On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 02:26 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 14:24 Uhr -0700 24.04.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
>> At 8:59 AM -0600 4/24/02, Justin Hallett wrote:
>>> I think the only real reason there to release >0.4 is the bootstrap
>>> fail.
>>> It's the only issue that could potentially rende
At 14:24 Uhr -0700 24.04.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
>At 8:59 AM -0600 4/24/02, Justin Hallett wrote:
>>I think the only real reason there to release >0.4 is the bootstrap fail.
>>It's the only issue that could potentially render fink unusable for some
>>new users. Don't get me wrong I think the other
At 8:59 AM -0600 4/24/02, Justin Hallett wrote:
>I think the only real reason there to release >0.4 is the bootstrap fail.
>It's the only issue that could potentially render fink unusable for some
>new users. Don't get me wrong I think the other problems should be fixed
As opposed to the passwd
At 19:21 Uhr +0200 24.04.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
>On mercredi, avril 24, 2002, at 03:28 , Max Horn wrote:
>
>>There were some issues that made us consider getting out quickly a
>>0.4.0a release. Like for example:
>>
>>* dangerous problem in passwd
>>* broken libmpeg
>>* broken r-base
>>* sou
At 11:39 Uhr -0400 24.04.2002, Chris Devers wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Max Horn wrote:
>
>> * gdk-pixbuf doesn't build correctl the first time it's built
>
>FYI, I was one of the people having problems with this. I went and
>upgraded some other packages, then came back & it worked fine with
>th
On mercredi, avril 24, 2002, at 03:28 , Max Horn wrote:
> There were some issues that made us consider getting out quickly a
> 0.4.0a release. Like for example:
>
> * dangerous problem in passwd
> * broken libmpeg
> * broken r-base
> * source bootstraping seems not possible w/o trick (trick bein
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Max Horn wrote:
> * gdk-pixbuf doesn't build correctl the first time it's built
FYI, I was one of the people having problems with this. I went and
upgraded some other packages, then came back & it worked fine with
the 0.16.0-5 version. Not sure how it ended up resolving itse
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 10:28 PM, Max Horn wrote:
>
> * dangerous problem in passwd
> * broken libmpeg
> * broken r-base
> * source bootstraping seems not possible w/o trick (trick being
> that you download the debianutil source manually, and during
> bootstrap tell Fink in which dire
I think the only real reason there to release >0.4 is the bootstrap fail.
It's the only issue that could potentially render fink unusable for some
new users. Don't get me wrong I think the other problems should be fixed
but how does it make us look if your cmd line installer doesn't even work
an
I agree with your strategy Max: let's fix the problems and then release
0.4.1 relatively soon.
On the libmpeg problem, it looks to me like the version in unstable is OK
but the version in stable is the bad one. Has anybody tested this? We
should move the good version to stable as soon as we can
There were some issues that made us consider getting out quickly a
0.4.0a release. Like for example:
* dangerous problem in passwd
* broken libmpeg
* broken r-base
* source bootstraping seems not possible w/o trick (trick being that
you download the debianutil source manually, and during bootst
11 matches
Mail list logo
