There is a --force-not-root option to dpkg; I'm not sure about
dpkg-deb.
All I know is that I've used the user patch that's already on our
patch tracker successfully on lamancha.opendarwin.org until a
selfupdate wiped it out.
I've just added this to my dpkg lines in PkgVersion.pm and its working
Ok, so I've added the non-root force option to the dpkg line, but now
dpkg fails when changing the user from 'fink' to 'fink'? iThink that
part of it might be the group, its trying to assign 'wheel'... Well,
I'll keep y'all posted. If you wanna help, here's my patch so far:
finkUser.patch
De
Dave, I definitely did not have unstable/crypto in the trees: line of the
fink.conf file. That must be the problem, so many thanks.
Lenny
On 10/10/03 6:38 PM, "David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have unstable/crypto and unstable/main in the Trees line in
> /sw/etc/fink.conf ?
> IMHO there should be *no* package that makes *anything* SUID root that
> I (the user) don't know about, thus those packages that require
> something like that should be modified on a per-package basis (for
> these packages something like 'sudo make...' would work fine).
True in principle, an
I installed fink fresh from the 0.14.0 tarball.
When I add the unstable trees and use the rsync method for update it
fails.
The reason is that fink says:
mkdir 10.2/unstable/main
however, 10.2/unstable does not exist and therefore the "main"
directory can not be made inside of it.
The quickf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed fink fresh from the 0.14.0 tarball.
When I add the unstable trees and use the rsync method for update it
fails.
The reason is that fink says:
mkdir 10.2/unstable/main
however, 10.2/unstable does not exist and therefore the "main"
directory can not be made
Greg Novak wrote:
At this point I think it would be useful to consider _why_ user-mode fink
is important and _what_ it's supposed to accomplish.
Actually *at this point*, the most important consideration in getting
user-mode fink adopted is to do it later. =)
Max has been too busy to do much w
I started a fresh installation of fink for 10.2-gcc3.3 by installing the
fink-5.3 installer, making the symlink dists->10.2-gcc3.3,
selfupdate-cvs to the latest descriptions, installing fink-0.14.0, and
fink update-all.
The updating of dpkg failed, because the header file libintl.h was not
fou
Martin,
If I uncomment that line, fink gives a circular dependency error. As is
often the case with those errors, I've been unable to track down why.
Bootstrapping from 0.14.0 should work OK.
-- Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
David R. Morrison wrote:
Martin,
If I uncomment that line, fink gives a circular dependency error. As is
often the case with those errors, I've been unable to track down why.
Bootstrapping from 0.14.0 should work OK.
The whole line is not needed, just gettext-dev. After installing
gettext-dev (
Dear developers,
I'm updating some of my fink packages (first of all sci/root3). It is
not clear to me how I should handle the package updates and submissions
for the different trees.
Is it mandatory to have the same package versions in both 10.2 and
10.2-gcc3.3 tree? If I would like to move a
Remi Mommsen wrote:
Dear developers,
I'm updating some of my fink packages (first of all sci/root3). It is
not clear to me how I should handle the package updates and submissions
for the different trees.
Is it mandatory to have the same package versions in both 10.2 and
10.2-gcc3.3 tree? If I
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> User-mode fink is useful to a very small part of the fink population,
Not so. At work I lack root on many of the *nix boxes I use, so I
regularly build and install the stuff I need in ~/local. A package
manager like fink would be a godsend for this pu
13 matches
Mail list logo
