Same here. Fink is on another partition than OS X and /sw symlinks to
it. Never had any problem with that. Additionally, /sw is also used
by other software (not Fink related) who looks for /sw into AFS
system and also the sharing did not produce any ill-fated side effect.
Massimo
At 1:44 PM -
On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 11:06 PM, John Melby wrote:
> Thanks for the advice--but I'm afraid it doesn't apply in this case,
> since I've been using the Mac OS X Developer Tools from day one of their
> availability with the Public Beta, and I've been using XFree86 with Fink
> for quite so
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, John Melby wrote:
> Thanks for the advice--but I'm afraid it doesn't apply in this case,
Ok ok sorry, I'm juget getting a little *too* used to people asking why
they need a compiler to, well, compile things, and I'm about ready to wrap
up a stock answer into a boilerplate t
Thanks for the advice--but I'm afraid it doesn't apply in this case,
since I've been using the Mac OS X Developer Tools from day one of their
availability with the Public Beta, and I've been using XFree86 with Fink
for quite some time, having installed, among other things, Gimp,
abiword, g77,
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, John Melby wrote:
> checking for gcc... gcc
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc -L/sw/lib) works... no
> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler
> cannot create executables.
> ### ./configure failed, exit code 1
> Failed: compiling aalib-1.4rc
When I type "fink update-all" after running the "fink selfupdate"
command, I get output that ends with this:
=
./configure --prefix=/sw --infodir=/sw/src/root-
aalib-1.4rc4-5/sw/share/info --mandir=/sw/src/root-
aalib-1.4rc4-5/sw/share/man
creating cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD co
One of the main reasons I installed Fink in the first place was to gain
access to some of the excellent *NIX utilities available on the net. I
particularly wanted a current version of SPICE so I could work on some
amplifier designs that have been waiting on me for years.:-)
Anyway, I download
>Are you sure the build went OK? A missing file typically indicates that
>something failed in the compilation process. Check further back in the
>output of your build to be sure.
You are right, it was a little further up, about four lines:
ld: -undefined error must be used when -twolevel_names
On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 06:50 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
>> Anyone knows what it means (or even better, how to fix it)?
>
> Nope, sorry. Off the top of my head I think that I was getting this error
> both with Fink's vim and the one that I built myself, though it's been a
> few months and I wo
Hi All,
I just upgraded up to package manager 0.9.9, and am using distribution version 0.3.2a.cvs, in an effort to get pymol running. Anyway, when I try to use fink to get things, all curl commands go down fine, then when I get to Python, I get this.
curl -f -L -O ftp://ftp.python.org/pub/python
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Derek Homeier wrote:
> I see a probably completely harmless, but annoying bug in vim:
I've been getting the same error for quite a while now. To be honest I
just assumed I had something wrong in my ~/.vimrc file. I get this bug
when invoking Vim from the console and graphica
On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 04:58 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
>
>> With other Unix systems you'd simply have an empty directory called /sw
>> which would be a mount point for your partitions. The all the paths are
>> still the default /sw... MacOS X insists on mounting everything under
>> /Volumes
Hi all,
I see a probably completely harmless, but annoying bug in vim:
when editing shell scripts (sh/zsh/ksh at least), I frequently get the
following error on startup:
Error detected while processing /sw/share/vim/vim60/syntax/sh.vim:
line 321:
E394: Didn't find region item for shRepeat
Inva
On 23/3/02 3:00 AM, "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When a new major version number of a package is released, is it appropriate
> to let the maintainer know directly, or should it be treated as a new
> package request and submitted to the package request tracker? This has come
Hi all,
for some time now control-center is failing to build in my cvs installation,
apparently because the gnomecc compile is missing a -L/usr/X11R6/lib:
cc -I/sw/include/gdk-pixbuf-1.0 -I/sw/include/gtk-1.2 -I/sw/include/glib-1.2
-I/sw/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include-O3 -Wall -Wunused
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Jens Nöckel wrote:
> the garbled-module complaint is gone now, after I downloaded
> apache again and rebuilt it. Only point #2 is still there: lynx
> seems to be needed when invoking ./apachectl status
Yep, looks like the stock apachectl asks for it too:
%
Hi again,
the garbled-module complaint is gone now, after I downloaded
apache again and rebuilt it. Only point #2 is still there: lynx
seems to be needed when invoking ./apachectl status
Jens
On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 11:37 AM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
> Hi -
> Yesterday, I installed apache from
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Paul Lieberman wrote:
> With other Unix systems you'd simply have an empty directory called /sw
> which would be a mount point for your partitions. The all the paths are
> still the default /sw... MacOS X insists on mounting everything under
> /Volumes but you can still have
At 14:46 Uhr -0500 22.03.2002, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
>I have a question about the resume feature.
