I will now tag the package CVS for 0.3.2a, and begin testing /
building the release. If you have any concerns or want to have some
changes absolutly in, contact me directly, and do it *now*. In
emergencies, you can reach me in our IRC channel (#fink on
irc.openprojects.net, just say something
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 06:30 pm, Max Horn wrote:
> At 18:20 Uhr + 15.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>> On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 10:41 pm, Max Horn wrote:
>>
>>> Also, is it a good idea to use 0.3.2a (originally I thought this was
>>> good to indicate only small things chan
At 18:20 Uhr + 15.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 10:41 pm, Max Horn wrote:
>
>>Also, is it a good idea to use 0.3.2a (originally I thought this
>>was good to indicate only small things changed), or should we
>>rather use 0.3.3? I am still tending more to 0.3.
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 10:41 pm, Max Horn wrote:
> Also, is it a good idea to use 0.3.2a (originally I thought this was
> good to indicate only small things changed), or should we rather use
> 0.3.3? I am still tending more to 0.3.2a, but I am certainly open on
> suggestions :)
'a'
I think tomorrow is fine for a release, and 0.3.2a makes sense as a number.
-- Dave
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
So,
what do you guys think, should I try to release tomorrow 0.3.2a - or
maybe wait one or two days more?
Also, is it a good idea to use 0.3.2a (originally I thought this was
good to indicate only small things changed), or should we rather use
0.3.3? I am still tending more to 0.3.2a, but I
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 10:47 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> Apple is claiming to work towards POSIX, but so far I haven't seen
>> much on that front. But actually, I'd prefer if they would finally
>> fixing some of the really bad errors and shortcomings in the Unix
>> part of OS X (like
At 22:30 Uhr + 13.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 10:21 pm, Max Horn wrote:
>
>>Apple is claiming to work towards POSIX, but so far I haven't seen
>>much on that front.
>
>They have claimed that? When? In fact, I think I've heard them claim
>quite the opposite
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Max Horn wrote:
> At 11:06 Uhr -0800 13.01.2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
> >
> >> Goddamn Apple for removing gnutar in OS X (even if it was only in the
> >> Developer Tools... grrr).
> >
> >Yeah... I love how the Darwin system is e
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 10:21 pm, Max Horn wrote:
> Apple is claiming to work towards POSIX, but so far I haven't seen much
> on that front.
They have claimed that? When? In fact, I think I've heard them claim
quite the opposite: that they don't care about being POSIX compliant,
jus
At 11:06 Uhr -0800 13.01.2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>
>> Darwin's tar is BSD tar, and BSD tar behaves differently from GNU tar
>> when it comes to long file names. I think it can cope with them, though,
>> if the archive is created with BSD tar in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
