[Fink-devel] Orphaning swi-prolog

2002-05-06 Thread Michèl Alexandre Salim
Hello, I no longer have my iBook so I would be unable to maintain SWI Prolog's Fink package any longer. I have already received a query about the package being out of date - if anyone would like to step in and take it over, I'd be really grateful. Regards, Michel Salim ___

[Fink-devel] policy for orphaned packages?

2002-05-06 Thread David R. Morrison
I think we need a policy for how to handle packages which are abandoned by their maintainers. I propose this: 1) Change the maintainer field to Maintainer: The Fink Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We can add "formerly maintained by..." to DescPackaging if it seems appropriate. 2

Re: [Fink-devel] policy for orphaned packages?

2002-05-06 Thread Justin Hallett
In regards to former Maintainers I'm in the process of adding a new field and new command to fink for a changelog, witha specific format. Once it's done we can add when a pkg has changed maintainers in that field. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 1) Change the maintainer field to > Maintainer:

[Fink-devel] Cdrtools install fail

2002-05-06 Thread Joshua Hancik
Title: Cdrtools install fail Listees, I am such a newbie that it is not even funny, but I did try and test the cdrtools package installer.  It failed, I’m sorry to say, and I’m not quite sure what to do next. I have the latest version of Fink (self-update to CVS), the latest cdrtools package (

[Fink-devel] PHP and PostgreSQL

2002-05-06 Thread Gary Kerbaugh
Hi Guys, I was trying to compile PHP with PostgreSQL support. I tried adding --with-pgsql=%p and --with-pgsql=shared,%p to the ConfigureParams. The later allowed it to compile but both resulted in the following compiler warning: *** Warning: This library needs some functionality provided by

Re: [Fink-devel] PHP and PostgreSQL

2002-05-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
libpq.so.2.1 seems to be a bundle, not a shared library peter% file libpq.so.2.1 libpq.so.2.1: Mach-O bundle ppc I guess it is this way for a reason, i.e. in order to be dlopenable. libtool gives these errors because it cannot find a dylib version of the library to link against, you can tell

[Fink-devel] Re: The fink.sourceforge.net/ listing on IndX.ca

2002-05-06 Thread Claire Appleby
Dear devel, Index Express is mapping the Internet, and You are now on it! Someone has listed your website/company on the Index, our geographic seach engine, http://www.indx.ca, and we need you to validate the data. Following is a link to the information we have lis

[Fink-devel] FYI: qt 3.0.4 upgrade will break old libraries

2002-05-06 Thread Benjamin Reed
Just a note, I've just committed a new version of the QT info file that updates it to 3.0.4, and also fixes some bugs. The most important one it fixes is the compatibility_version, which was being set to 0.0.0, even though the filenames were named correctly. Unfortunately, anything built agai

[Fink-devel] upgrade strategy for pairs of packages?

2002-05-06 Thread David R. Morrison
I've run into trouble figuring out an upgrade strategy for pairs of packages when converting them to splitoff form. There are two pairs already in unstable: freetype/freetype-hinting and giflib/libungif. There is a third one in the shared-libraries/splitoff module: gnome-vfs/gnome-vfs-ssl. I b

Re: [Fink-devel] FYI: qt 3.0.4 upgrade will break old libraries

2002-05-06 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Monday, May 6, 2002, at 09:48 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: > Just a note, I've just committed a new version of the QT info file that > updates it to 3.0.4, and also fixes some bugs. The most important one > it fixes is the compatibility_version, which was being set to 0.0.0, > even though the

Re: [Fink-devel] FYI: qt 3.0.4 upgrade will break old libraries

2002-05-06 Thread Justin Hallett
updating all the pkgs will also force a rebuild on all of them to avoid any issues as RangerRick (Ben) had previously mentioned. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Just a note, I've just committed a new version of the QT info file that >> updates it to 3.0.4, and also fixes some bugs. The most import