Re: [Fink-devel] Help with shlib

On 7/9/17 1:03 PM, Scott Hannahs wrote: On Jun 26, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Jun 25, 2017, at 17:39, Scott Hannahs wrote: So do I need to modify the install phase to install the /sw/lib/libcryptopp.5.dylib file? Should it be a hard link to the libcryptopp.dylib or s

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with shlib

> On Jun 26, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > >> On Jun 25, 2017, at 17:39, Scott Hannahs wrote: >> >> So do I need to modify the install phase to install the >> /sw/lib/libcryptopp.5.dylib file? Should it be a hard link to the >> libcryptopp.dylib or should that file not exi

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with shlib

> On Jun 25, 2017, at 17:39, Scott Hannahs wrote: > >> >> On Jun 25, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser >> wrote: >> >> On 6/24/17 5:19 PM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-devel wrote: >>> I need a bit of help with a fink package. I don’t fully understand the >>> Shlibs: tag in a fink packa

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with shlib

> On Jun 25, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser > wrote: > > On 6/24/17 5:19 PM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-devel wrote: >> I need a bit of help with a fink package. I don’t fully understand the >> Shlibs: tag in a fink package. I am trying to create a package for a >> dynamic library.

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with shlib

On 6/24/17 5:19 PM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-devel wrote: I need a bit of help with a fink package. I don’t fully understand the Shlibs: tag in a fink package. I am trying to create a package for a dynamic library. The library builds correctly. However it just builds the library as cryptopp.

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with shlib

> On Jun 24, 2017, at 15:19, Scott Hannahs via Fink-devel > wrote: > > I need a bit of help with a fink package. I don’t fully understand the > Shlibs: tag in a fink package. I am trying to create a package for a dynamic > library. The library builds correctly. However it just builds the

[Fink-devel] Help with shlib

I need a bit of help with a fink package. I don’t fully understand the Shlibs: tag in a fink package. I am trying to create a package for a dynamic library. The library builds correctly. However it just builds the library as cryptopp.dylib in the midst of the source files. The discussion of

[Fink-devel] Help with 10.9 g++ errors

Dear learned ones: I'm getting errors in two packages that I maintain on 10.9 with the Oct22 command-line tools and Xcode installed: The one appended below is an example of one of a set from coot; the other set is from rdkit. I have absolutely no idea how to deal with this, and would be gratef

[Fink-devel] Help kill old automake by testing gettext build

The only thing that uses automake1.5 anywhere in stable or unstable is...old gettext. That lib is still used by a bunch of packages (and we have to keep it per Shlibs Policy anyway), so I need help testing the update for it to newer automake. That would be gettext.info in my CVS exp. I went with

Re: [Fink-devel] Help testing Mercurial 1.5

On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > I think so. I can check the current version in, perhaps with an added > DescPort field that says > > << > Automated tests currently fail when run as root. To manually run the > tests after installing mercurial, run the following

Re: [Fink-devel] Help testing Mercurial 1.5

On 3/23/10 10:56 AM, Pepe Barbe wrote: > > > On Mar 23, 2010, at 0:06, Hanspeter Niederstrasser > wrote: > >> It's a permissions issue. >> >> All the following examples are with Fink's mercurial-py26-1.5-1 >> installed and using this command: /sw/bin/python run-tests.py >> --with-hg=/sw/bin/hg -

Re: [Fink-devel] Help testing Mercurial 1.5

On Mar 23, 2010, at 0:06, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > It's a permissions issue. > > All the following examples are with Fink's mercurial-py26-1.5-1 > installed and using this command: /sw/bin/python run-tests.py > --with-hg=/sw/bin/hg -v > > > Running the tests as an admin $USER from a cl

Re: [Fink-devel] Help testing Mercurial 1.5

On 3/22/10 11:54 PM, Pepe Barbe wrote: > I am building the new package for Mercurial 1.5 and I am having some > issues and I would appreciate some help testing. > > It seems when doing a test build under the fink, for some reason > during the Test Phase things get botched and a lot of tests fail. >

