Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging Problem

2016-03-07 Thread David Lowe
Scratching my head here. I'm only doing "fink -m build regina", not a full install yet. Install phase does this: > /usr/bin/install -m 755 -c ./rxstack.init.d > /sw/src/fink.build/root-regina-3.8.2-3/sw/sbin/rxstack-control but the validator doesn't like it: > Validating .deb

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging Problem

2016-03-02 Thread David Lowe
On 2016 Mar 2, at 08:35, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > Files: lib/libregina.0.dylib lib/libtest1.0.dylib lib/libtest2.0.dylib Durn, dunno how that got by the search & replace. Thanks! David Lowe [email protected] The Doctor: A little gratitude wouldn't irretrievably damage my eg

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging Problem

2016-03-02 Thread Alexander Hansen
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 02:36, David Lowe wrote: > > I'm trying to revive the dormant "Regina" package. This new info file > is based on the old one, but i had to make changes because the new upstream > version renamed some components ('libtest1.0.dylib -> librxtest1.0.dylib, > etc.) Fin

[Fink-devel] Packaging Problem

2016-03-02 Thread David Lowe
I'm trying to revive the dormant "Regina" package. This new info file is based on the old one, but i had to make changes because the new upstream version renamed some components ('libtest1.0.dylib -> librxtest1.0.dylib, etc.) Fine, so i did a search&replace. Now compile phase finishes

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging problem

2010-03-11 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/11/10 11:30 AM, Pranay Airan wrote: > hello, > > As you have suggested us to have a local copy of _structs.h, we have > copied it in to /sw/cilkheader (which we have created) You've now got something that won't work on anybody else's machine b

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging problem

2010-03-11 Thread Pranay Airan
hello, As you have suggested us to have a local copy of _structs.h, we have copied it in to /sw/cilkheader (which we have created) and we have included the following lines in cilk.info file SetCPPFLAGS: -I%p/cilkheader Now we could successfully run fink -m rebuild cilk and could install cilk in

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging problem

2010-03-10 Thread Max Horn
Am 09.03.2010 um 16:55 schrieb Pranay Airan: > Hello, > > I am facing problem while creating info file, i discuss this problem > earlier and got some suggestions but still i am unclear how to proceed > > in my port when porting for MAC while i am compiling any program > which includes stdlib.

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging problem

2010-03-09 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/9/10 11:21 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 3/9/10 10:55 AM, Pranay Airan wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am facing problem while creating info file, i discuss this problem earlier >> and got some suggestions but still i am unclear how to proceed

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging problem

2010-03-09 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 3/9/10 10:55 AM, Pranay Airan wrote: > Hello, > > I am facing problem while creating info file, i discuss this problem earlier > and got some suggestions but still i am unclear how to proceed > > in my port when porting for MAC while i am compiling any program which > includes *stdlib.h* it give

[Fink-devel] packaging problem

2010-03-09 Thread Pranay Airan
Hello, I am facing problem while creating info file, i discuss this problem earlier and got some suggestions but still i am unclear how to proceed in my port when porting for MAC while i am compiling any program which includes *stdlib.h* it gives syntax error, which in turn found to be in *usr/in

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging problem

2003-03-05 Thread Ben Hines
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 01:39 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Any thoughts on how to make this conform to Fink policy, or else how to rephrase the policy to allow for this exception but not let in other things which we find objectionable? The policy does already allow for this exception, IM

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging problem

2003-03-05 Thread Justin Hallett
this is why we have the flag IMHO, else we'd make the buildonlydepends flag in fink, all -dev pkgs = buildonly depend :) we figured there would be rare cases where this wouldn't be so and left the feild to the maintainer's disgrestion :) That is my stand on it. "David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECT

[Fink-devel] packaging problem

2003-03-05 Thread David R. Morrison
Dear Fink developers, I've run into a packaging problem on one of the submitted packages in the tracker. The package is a kind of development environment used by high-energy physicists. It consists of a bunch of libraries together with some executables which help you use those libraries in worki