>
>If I do 'fink install' (or 'reinstall', 'rebuild', or 'build') on a package
>with a partial tarball, the tarball expands until the unexpected EOF and
>then I am still prompted to delete the ta
With other Unix systems you'd simply have an empty directory called /sw
which would be a mount point for your partitions. The all the paths are
still the default /sw... MacOS X insists on mounting everything under
/Volumes but you can still have /sw be a symlink to /Volumes/SomeDisk
and all should
I've been using the symbolic link technique for some time. No problems with
it as far as i can tell. This way I can keep all my fink stuff on a UFS
partition.
--On Friday, March 22, 2002 4:02 PM -0500 "Alexander K. Hansen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never tried it. Here are some extra
I've never tried it. Here are some extra things to check:
1) Make sure the Basepath: line in fink.conf (formerly /sw/etc/fink.conf)
points at the correct directory
2) You'll have to edit init.csh (formerly /sw/bin/init.csh) because it looks
like it explicitly picks /sw as the fink directory.
3)
Hi,
For diskspace reasons and to prevent reinstalling everything if I have to
reinstall OSX, I would like to install fink on a different partiton. Is
choosing a different partition for the installation and changing the line
in .cshrc enough, or should I do something else too?
thanks,
- Koen
On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 06:19 PM, Tobias Weber wrote:
> This says, in conflict with the package db on the web,
>
> xfree86-base4.1.0-9 XFree86 libraries, utilities and data
> xfree86-rootles 4.1.99.2001 XFree86 rootless display server
> xfree86-server 4.1.0-5 XFree86 display s
I have a question about the resume feature.
If I do 'fink install' (or 'reinstall', 'rebuild', or 'build') on a package
with a partial tarball, the tarball expands until the unexpected EOF and
then I am still prompted to delete the tarball and start again, rather than
having the opportunity to re
Hi -
Yesterday, I installed apache from CVS. Today, I tried to start it for
the first time by doing /sw/sbin/apachectl start, but the result was:
Syntax error on line 236 of /sw/etc/httpd/httpd.conf:
API module structure `hfs_apple_module' in file
/sw/lib/apache/1.3/mod_hfs_apple.so is garbled -
I use freshmeat.net for this.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I don't think you can count on the maintainers to be reading the package
>request tracker regularly. I personally would be happy to receive a
>report
>about a new version of a package I maintain. (I might not be able to
>act on it right
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> When a new major version number of a package is released, is it appropriate
> to let the maintainer know directly, or should it be treated as a new
> package request and submitted to the package request tracker? This has come
> up on the beginners-list and I'd like t
Here's what my Trees line in /sw/etc/fink.conf says:
Trees: local/main unstable/main unstable/crypto local/bootstrap
What does yours say?
On 3/22/02 13:19, "Tobias Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
>
>
>> You should get the highest version number automatically.
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> You should get the highest version number automatically. Do a 'fink
> list'
This says, in conflict with the package db on the web,
xfree86-base4.1.0-9 XFree86 libraries, utilities and data
xfree86-rootles 4.1.99.2001 XFree86 rootless display server
xfree
When a new major version number of a package is released, is it appropriate
to let the maintainer know directly, or should it be treated as a new
package request and submitted to the package request tracker? This has come
up on the beginners-list and I'd like to have a stock answer to give people
Are you sure the build went OK? A missing file typically indicates that
something failed in the compilation process. Check further back in the
output of your build to be sure.
On 3/21/02 20:58, "Jack Herrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The build compiles properly, but the installation po
Start by rebuilding some of the libs that sawfish depends on.
On 3/22/02 9:45, "Duncan Galloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
> I finally got gnome working on my system but I hate enlightenment and
> I want to install sawfish. I try to compile using fink install sawfish
> and it does
You should get the highest version number automatically. Do a 'fink list'
and see what the version number is.
By the way, if you are using unstable, then you don't need to include stable
anymore, because all of the stable package files are duplicated in unstable.
On 3/22/02 5:30, "Tobias Weber"
Mozilla 0.9.9-1 has PSM.
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:15:55 -0500
"sarah smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know how to install the Personal Security Manager for Mozilla?
--
Masanori Sekino
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fink-users mailing lis
Hi there,
I finally got gnome working on my system but I hate enlightenment and
I want to install sawfish. I try to compile using fink install sawfish
and it does some things but then bails out as follows:
.
.
.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSAWFISH -I. -I.. -no-cpp-precomp -
Hi,
in my Trees: I have added unstable (before stable). This works for
packages you get only there, but xfree has a stable 4.1 as well. How do
I get at 4.2?
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/f
37 matches
Mail list logo