[Fink-devel] Help testing Mercurial 1.5

I am building the new package for Mercurial 1.5 and I am having some issues and I would appreciate some help testing. It seems when doing a test build under the fink, for some reason during the Test Phase things get botched and a lot of tests fail. I spoke with upstream and, at least, under Sno

[Fink-devel] Help test new gnome with fontconfig and friends

I've got GNOME2.28 nearly ready to go to unstable. One major set of changes is that it revives fink's own fontconfig2 library (vs falling through to x11's) and makes fink's xft2 shared (had been static-only). This should solve a weird issue where packages tended to link to x11's xft2 and/or fontcon

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with pcb on 10.6

On Sep 10, 2009, at 2:03 AM, Robert Wyatt wrote: > Robert Wyatt wrote: >> Charles Lepple wrote: >>> On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: >>> I got a report from a user that pcb doesn't build on 10.6, and while trying to patch out the problem, it seems like bison isn't

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with pcb on 10.6

Robert Wyatt wrote: > Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: >> >>> I got a report from a user that pcb doesn't build on 10.6, and while >>> trying to patch out the problem, it seems like bison isn't getting >>> called where it should be. >>> >>> Could someone pl

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with pcb on 10.6

Charles Lepple wrote: > On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > >> I got a report from a user that pcb doesn't build on 10.6, and while >> trying to patch out the problem, it seems like bison isn't getting >> called where it should be. >> >> Could someone please build pcb-1.99.20081128

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with pcb on 10.6

On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > I got a report from a user that pcb doesn't build on 10.6, and while > trying to patch out the problem, it seems like bison isn't getting > called where it should be. > > Could someone please build pcb-1.99.20081128-14 (latest in unstable > ATM)

[Fink-devel] Help with pcb on 10.6

Hi all, I got a report from a user that pcb doesn't build on 10.6, and while trying to patch out the problem, it seems like bison isn't getting called where it should be. Could someone please build pcb-1.99.20081128-14 (latest in unstable ATM) on Snow Leopard and send me the build log? Dependenci

Re: [Fink-devel] Help test GNOME2.26 packages

Hi Dan The thing just finished building (june 3, 1.40 GMT _ roughly 5 1/2 hours after your message), basically without a hitch on a Core2Duo running 10.5.6 (Just put a link to your exp dir in my local tree, and ran fink update-all _ did a quick check after that indeed the update-all was installin

[Fink-devel] Help test GNOME2.26 packages

My CVS exp/ has most of the core packages of gnome2.26, "build and work for me on 10.4/ppc" but would appreciate some build-testing on intel machines before this is unleashed into unstable. The language-bindings (c++, perl, python) and anything depending on them are not done yet, but may as well ge

Re: [Fink-devel] help with debugging -> dbus + pidgin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benjamin Reed wrote: > Pidgin is exploding with DBus in a weird way, and I'm starting to think > it's actually got a memory corruption issue or something. The dbus > stuff it's doing is very simple, and working in other apps. I have very > poor gdb-f

[Fink-devel] help with debugging -> dbus + pidgin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pidgin is exploding with DBus in a weird way, and I'm starting to think it's actually got a memory corruption issue or something. The dbus stuff it's doing is very simple, and working in other apps. I have very poor gdb-fu, does anyone have any ideas

Re: [Fink-devel] help

On Sep 26, 2008, at 11:50 PM, nicolas wrote: > I didn't notice anything from you other than that entire digest (bad form, that). What exactly do you want help on? - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move

[Fink-devel] help

On 27 Sep 2008, at 04:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send Fink-devel mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > or, via email, send a message

[Fink-devel] Help us improve our Wikipedia exposure.

