. David Fang Computer Systems Laborator

Re: [Fink-devel] validation question

2008-03-26 Thread David Fang
an upstream bug in the package too > (similar to what dbreiser saw a week or so ago), where a library has a > "simple filename" install_name instead of the full path to it. So it looks like we only get a simple filename, no full path. What corrective action should be taken? I only

Re: [Fink-devel] validation question

2008-03-26 Thread David Fang
he Shlibs field. ... but I've done exactly that in Shlibs (no whitespace). [puzzled look] Any help is appreciated. Thanks. David Fang Computer Systems Laboratory Electrical & Computer Engineering Cornell University http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? l

Re: [Fink-devel] libmpfr1-2.3.0-1 still on fink tracking

2007-11-21 Thread David Fang
2.2, which has better support for Intel than 4.2.1? I helped Torbjorn (author) with a lot of testing on all the x86/ppc platforms I could get my hands on, with some pleasant results. Some of our findings are summarized here: http://gmplib.org/macos.html David Fang Computer Systems Lab

Re: [Fink-devel] Tracker hiatus

2007-10-30 Thread David Fang
aid=1773187&group_id=17203&atid=414256 I also noticed that upstream just bumped up a version with a security fix, so I'll update accordingly in the next day or two. Thanks in advance. David Fang Computer Systems Laboratory Electrical & Computer Engineering Cornell University http:

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem with pidgin package on the tracker

2007-09-03 Thread David Fang
I don't have an immaculate fink setup to play with.) Will re-post at the tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1773187&group_id=17203&atid=414256 'fangism' David Fang Computer Systems Laboratory Electrical & Computer Engineering Cornell Un

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

2007-03-04 Thread David Fang
kage... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-gcc42-4.1.-20070221 (Reading database ... 57360 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-gcc42-4.1.-20070221 ... Failed: can't create package gcc42_4.1.-20070221_darwin-i386.deb David Fang Computer Syst

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

2007-03-04 Thread David Fang
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, David Fang wrote: > > Because mysql takes not so much time to build compared to gcc4, I > > tried that one first with the new tar. On my system it build and > > installed without an error. Right now I am building gcc4. Once that > > is done in a couple

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

2007-03-04 Thread David Fang
aused by > > tar-1.16.1 claiming > > > > "file changed as we read it" > > > > please help with debugging this? Based on the outcome of these > > tests, we should be able to decide whether we need to patch tar or > > dpkg, or whether we need to

Re: [Fink-devel] fink and 'make -j numproc'

2007-02-25 Thread David Fang
e users environment (/init.[c]sh) would be a good policy. Even if this doesn't happen, it's not the end of the world, it's documented for the ones who search for the solution. End $.02. David Fang Computer Systems Laboratory Elect

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 mixed result

2007-01-28 Thread David Fang
> Spotlight does not touch *.build directories. That's why fink.build was > introduced in the first place. Maybe the people who have this weird > error changed their build directory to something other than fink.build? Martin, Ahhh... [me: starts renaming all his project build directories]

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 mixed result

2007-01-28 Thread David Fang
> So if I understand all of the comments so far, the problem may > be avoidable with an older tar but even that produces warnings in > fink. If the hypothesis of Spotlight indexing blocking files > is correct, perhaps the answer is for the fink developers to add > code to fink that stops and st

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 mixed result

2007-01-27 Thread David Fang
> > dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070124 > > /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/languages > > dpkg-deb: building package `gcc42' in > > `/sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/languages/ > > gcc42_4.1.-20070124_darwin-i386.deb'. > > tar: > > ./sw/lib/gcc4.2/include/c++/4

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 mixed result

2007-01-27 Thread David Fang
> > dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070124 > > /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/languages > > dpkg-deb: building package `gcc42' in > > `/sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/languages/ > > gcc42_4.1.-20070124_darwin-i386.deb'. > > tar: > > ./sw/lib/gcc4.2/include/c++/4

[Fink-devel] gcc42 mixed result

2007-01-27 Thread David Fang
-cf then failed, the .deb halted and the entire build process was wasted in the end. I repeated this once more today and got the same result. Anyone care to shed some light? I can provide other information upon request. Thanks in advance. Fang David Fang Computer Systems Laboratory Electrical &

Re: [Fink-devel] What feature would you like to see in fink/Fink?

2006-12-05 Thread David Fang
> Charles Lepple wrote: > > On 12/4/06, Robert T Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Cool! I think the simplest implementation would be to send a successful > >> build or install message to the maintainer Hi, I also like this idea, but I think any build reports should also include the e

Re: [Fink-devel] libmpfr1, libmpfr1-64bit and gcc42

2006-11-30 Thread David Fang
64bit package both based on this weeks 2.2.1 > release. It would be nice to get those into fink 10.4 unstable as > well. FWIW, I tested these out RC-1 (make check) on the various Macs I have around, and all their tests passed. Looks good. Thanks again for all the maintainence work on the

Re: [Fink-devel] What feature would you like to see in fink/Fink?

2006-11-24 Thread David Fang
> > When the user decides to remove a packet he installed, fink should be > > able to remove packets that are no longer necessary. > > I can see one obvious problem with such a feature, which has already bitten > me using aptitude under Debian (has this built in). Package A has a > dependency cause

Re: [Fink-devel] 64bit libraries and a new percent expansion

2006-11-22 Thread David Fang
Heh, nevermind, found the 64bit-cpu package... as mentioned in other reply! *hides* - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions

Re: [Fink-devel] 64bit libraries and a new percent expansion

2006-11-22 Thread David Fang
o test64 % ./test64 > /dev/null 2>&1 the execution will fail if 64-bit is unsupported. Does this suffice? I was able to test an early draft of your gcc4 packaging that way (back when we wanted to conditionally --disable-multilib). Maybe even useful as a pseudo-package for 64b dep

Re: [Fink-devel] fink vs. the alternatives

2006-11-09 Thread David Fang
tree? (Instead of: "Edit /sw/etc/fink.conf as root using your favorite text editor, and insert the following magic words on line...") Fang David Fang Computer Systems Laboratory Electrical & Computer Engineering Cornell University http://www.csl

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 4.2 test packaging

2006-10-28 Thread David Fang
/gcc-4.2-20061024/ > > libgfortran/configure: line 6504: `GCC_HEADER_STDINT(gstdint.h)' > > > > 6510 GCC_HEADER_STDINT(gstdint.h) > > aclocal was not given the correct -I options. It did not find the >

  1   2   >