Dear Friends of Fink. Like most of the well known "brands" and "tools" in the world Fink has a page within the vast space that is Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fink Fink currently does receive traffic from that page attracting people to the wonderful world of Fink. For February 2008 aro

Re: [Fink-devel] Help for Wine update in tracker

On 9/18/07, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1790885&group_id=17203&atid=414256 > > > > I don't have an Intel Mac, so I can't built it. If somebody has a > > clean-build option to check out BuildDep

Re: [Fink-devel] Help for Wine update in tracker

Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1790885&group_id=17203&atid=414256 > > I don't have an Intel Mac, so I can't built it. If somebody has a > clean-build option to check out BuildDepends / Depends, that would be > really good. I've got some cr

[Fink-devel] Help for Wine update in tracker

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1790885&group_id=17203&atid=414256 I don't have an Intel Mac, so I can't built it. If somebody has a clean-build option to check out BuildDepends / Depends, that would be really good. I've got some crude scripts to capture a list of inst

[Fink-devel] help needed: firefox1.5 being EOL'd and can't build latest

Firefox 1.5 is being EOL'd upstream in about 1 month. Currently I can't get the latest (and apparently 2nd to last ever) firefox1.5 point release to build on 10.3 (10.4 is ok) and would like to get that done so that when the 10.3 tree is EOL'd here, 10.3 users at least have the last version of

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

stephen joseph butler wrote: > I don't know if anyone's noticed this yet, but... > > in today's OS X update (10.4.9) Apple upgraded their tar package to 1.16.1. > > charon:~ admin$ tar --version > tar (GNU tar) 1.16.1 > You might want to check which tar you're looking at via "which tar". I get:

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

I don't know if anyone's noticed this yet, but... in today's OS X update (10.4.9) Apple upgraded their tar package to 1.16.1. charon:~ admin$ tar --version tar (GNU tar) 1.16.1 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software. You may redistribute copies of it under the te

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed: Improving the Package Database (pdb)

On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 07:55:37PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > > > Christian Schaffner wrote: > > [] > >> 1) > >> Help testing! Go to > >> > >> http://finch.finkproject.org/~chris01/fink_web/pdb/ > >> > >> and test anything you can thi

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed: Improving the Package Database (pdb)

On Mar 12, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > Christian Schaffner wrote: > [] >> 1) >> Help testing! Go to >> >> http://finch.finkproject.org/~chris01/fink_web/pdb/ >> >> and test anything you can think of. > > The bug that the pdb doesn't know about the "current" bindist is still > prese

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed: Improving the Package Database (pdb)

Christian Schaffner wrote: [] > 1) > Help testing! Go to > > http://finch.finkproject.org/~chris01/fink_web/pdb/ > > and test anything you can think of. The bug that the pdb doesn't know about the "current" bindist is still present, it seems. Could this *please* be fixed? See bug tracker #1606

[Fink-devel] Help needed: Improving the Package Database (pdb)

Dear Fink Developers and Supporters A couple of people have been working on replacing the current Fink Package Database (pdb) with a newer and more powerful version. A working prototype can be found at: http://finch.finkproject.org/~chris01/fink_web/pdb But we need help finishing this projec

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Koen van der Drift wrote: > Yes: > > ... > Writing control file... > Writing package script postinst... > Writing package script prerm... > dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070221 /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/ > binary-darwin-powerpc/languages > dpkg-deb: building package `gcc42' in `/sw/fink/10.

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Yes: ... Writing control file... Writing package script postinst... Writing package script prerm... dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070221 /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/ binary-darwin-powerpc/languages dpkg-deb: building package `gcc42' in `/sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/ binary-darwin-powerpc/lang

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Koen van der Drift wrote: > No problems with gcc42. Did you still see "file changed as we read it"? With the patched version, it should still show up, only as a warning, not an error. -- Martin - Take Surveys. Earn Cash

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

No problems with gcc42. - Koen. On Mar 10, 2007, at 5:00 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > Thanks to a patch written by vasi, there is now an experimental > version of dpkg which should be compatible with the new tar, that > is, it should not die even if tar encounters "file changed as we >

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Thanks to a patch written by vasi, there is now an experimental version of dpkg which should be compatible with the new tar, that is, it should not die even if tar encounters "file changed as we read it". I would appreciate some testing on this, particularly from those of you who managed t

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > Could those of you who have or had the dpkg-deb failure caused by > tar-1.16.1 claiming > > "file changed as we read it" > > please help with debugging this? Based on the outcome of these > tests, we should be able to decide whether we ne

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Let me know if you still need more data points. Using your diagnostic 'tar', gcc42 died during packaging [1] (Core Duo, 10.4.8): Writing control file... Writing package script postinst... Writing package script prerm... dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070221 /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, David Fang wrote: > > Because mysql takes not so much time to build compared to gcc4, I > > tried that one first with the new tar. On my system it build and > > installed without an error. Right now I am building gcc4. Once that > > is done in a couple of hours, I will let you

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

> Because mysql takes not so much time to build compared to gcc4, I > tried that one first with the new tar. On my system it build and > installed without an error. Right now I am building gcc4. Once that > is done in a couple of hours, I will let you know how it went. Hi all, Even though I repro

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

So gcc finally finished, and I got the same error. Here's the output as requested: dpkg-deb -b root-gcc4-4.1.-20060617 /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/ binary-darwin-powerpc/languages dpkg-deb: building package `gcc4' in `/sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/ binary-darwin-powerpc/languages/gcc4_4.1.99

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Charles Lepple wrote: > On 3/3/07, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Charles Lepple wrote: >> > Martin, >> > >> > I'd be curious to see how far those ctimes are from the current >> > time(). Can you post your patch? >> >> They are just printed out with format %i. To get the real time, y

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

On 3/3/07, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles Lepple wrote: > > Martin, > > > > I'd be curious to see how far those ctimes are from the current > > time(). Can you post your patch? > > They are just printed out with format %i. To get the real time, you can > run these numbers thro

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Charles Lepple wrote: > Martin, > > I'd be curious to see how far those ctimes are from the current > time(). Can you post your patch? They are just printed out with format %i. To get the real time, you can run these numbers through "/bin/date -r": % /bin/date -r 1172946146 Sat Mar 3 19:22:26

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Martin, I'd be curious to see how far those ctimes are from the current time(). Can you post your patch? On 3/3/07, Daniel Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > > > Could those of you who hav

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > Could those of you who have or had the dpkg-deb failure caused by > tar-1.16.1 claiming > >"file changed as we read it" > > please help with debugging this? Based on the outcome of these > te

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

On 3/3/07, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could those of you who have or had the dpkg-deb failure caused by > tar-1.16.1 claiming > >"file changed as we read it" > > please help with debugging this? Sure. I have been rebuilding stuff all morning with this version of tar, and I ha

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Because mysql takes not so much time to build compared to gcc4, I tried that one first with the new tar. On my system it build and installed without an error. Right now I am building gcc4. Once that is done in a couple of hours, I will let you know how it went. - Koen. On Mar 3, 2007, at 3

[Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Could those of you who have or had the dpkg-deb failure caused by tar-1.16.1 claiming "file changed as we read it" please help with debugging this? Based on the outcome of these tests, we should be able to decide whether we need to patch tar or dpkg, or whether we need to dig further down.

Re: [Fink-devel] help postgresql dependencies

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:23:42AM -0600, Neil Tiffin wrote: > > If I understand you correctly, I should make psycopg2 depend on > postgresql82 and therefore it will not install with 81, 80, and 74. > Or I have to make a separate package for each one of the other > postgresql variations(alo

Re: [Fink-devel] help postgresql dependencies

On 2/14/07, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Neil Tiffin wrote: > > > often. Attached is the debian control file which seems to work fine and > > does not have all of this complexity. > > It would work, if "shlibs" worked on OSX, but un

Re: [Fink-devel] help postgresql dependencies

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Tiffin wrote: > often. Attached is the debian control file which seems to work fine and > does not have all of this complexity. It would work, if "shlibs" worked on OSX, but unfortunately, it depends on knowing how ELF libraries work. We've ha

Re: [Fink-devel] help postgresql dependencies

On Feb 13, 2007, at 10:29 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Neil Tiffin wrote: > >> Now my question. psycopg2 does not care about which postgresql >> package is installed (to the best of my knowledge). But it needs a - >> dev to build and any one of t

Re: [Fink-devel] help postgresql dependencies

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Tiffin wrote: > Now my question. psycopg2 does not care about which postgresql > package is installed (to the best of my knowledge). But it needs a - > dev to build and any one of these to run. What should I have in the > "Depends" and "Bu

[Fink-devel] help postgresql dependencies

I am trying to update psycopg2. There are now no limit to the number of postgresql packages that psycopg2 will work with. Including postgresql74 7.4.16-1021 upgrade package for postgresql74 postgresql74-dev 7.4.16-1021

[Fink-devel] Help needed in packaging Gnucash

I am working on a package for Gnucash 1.9.x (beta versions for Gnucash 2.0 that should be released soon). The package is my in exp branch. It compiles fine, but there is a problem with shared libs: % gnucash ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link: ERROR: file: "libgw-core-utils", message: "dlopen(libgw

[Fink-devel] Help needed: New openldap version and libtool

Dear Fink Developers I am trying to update the current openldap-ssl package (that has no maintainer) to the latest stable version (2.3.11) and at the same time linking it to system-openssl. I have a preliminary version in my experimental tree at: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink

Re: [Fink-devel] Help in Gnome apps

On Aug 22, 2005, at 2:30 PM, Sébastien Maret wrote: I can't read the help files of Gnome app. I don't really have much to contribute here. Just confirming that this happens, and that I don't know why. Maybe a bug in yelp? Dave PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Fink-devel] Help in Gnome apps

I can't read the help files of Gnome app. When I click on Help > Content in e.g Nautilus, I get the following error message. There was an error displaying help: Help document user-guide/user-guide.xml not found I have same error in all my Gnome apps (some do not display any message though).

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed with g++ handling

Le 29 juin 2005 à 19:31, Dave Vasilevsky a écrit : Hi Michèle, I'm glad my email was helpful to you. The SetCXX: c++ and SetCC: cc that you used in cssed accomplish nothing, but they're also harmless. So you can leave them in or remove them, it's up to you. So, it was here till the beg

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed with g++ handling

Hi Michèle, I'm glad my email was helpful to you. The SetCXX: c++ and SetCC: cc that you used in cssed accomplish nothing, but they're also harmless. So you can leave them in or remove them, it's up to you. So, it was here till the beginning, could I remove it in all trees? I mean this is

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed with g++ handling

Hi Dave, Le 28 juin 2005 à 13:08, Dave Vasilevsky a écrit : Hi Michèle, It seems you're a bit confused, understandable given the GCC situation. Hopefully this mail can make things clearer, it's a bit long so I've written it in sections. Also, you may want to read the new section in the p

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed with g++ handling

Hi Michèle, It seems you're a bit confused, understandable given the GCC situation. Hopefully this mail can make things clearer, it's a bit long so I've written it in sections. Also, you may want to read the new section in the packaging manual: http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/ packaging/co

[Fink-devel] Help needed with g++ handling

First, for those who were on the channel, I apologize for having ranted, but well not fun to waste my time with this and not being able to come to a solution. Here's the culprit: cssed in section editors. A - Current situation 1 - It is written mainly in C, but builds a private C++ library

[Fink-devel] help testing new Installers

I hope a few people will be willing to help test some new binary Installers for fink (under 10.2 and 10.3) before they are released to the user community. The files are at: http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.6.4-Installer.dmg (for 10.2) http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.7.2-Installer.dmg

Re: [Fink-devel] help test new fink configure

if you add it to head I'll help test. ---TShttp://southofheaven.org/Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 16-Apr-05, at 11:28 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:I've got a modified version of "fink configure" in branch_0_24, and could useanother pair or two of eyes to help test.  T

[Fink-devel] help test new fink configure

I've got a modified version of "fink configure" in branch_0_24, and could use another pair or two of eyes to help test. The main change happens if you have an entry among your mirror choices which is not (any longer) on the list of mirror sites. Let me know if you have any feedback on this. I pl

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed for packaging

On Sep 29, 2004, at 3:52 AM, Adrien Di Mascio wrote: Hi all, The first thing is : sorry if I write to the wrong mailing-list. My problem is : I'm a new user of Mac os X / Fink, but I come from the linux world (actually I'm still in it), and we use Debian at work. We have a few open-source (mostly p

[Fink-devel] Help needed for packaging

Hi all, The first thing is : sorry if I write to the wrong mailing-list. My problem is : I'm a new user of Mac os X / Fink, but I come from the linux world (actually I'm still in it), and we use Debian at work. We have a few open-source (mostly python) packages available on our website (http://ww

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed : making packages

gilles pujol wrote: I'm new to fink and I want to port some software in it (first one : bamg, a meshtool generator). I'm still reading the documentation, but if someone could give me some information that would make my work faster... Some questions : What is the procedure to make .deb files w

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed : making packages

On Apr 2, 2004, at 1:46 PM, gilles pujol wrote: I'm new to fink and I want to port some software in it (first one : bamg, a meshtool generator). I'm still reading the documentation, but if someone could give me some information that would make my work faster... Some questions : What is the pr

[Fink-devel] help needed : making packages

I'm new to fink and I want to port some software in it (first one : bamg, a meshtool generator). I'm still reading the documentation, but if someone could give me some information that would make my work faster... Some questions : What is the procedure to make .deb files with dpkg? Do I need t

Re: [Fink-devel] HELP!

The locale warnings are harmless: The other warning may be benign, too. How are you starting GNOME: are you calling it in .xinitrc, or are you invoking it from a terminal? On 6/12/03 6:35 AM, "Frank Soranno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After just opening Gnome desktop for the first time, that

[Fink-devel] HELP!

After just opening Gnome desktop for the first time, that it was installed I got this message " You are not running Gnome compliant "Window Manager", Also my xterm gives me this, with sample rate 44100.00, 2 channels and 32-bit sample using device Built-in audio controller for input: with sam

[Fink-devel] help porting SplitsTree

Hello Fink developers. I hope this isn't too irrelevant to this list, but I'm trying to get a program to compile for Darwin/X11 and I don't really know what I'm doing, but I having fun so I thought I'd stick at it. There is a Linux Makefile but it doesn't work (I can provide more details). A

[Fink-devel] help testing postgresql 7.3 packages

I've got PostgreSQL 7.3.1 packages in my experimental tree, but before I'm willing to release them to unstable I'd like some 3rd-party confirmation that my upgrade path works OK. =) PostgreSQL has some tricky work in upgrading since they don't provide upgrade tools, and change their on-disk forma

[Fink-devel] Help me sort out which command line commands to document..

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 In Engine.pm we have 'index' (documented) 'rescan' 'configure' (documented) 'bootstrap' 'fetch' 'fetch-all' 'fetch-missing' 'build' 'rebuild' 'install' (documented) 'reinstall' 'remove' (documented) 'updat

[Fink-devel] help needed with 0.5.0 source distro

I have put a preliminary version of the 0.5.0 source distribution up on sourceforge, but I need some help with it. We've had a number of changes recently, including the change from 10.1 to 10.2, and I'm not sure if the source distribution actually does what it's supposed to do at this point, or if

[Fink-devel] help needed with testing

Peter and I realized today that his "dlcompat" package needs a splitoff version. This has now been put into the 10.2/unstable tree, and at the same time, dlcompat-dev was added as a "BuildDepends" in many packages, but only in the unstable tree. Please help us test this, so that we can move it to

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed testing replacement fink 0.4.1 binaryinstaller

David R. Morrison wrote: [] Martin, were you "root" when you created this? Or else how did you get everything to be owned by root in the .pax.gz file? That is perhaps an important step when creating future binary installers... Yes. I had tried a "sudo chown -R root.admin", but then PackageMa

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed testing replacement fink 0.4.1 binary installer

Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David R. Morrison wrote: > > > Maybe somebody > > else can make a new 0.4.1 installer? I'll be happy to talk you through > > the process... > > In case this is still needed, I made one. It looks OK to me, but since I > had never touched PackageMake

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed testing replacement fink 0.4.1binary installer

At 17:05 Uhr -0500 31.10.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: Can someone please test Martin's installer package? You'll need at 10.1.x system to test it. (I won't have access to a 10.1.x system until next Monday at the earliest, myself.) Not only should you test that it installs OK, but you should c

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed testing replacement fink 0.4.1 binary installer

Can someone please test Martin's installer package? You'll need at 10.1.x system to test it. (I won't have access to a 10.1.x system until next Monday at the earliest, myself.) Not only should you test that it installs OK, but you should check what happens if you use the installer severl times i

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed testing replacement fink 0.4.1 binaryinstaller

David R. Morrison wrote: Maybe somebody else can make a new 0.4.1 installer? I'll be happy to talk you through the process... In case this is still needed, I made one. It looks OK to me, but since I had never touched PackageMaker before, it would be necessary that someone else tested it. It

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed testing replacement fink 0.4.1 binary installer

Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David R. Morrison wrote: > > > [] > > What my "fix" does is to alter the .pax.gz file with the contents of the > > installation so that the permission on "." is 1755 in the directory > > instead of 0700. > > What did you do with the bom file? Not on

Re: [Fink-devel] help needed testing replacement fink 0.4.1 binaryinstaller

David R. Morrison wrote: [] What my "fix" does is to alter the .pax.gz file with the contents of the installation so that the permission on "." is 1755 in the directory instead of 0700. What did you do with the bom file? Not only does it still contain the permissions 700 for ".", but lsbom cr

[Fink-devel] help needed testing replacement fink 0.4.1 binary installer

Dear Fink Developers, As you may have seen in a few recent messages, there is a serious problem with the fink 0.4.1 binary installer which occurs if a user installs using the installer twice. The permissions on the root directory of the machine are altered, and the machine no longer boots! I've

[Fink-devel] help packaging smssend using Fink

Dear Fink-devel, Smssend is a command line utility for sending short text messages to mobile phones. I have compiled smssend for OSX and have a Fink .info file working. It works (on my system) but I want to make sure that I have got it right. I was wondering if there is any kind person who

Re: [Fink-devel] Help porting

At 22:03 Uhr -0500 01.02.2002, Bill Bumgarner wrote: >Did you build the client or the server? Hm, I think only the client >The client is trivial; pretty much builds out of the box. Yup, mostly. It had some nasty problems when I tried, but I believe they have fixed all of them now. >The serv

Re: [Fink-devel] Help porting

At 22:03 Uhr -0500 01.02.2002, Bill Bumgarner wrote: [...] > >Version of libtool? > >I'm not at all sure; how do I tell? By looking at ltmain.sh > In any case, swapping in the ltmain. >sh and ltconfig from Fink didn't help; I still saw the version >mismatch problem. What do you mean, "sti

Re: [Fink-devel] Help porting

Did you build the client or the server? The client is trivial; pretty much builds out of the box. The server is more problematic in that it requires the mod_dav.h header, db4, and apr-- apache portable runtime. mod_dav.h is interesting in that it can only be had by installing mod_dav. Ap

Re: [Fink-devel] Help porting

The question is, what libtool version are they using? I have setup subversion in the past succesfully, but that was one or two milestones ago I believe. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-4948

[Fink-devel] Help porting

I'm in the midst of porting subversion to OS X, creating a Fink package in the process. Subversion's source tree is a rather complex beast that includes a number of other packages directly within and, hence, has a number of different beasts that use various forms of autoconf. It appears that